Iraqi
Resistance Replies To Bush Speech: Sets Terms For
U.S. Surrender
Bush
..Why
the Hurry?!?!
06/29/05
Rafidan-The Political Committee
The Mujahideen Central Command (MCC)
Baghdad- The Republic of Iraq
Release No. 14
Title: Bush
..Why the Hurry?!?!
Peace to you by the Grace of God,
We solute the dear resistance factions and May god be
your protector.
The War Criminal Rumsfield has spoken of lies when he
claimed negotiations, for he today curls in Pain.
We Rafidan, represent part of the resistance factions,
confirm only to reinforce a driven nail in this war
criminal's head, that there is no such word
"negotiation" in our political agenda. We have
a phrase though, that calls to fight the invaders till
their defeat, & war criminals are to be brought to
justice, Iraq is to be compensated for the losses, &
revenge must be taken from all those who supported the
sanctions & the annihilation of the Iraqi people
& their army.
Let us all ask ourselves, why Rumsfield, Rice, &
Blair, reiterated this lie in a synchronized manner!
Before Two Years, Bush:
- Declares war on us, & the congress
rejoices, the congress rises and falls seven times to
express their support to this tyrant.
- He acquired media statistics that
declare 85% support from his people who are waiting for
Iraq to be annihilated from this planet. (Today, we know
where he got his figures!)
- This tyrant issued many laws which
reduce freedom & all were silent!
- He insults the U.N. & governments
till they recited his prayers and submitted to his will
in support of his so called war on terror.
- He cried for the innocent lives taken
on 9/11, everyone believed him, despite all the evidence
that the stunt was prepared by his CIA and the
Zionists and patsies.
Where is Bush Today?
- The congress shouts, where are the WMDs? Why did we
lose 2000 of our soldiers and 12,000 injured as admitted
by the pentagon, where were 200 billion Dollars spent,
which companies made the profits? Then the congress
demands the resignation of Rumsfield!
- His new figures claim 60% of his people
urge for a quick withdrawal from our land.
- Proceedings for a popular war tribunal
have already begun in Istanbul and in European Cities!
- His Generals need 10 to 12 years and
150 thousand soldiers on continued Duty & over one
trillion Dollars every five years & want to leave the
whole world to deal with the Iraqi Resistance!
- His alliances crumble and his partners
in crime flee gradually.
- Blair is defeated in Parliament and
will be relieved from his party within a year!
- Europe, The Russians, the Chinese are
watching the raging tired and bleeding American bull, and
are rejoicing the strikes of the resistance in heart.
Before the final blow!
- His soldiers flee the fields to live as
refugees, to form groups of influence, along with pilots
who call for the refusal of active duty in protest to the
lies told.
- Bush today begs for international
assistance and talks are held worldwide and round the
clock to find what one can, of contributors who may fund
the puppet governments of Ayad Allawi and Jafari, no one
wants to invest!
What Happened?
When Rumsfield visited Baghdad lately, quietly, like the
coward thief he is, he met with his secret army which he
quietly established in 2002 from 130 criminals and with
the cost of 140 million dollars of an annual budget.
Among them is the former American Ambassador & James
Styles, The hit squad leader from the Salvador. &
Steve Castle the head of the Sabotage and assassination
forces in Bolivia, & Colombia, he is today the
advisor of the puppet Persian interior minister they have
appointed in Baghdad.
The Summary of their meetings was, simply, that it is not
possible to bring defeat to the resistance. The best
solution is to seek a political way out, or to withdraw,
under U.S. conditions.
As for the cause of their depression, it
is due to the fact that they have tried all the tricks of
the trade in their books. Assassinations, Sabotage,
market fires, unemployment, sectarian agendas, lack of
electricity, cutting water supplies, blowing water
pipelines, poisoning water reservoirs & food
reserves, mixing wheat with heavy metal powders, but the
Iraqis were patient, and have found the remedy to this
disease!
Rumsfield was surprised, due to the resignation of Paul
Wolfowitz, his accomplice in crime after failing to find
a solution that may set aside the firepower of the
resistance. For he has not yet forgotten the night we
forced him to run for his life in his under pants from
the Rashid Hotel in the early days of the occupation. The
news broadcasters may remember his humiliation! It seems
that he convinced his master that as a Zionist that he
is, he is more capable in reducing the world population
and put those who remain alive in dept to America for as
long as they live using the world bank!
Suddenly, the American Administration, were surprised due
to their stupidity that Iran did not respect the secret
deal they agreed upon. In cooperating to bring stability
at least in the southern areas of Iraq, Iran has extended
its interests to increase their influence to other Gulf
States, like Bahrain where we see the continued sectarian
demonstrations and in Saudi Arabia, where Shiites reside
in Hasa and Dammam, also oil rich areas! These areas are
now boiling with sectarian agendas and with the direction
of Qumm in Iran and under the supervision of Persian
Sistani.
Today the Pentagon has discovered that there is a doomed
future to the oil rich area and the future explosive
environment lurking in the dark corner ahead. Especially
after the eventual discovery that they just made in
finding out that Iraq, is the true black hole that will
pull this Middle East to an anarchy which know one can
predict it's end!
Here, the European Community entered in fear and
compromised with the bush administration to accept &
recognize the puppet governments in return for political
solutions.
Rumsfield also found a solution which he thinks may save
him!
The return to the Kissinger method in Vietnam, when he
requested negotiations, he began bombardment!
He began with the destruction of Al Qaem, Karabila, in
his spear operation, and instructed his puppet Persians
in the appointed government to initiate operation
thunder, to kidnap, kill and imprison! He also used the
Dagger operation of "Rustum" ( Persian General
who lost the battle of Qadisiah against the Arabs in
history) to stab the innocent day and night in the
streets, cars, and markets. Then he requested to
negotiate; for he seeks knowledge of the secrets that
bring life to the Iraqi resistance, who are it's true
leaders? who will sell out and accept treason? Why do
they prefer Iraq as a future than the current and running
bank accounts? Why can they not be bought?
Thus, Negotiations are the new lie of the weapons of mass
treason!
We predict more air raids and destruction of our cities
and villages. More killing and kidnaps, just as they did
in Vietnam and Algeria before they fled. This in return,
gives us the right to use all the types of weapons in our
arsenal because American Fascism will not be defeated
easily and the fight will continue to be fierce for some
time and bloody too!
We also predict, that the son of all criminals Ayad
Allawi will be re-awarded control of the rudder of
treason along with Chalabi, Sistani, and Badr Militia.
Because they are all now, in one boat, on their journey
of defeat. Allawi, is now performing and visiting Arab
Governments which continue to treat him as a prime
minister still, by orders of their American Embassies.
What Does Rafidan Say?
1- We have forced the invaders now to recognize our
existence and naming clearly the Iraqi Resistance and
thus have forced the general media to follow suite.
2- We have rendered useless the enemies
high tech space weaponry and satellites and are hunting
them down on our land at the time of our choosing.
3- Because they practice crimes and kill
people indiscriminately, this gives us the right to reply
with weapons they cannot imagine we will present to all
our sons in order to bring the defeat of the American
Fascists administration starting from Sharnaka 2 and
Masamir 4 ?!?!
4- As long as the invaders destroy our
nation, then there is no reason to stop any Iraqi or Arab
abroad from striking back in their countries of residence
or at enemy bases in occupied Kuwait or Jordan!
Finally, Do you really want to Negotiate? We Accept,
But under our Conditions!
- All enemy troops are to withdraw to the occupied city
of Kuwait.
- Then we sit under the exact same tent, that Schwarzkopf
erected at Safwan, only this time it is to be erected in
Matlaa the generally known and accepted borders of Iraq,
and with the authorization of our new government, which
will be declared soon at the correct timing from our
Baghdad, we will negotiate your surrender !
We have the Oath of God!!!
Rafidan
The Political Party
The Mujahideen Central Command
Baghdad the 20th of Jamadi first 1426 H
The 27th of June 2005 M
The Iraqis did not kill our
ambassador
Friday, July 08, 2005 3:23 PM
The death of our ambassador ended an important and short
lived drama in Egypt: sending him, confusion about why he
was sent, appeals made to not send him, kidnapping him,
appeals made to release him, and finally killing him.
With the termination of this episode another more
sensational one seems to be about to be released. Like
our movies, it is not difficult to anticipate where the
scenario is taking us. The regime will try to provoke an
angry popular response to this brutal and miserable death
and to use it to its favor. It will try to capitalize on
this anger to acquire sympathy
and support for its rotten regional role, for its
bankrupt local performance, to attack and weaken popular
solidarity with the resistance in Iraq, maybe even to
launch a campaign against resistance to occupation in
general, to undermine rising anti regime groups back
home, and to dilute anti imperialism sentiments in Egypt.
And its attempt will fail because it is simply based on a
lie about who is responsible for the murder that people
see well.
What happened might end up being more than just one
tragic incident; it can recur in the future. It could be
only a beginning of a trend, and it could very well
repeat not only in Iraq but possibly also in Gaza after
the so-called withdrawal. And because it could probably
recur more than once, they must do all that they could to
somehow diffuse its potential anti regime and anti
imperialist threat and to use the anger that such an
event would most probably generate to their favor. Bush
and Blair attempt the same thing every day to counter
their people¹s angry reactions about their casualties in
Iraq. And because this event and its like expose the
realities of the alliances being made, they will surely
try to confuse us about who is to blame, hoping that if
they succeed now, it would help them in the future as it
recurs.
The game that they will play is an old one. The regime
will most certainly try to take advantage of our innate
capacity to reject the slaying of a fellow citizen and
our tendency to react chauvinistically, which never
failed to be provoked when needed. In fact, this has
already started spontaneously and several messages on
Egyptian email groups reflect it. They are also most
likely to attempt personalizing the event and remind us
day and night of what a great man the deceased was and
how he courageously served his country; a convenient and
continual reference to his family would also doubtless
make its way to the media. The media will therefore
portray the event as an honorable death; that of a hero
serving his country and performing his duty. Some of us
will also participate in this. In fact, some of us
already are. Soon after he was kidnapped some people
reacted negatively against the resistance and rapidly
began to exchange information about the honesty of the
deceased on email groups. We also began to wonder about
the agony that his family must be passing through as he
was kidnapped. Many prayed for his release and safe
return for his family. We also quickly discovered that he
was popular among everyone that knew him or worked with
him, that he was a man of exceptional conduct, that he
loved his country, and that he was highly educated. He
was in short a good diplomat, an amazing man, and a great
loss. Despite our tendency to inject our emotions in
these representations, there is no reason to believe that
this was not the case. We might have very well lost an
honest patriot who wanted to serve his country and
thought that he was doing so. Egyptians therefore have
the right to condemn those who killed him, and ask for
vengeance. I share this with them.
But who killed him? Why would anyone kill a man known for
honesty and integrity? Was it the Iraqi resistance? The
answer seems very clear to me: of course not. The
perpetrators of this crime are very obvious. We all know
them. Our ambassador was killed by the US administration
and its client regime in Cairo. They are the ones to
blame, not the resistance. And they killed him many
times, not just once as we think. They killed him once
when he, a man who wanted to serve his country, was sent
to Iraq against the wishes of the people of Egypt. They
killed him a second time when his life was physically
ended so disgracefully and when he was slaughtered as if
a filthy thing. And they killed him again when he, an
honest man as he seems to have been, died for one of the
most dishonest causes. And they are killing him right now
as they use his death to arouse popular sentiments
against resistance and in support of the regime. The
resistance did not kill him, they did.
How can anyone justify his honest trip to Iraq? The US is
destroying Iraq and our regime is clearly trying to
legitimize its presence there. It has even gone as far as
calling out loud on the American troops not to withdraw
from Iraq in the name of stability and fighting
terrorism; it must stay to prevent Iraq from falling into
chaos, we were asked to believe. Only an extremely
pathetic regime that can't come to grasp how bankrupt it
has become can make statements like this and ask us to
believe it. The US and its clients are the ones who
should be blamed for everyone killed in Iraq, anyone
killed from any side involved. They are the criminals,
not the ones who fight to liberate their country. By
sending an ambassador to Iraq, the regime was serving US
occupation and joining those who rushed to provide a
government of traitors with diplomatic legitimacy against
its people. By providing training to the Iraqi police,
the regime was taking part in equipping the criminal
government with the tools needed to massacre and torture
Iraqi people, the very tools that are ruthlessly used to
silence everyone who rejects occupation. And, by
appointing an ambassador to Iraq and calling for
prolonging the occupation, the regime is not only
providing these filthy services for the brutal colonial
rule and its corrupt cronies, and providing moral support
for war criminals of the worst grade, but it is also
acting against wide popular Egyptian consensuses. Like
everything that
they do, they did this in spite of our very clear and
unequivocal rejection. It was a completely illegitimate
act and should never be portrayed as having been taken
for some "Egypt" He did not die for us; we were
against this mission, against every bit of it.
And why did they send him? To please the US by providing
the government of traitors in Iraq with moral diplomatic
support? For sure. But this is only one of the stories
being circulated about the expected roles of the Egyptian
diplomatic mission in Iraq. The US wanted more than just
legitimization, and our regime was willing to comply as
usual. As he was sent to his new post news leaked that
³Egypt² plans to take part in attempts to integrate the
Sunna into the political process. What does that mean? If
this were true it could only mean that the regime was
trying, with others in the region, to convince the Sunna
to join the occupation government, and by extension, that
the regime was trying to make a way for some of the
resistance groups to negotiate with the Americans; that
is, to give up armed resistance. One can easily believe
these news leaks to be true. It fits well with the formal
position of all US clients in the region. They repeatedly
declare that the so-called Sunni camp must be given
proper space in the rotten political process. We also
have ample evidence that our regime does not mind at all
to broker against resistance. Our regime has already
played this role far too many times in Palestine, and it
is trying at this very moment to convince Hamas to join
the government of Abou Mazen; reads, to concede in
exchange for some peace that would be defined later, some
time in the next millennia. The job in Iraq was therefore
to be called integrating the Sunna in; ending the chaos;
regaining stability in a chattered country; but again, in
plain language, all this means simply to quit resistance.
The Americans are giving signals that they want to
negotiate, and only with some of the resistance groups.
They want to get them out of the resistance cam and
reduce the size of the overall resistance. This requires
help from client regimes in the region, supreme among
which is ours. Some resistance groups are also flirting
with this proposal. The Americans seem to think that if
they manage to get a couple of these organizations to
quit resistance, it would be easier to smash the rest. If
our regime was indeed planning to play a role in this,
then it should not surprise us that our ambassador was
snatched very quickly by the most radical organization in
the resistance. To them, such a role must appear to be
more dangerous than everyday American military
operations, and they must have been determined to stop it
at any cost.
What a shameful death for a respectable man, one who was
probably convinced that he could take part in serving his
country and helping the Iraqis out of a mess caused by
what Egyptian diplomats must believe to be a futile
resistance. I have no doubt that he believed that he was
serving Egypt and
that the Iraqis' would appreciate Egyptian support, and
that we are all not realistic in our support for
resistance as a way out. This, if anything, shows how
little they trust and respect us. They know better and we
are to be treated like children and not to be taken
seriously. They do not appreciate how we see what they
call supporting the Iraqis. They see themselves as being
above sentimental popular analysis and seem to know well
that history is shaped in the closed rooms of the elite.
They don¹t buy what we say and ridicule our beliefs. His
appointment to Iraq can not be understood as anything but
a symbol for that they strongly believe we don't matter.
That could also be the reason why he went for a stroll in
Baghdad without having protection, which shows how
completely misguided and detached from people struggle
our regime has become. The Iraq resistance, to his fatal
surprise, is not viewing acts of legitimizing the current
Iraqi regime or the attempts to help them negotiate with
the Americans, if indeed they were being undertaken, as
ways out as much as they see them as ways to force
voluntary servitude. We view it the same. Within the
current political configuration men and women of
integrity become recruited in a regime headed quest for
providing moral support for the US project in Iraq and
the massacring, torture, rape, and destruction of
livelihoods that it promotes. They become recruited in
this against overwhelming wishes of the Egyptian people
and claim to honestly represent them. They see no
contradiction between their actions and their claims.
This murder was very clearly perpetuated by the regime
and its imperialist overlord, not the Iraqis. The
resistance is not to blame. He should never have been
there to start with. We do not respect what this
respectable man went to Iraq for. Our ambassador's death
was the outcome of an American policy that was
implemented by our regime. When they proceed to kill him
for the last time; when they remind us day and night
about his family, his death in serving duty, his
patriotism, we will remember who really killed him. We
will also remember that in the current political climate
that we live in respectable Egyptian men and women can
very well end up dying many times in serving extremely
disrespectable ends.
Mohamed W.
|