NOVEMBER 2007

Part 2 Oath and affirmation

2.1 Oath of officer

For the purposes of section 3.3 of the Act the following oath is

prescribed—

“I, A.B., swear by almighty God that I will well and truly

serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Elizabeth the Second and

Her Heirs and Successors according to law in the office of

constable or in such other capacity as I may be hereafter

appointed, promoted, or may be reduced, without favour or

affection, malice or ill-will, from this date and until I am

legally discharged; that I will cause Her Majesty’s peace to be

kept and preserved; that I will prevent to the best of my power

all offences against the same; and that while I shall continue

to be a member of the Queensland Police Service I will to the

best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties legally

imposed upon me faithfully and according to law. So help me

God

LetterS to BARRISTER in Court during a Police CaSE - wHO DO THEY SERVE?
----- Original Message -----

Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:33 AM Subject: Re: COURT

Hi Snowey..   Pete here..   Snowey the big thing to remember is they(POLICE) are your servants, they just surround themselves with a big bluff.   They are shit scared of us saying a few things, and keeping out of their order, ie, who do you serve and trial by jury, and of course, the jurisdiction of the court, as you know that are not ''courts'' but collection offices, run by the private bankers.  

We given out the docs on Law Courts LTD,[ASIC] which shows that all our courts are privately owned by a company that is limited by guarantee.[max of 50 private shareholders, non public, chaired by Megan Greenwood]  

Also as you are on Johns mail list, you would of by now, seen the SEC doc that lists OZ, as a registered Corp, making all entities inside this ''country'' corporations.   Meaning that the 8 clauses of contract law apply..Heaps of mileage there.  Start by getting the Jurisdiction doc, and take it from there..   Just stick to the basics, then when he starts bringing up all that gov rubbish as in acts and statutes, [not laws at all but guidelines], you just say that all that is created by the people, and without people you have nothing, you are nothing because we give you life, we create your reality, therefore, you are our servants.  

And just say the one thing that they hate,who do you serve?   If they say the crown, then they are an officer of a foriegn power, and that is treason, and if they say they serve the people, then ...wheres my jury?,they are completely stumped, and of course, its treason again, because they have removed your right to trial by jury, and have been operating without consent all day, all week, for who knows how long..  

There  a heap of other things you can say..but Snowey start with the basics, just stick to the facts.   Help the people in the court comprehend what is going on.   That way you can start the ball rolling even more.   And the facts are they are not courts at all, and everyone realises that, we are starting to take them back.   Have a good one, its all happening, captain, pete melov

John,
My point was that all of your so called authourities, (it's the same here in Canada or any commonwealth country) the police, the lawyers, the judges, the politicians have all sworn allegiance to a foreign ruler! Not the people! Read their oaths of office. So we have a bunch of foreign servants running our countries. They will never listen to the people that elected them. Their oaths prevent them from doing so. So next time they want you to appear in their courts you can ask them the questions on the record.
1) Why are foreign servants holding court here? Answer = Proof they lack jurisdiction.
2) What would you sir call a fellow countryman who is a sworn servant of a foreign ruler? Answer = Traitor
Do you think any judge, lawyer, politician or cop would want this on the record?
Cheers...
Camino

Here is some questions to ponder people...
What would you call a fellow countryman who is the sworn servant of a foreign ruler?
Is this not a self confessed, under oath, admission of treason?
What is the penalty for treason in Australia?

The penalty is "Imprisonment for life".
....................................................................

Challenging Jurisdiction is an item on my website of http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au YOURS SINCERELY, JOHN WILSON
----- Original Message ----- From: Graham Paterson To: John Wilson Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 1:04 PM Subject: Re: Fw: who do you ( they ) serve ?
Hi John, The truth is - the present Australian constitution is an Act of the British Parliament - it doesn't need a Jury to determine that. As long as that fact remains true, we remain a "Colony" of Britain in a 'strict' legal sense. All our wishful thinking; and all our desires; and all the 'evidence' one might produce will not alter the fact.   If you can 'prove' anything to the contrary I would certainly like to hear it - and see it.

Dear Graham,   The Privy Council admits the UK has no Jurisdiction in Australia.   The Foreign and Commonwealth Office admits HM QE2 is Head of State of the UK and has no executive power in the Commonwealth of Australia.   The UK High Court declared the UK Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 is only of "historic interest".   The Privy Council admits there have been no Orders in Council for the appointment of Australian Governors-General.   Is that enough for starters?   Yours sincerely, John Wilson.  

********************************************************

MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE IS FRAUD:

FRAUDULENT LOAN CONTRACTS:

Under COMMON LAW, there are 8 essential elements for the creation of a contract, ie: (1) offer; (2) acceptance; (3) sufficient consideration; (4) intention to enter legal relations; (5) capacity to contract; (6) legality of purpose; (7) genuine consent; and (8) certainty of terms.

VARIABLE INTEREST RATES render a contract void for uncertainty. To make out that an illegal contract is valid is fraud and obtaining money by fraud is stealing.

FRAUDULENT DEFAULT JUDGMENTS:

“No Freeman shall be dispossessed unless by the lawful judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land” (Magna Carta 1215). Magna Carta is entrenched Constitutional and COMMON LAW in Australia. The RIGHT to TRIAL BY JURY is inalienable, ie; it cannot be taken away and it cannot be given away. Unless both parties to any action in any Court sign a MEMORANDUM OF CONSENT to be without a JURY, no Court has JURISDICTION to proceed summarily, ie: without a JURY. “That the awards, doings and proceedings, to the prejudice of your people in any of the premises (ie: Magna Carta), shall not be drawn into consequence or example” (Petition of Right 1627), ie: they are illegal and void.

DEFAULT JUDGMENTS are made SUMMARILY.  Any awarded Writs of Possession are illegal and any actions taken by the Sheriffs under such Court Orders is TRESPASS.

                                                *******************************

DEMOCRACY IS THE RULE OF COMMON LAW:

“COMMON LAW doth control Acts of Parliament (ie: STATUTE LAW) and adjudges them when against common right to be void” (Lord Edward Coke).

COMMON LAW is the LAW of the PEOPLE, by the PEOPLE and for the PEOPLE. It is made by the congregations of twelve Freemen as JURORS, who ask “So help me God” for them to administer JUSTICE and JUSTICE is “the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs”, and “In a civilized society, the purpose of a court is the vindication of men’s rights and the enforcement of just causes” (Lord Denning).  However, a KANGAROO COURT is “a Court which acts unfairly, or dishonestly, or disregards legal rights or disregards legal procedures”.

- Written by John Wilson, http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au