Another
study on Bush's Boys: After Addington comes Albaugh and
Brown
FEMA Director Michael Brown and Bush political operative
Joe Albaugh (ex CIA man)

Joe AlbaughA native
Oklahoman, Joe Albaugh began his association with George
W. Bush in 1994, serving as campaign manager for Bush's
successful run for governor of Texas. He then became
Bush's chief of staff. His duties included overseeing all
emergency and disaster occurrences and he was dubbed
"master of disaster" when he supervised relief
for both flooding and drought.
In February 2001, after Bush was elected
president, Albaugh was appointed director of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Bush decided soon
afterwards to assign terror response to FEMA.
Congressman
Crowley meets with Joe Allbaugh, Director of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, to discuss the personal and
financial needs of civilian survivors of the 9-11 attacks
and the victims' families. Congressman Crowley is working
with "Give Your Voice," a group of families who
are working to ensure that their needs are met.
Brown had been saying for six months or more
that, if Bush was elected, he was going to have a high
position in Washington because he was very close to
someone who was very active in Bushs campaign.
While most folks who knew Brown over the years were
startled to see a person of such modest accomplishments
in a high Washington post, the IAHA brass was not. As
Hart recalls, Brown had been saying for six months
or more that, if Bush was elected, he was going to have a
high position in Washington because he was very close to
someone who was very active in Bushs campaign.
Why exactly would this apparent incompetent be tapped for
one of the most sensitive jobs in post-9/11 Washington?
The key to that mystery lies in the career of Joe
Albaugh, George W. Bushs adjutant since 1994, who
first met Brown back in the 1980s when both were young
men starting out professionally in Oklahoma...... The
first verifiable direct link between Albaugh and Michael
Brown is in an obscure company called Campground
Development Corporation, which Brown and his
brother-in-law, Bill Oxley, formed in 1985. For two
years, records show, Campground Development employed Joe
Allbaugh as a state capitol lobbyist..
Before joining the DHS/FEMA, Brown was the Judges and
Stewards Commissioner for the International
Arabian Horse Association, (IAHA), from 1989-2001.
After numerous lawsuits
were filed against the organization over disciplinary
actions Brown was forced to resign.
A March 2000 two-part report in the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch, chronicling one of the
disciplinary actions, lauded Brown for pursuing an
investigation against David Boggs, "the kingpin of
the Arabian horse world," despite internal pressure
to end the inquiry The Brown-led investigation found
Boggs performed medically unnecessary surgery on horses
to enhance their visual appeal. An ethics board suspended Boggs for five
years. Boggs protested through multiple lawsuits against
both the organization and Brown, alleging slander and defamation.
Brown and the IAHA prevailed, but the lawsuits
nonetheless took a toll on morale. Some members
interviewed felt Brown showed an imperious attitude, and
nicknamed him "The Czar."
Brown started his own legal defense fund before
resigning, a move he said was necessary to protect his
family's assets. However, some IAHA insiders claimed that
this was what really led to his ouster. He raised money
from breeders for the fund as well
as IAHA, creating a conflict of interest. Also, his contract
stipulated that IAHA was to pay all his personal legal
expenses, on top of his $100,000 annual salary. IAHA
became financially depleted, and had to be merged with
the Arabian
Horse Registry of America.
Within six months of Browns arrival as general
counsel of FEMA, Allbaugh was ready to promote him.
First, though, he had to oust his current acting deputy
director, John Magawa former director of the U.S.
Secret Service and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Firearms, whom Clinton had placed in charge of
coordinating domestic-terrorism efforts for FEMA.
Allbaughs most damaging accomplishment at FEMA was
pre-positioning Michael Brown as his successor. Allbaugh
included him in all key deliberations, even naming him
Chief Operating Officer, and Browns influence was
apparent to all.
One day, Mr. Allbaugh came in and said, I
know youve got these other things to do. Im
going to ask Mr. Brown to be deputy, recalls Magaw,
who promptly returned to the domestic-terror position
assigned him by Clinton. In reference to Hurrican Katrina
on August 29,
2005, five hours
after the hurricane hit land, Brown made his first
request for Homeland Security rescue workers, to be
deployed to the disaster area only after two days of
training.He also told fire and rescue departments outside
affected areas to refrain from providing trucks or
emergency workers without a direct appeal from state or
local governments in order to avoid coordination problems
and the accusation of overstepping federal authority.On September 1,
2005, Brown told Paula Zahn
of CNN that he was
unaware that New Orleans' officials had housed
thousands of evacuees, who quickly ran out of food and
water, in the Convention Center even though major
news outlets had been reporting on the evacuees' plight
for at least a day. He also criticized those that were
stuck in New Orleans as those "who chose not to
evacuate, who chose not to leave the city"
(disobeying a mandatory evacuation order).On September 2,
2005, Chicago Mayor Richard
M. Daley stated that he pledged firefighters, police
officers, health department workers, and other resources
on behalf of the city, but was only asked to send one
tank truck.
Controversy arose in November of 2005 as a House
committee investigating the response to Katrina released
about 1,000 e-mail messages between Brown, staff and
acquaintances. On the day Katrina struck, Brown jokingly
wrote "Can I quit now? Can I go home?"
He later quipped to a friend on September 2
that he could not meet her because he was "trapped
[as FEMA head] ... please rescue me." On August
29th (the day the hurricane hit), Brown also quipped in
e-mail to a co-worker, "I am a fashion god"
because he shopped Nordstrom's [26].
In another e-mail, Brown's press secretary, Sharon
Worthy, advised him to roll up his sleeves, "to
look more hard-working." "Even the
president rolled his sleeves to just below the
elbow."[27]
An e-mail offering critical medical equipment went
unanswered for four days.
On September
12, 2005, Brown
announced his resignation as director.After resigning
from FEMA Brown testified before Congress
On February 10, 2006, Brown again testified before
Congress and this most recent statement, this time placed
blame for errors on the Department of
Homeland Security for the poor handling of the
disaster, asserting that the anti-terrorism focus of the
Department had caused it to deny resources needed to
FEMA.(Was he trying to blame his predecessor John
Magaw?)In his February 2006 testimony, Brown also
contradicted earlier claims that the White House was
unaware of levees having breached, stating "For them
to claim that we didnt have awareness of it is just
baloney."On March 1, 2006, AP re-released a
recording of Michael Brown and the President in a video
conference in which the vulnerability of the levy system
was raised with a great deal of concern over potential
loss of life. The President has denied any awareness of
the possibility of a levy-related catastrophe.
Consider the trajectory of Shaw Group, a Baton Rouge
engineering and construction firm, and one of Allbaughs
biggest clients. On August 15, 2005, with hurricane
season getting under way, Joe and Dianes firm,
Allbaugh Co., registered as a lobbyist for Shaw, which
began advertising for workers to man its rebuilding
projects before Katrina even struck.After the levees
broke, Shaw, which had not been a FEMA contractor during
the Clinton years, received two separate $100 million
federal clean-up contracts and saw its stock price shoot
up 50 percent in a few weeks.
 
The Allbaughs and Cheneys are literally so at home with
each other that, on first arriving in Washington in 2001,
the Allbaughs bought Cheneys townhouse in McLean,
Virginia, for $690,000. During the house tour, Cheney
must have pointed out the revolving doors. One of
Allbaughs biggest clients is Cheneys former
employer, Halliburton, whose Kellogg, Brown and Root
subsidiary got at least $61 million worth of Katrina
business.
He also formed Blackwell-Fairbanks, a joint venture with
Andrew Lundquist, with whom he had served on vice
president Cheneys secretive energy task force. (The
name of the company is based on the hometowns of the two
principals.)
Court Requires Cheney to
Disclose Energy Documents
WASHINGTON, DC, November 27, 2002 (ENS)
- In a setback to the Bush administration's
efforts to avoid handing over key Energy Task
Force information, a federal judge Tuesday
rejected an attempt by Vice President Dick Cheney
to appeal a court order to release the documents.
The White House has been resisting disclosure of
the documents for months, but the court's earlier
order requiring that the documents be produced by
December 9 remains in effect.
The defendants are Vice-President Dick Cheney;
the National Energy Policy Development Group
(NEPDG); Andrew Lundquist, executive director of
the National Energy Policy Development Office;
Joshua Bolten, assistant to the President and
deputy chief of staff for policy; and Larry
Lindsay, President George W. Bush's economic
advisor.
The Sierra Club and Judicial Watch assert in
their lawsuit that by refusing to tell the public
about the influence energy industries had in
crafting the National Energy Policy, the Cheney
Energy Task Force violated the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA).
The plaintiff groups are asking the court to
require Vice President Cheney and other
defendants "to disclose to the American
people what went on behind closed doors in the
creation of the National Energy Policy," the
Sierra Club said in a statement today. The
National Energy Policy issued by the Bush
administration on May 17, 2001 relies heavily on
oil, coal and nuclear energy, and calls for
drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
and on other public lands. While renewable
sources of energy are provided for in the policy,
they are not emphasized.
"Today's decision brings the American
people one step closer to finding out just who
the Vice President's energy task force met with
in drafting its dirty, dangerous energy
plan," said David Bookbinder, senior
attorney with the Sierra Club. "The Vice
President should take this as a sign that the
game is up, and come clean."
"The energy policy that came out of the
administration has serious impacts on the health
and safety of American communities," said
Bookbinder. "The public deserves to know who
drafted that policy."
The Sierra Club and Judicial Watch are asking
for a full accounting of what happened behind the
closed doors of the Cheney Energy Task Force.
They want to know who was in the room, what
proposals did the energy industry executives and
lobbyists make, what documents the energy
industry submitted, and what Task Force documents
they reviewed.
The National Energy Policy is online at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/energy/
Copyright
Environment News Service (ENS) 2006. All Rights
Reserved.
The ENS website is maintained by
|
Clients in 2004 included the aerospace giant Lockheed
Martin; on required forms, Blackwell-Fairbanks would
later report that it had lobbied both the offices of the
president and of the vice president. Filings for Joe and
Diane Allbaughs The Allbaugh Company show among its
clients Oshkosh Truck, the leading supplier of vehicles
to the Pentagon. http://realnews.org/realnews.org/photos/ab.jpg

Where war was once the domain of
soldiers, it is more and more aimed at civilians.
We see this today with Israeli attacks on the civilian
population of Lebanon, their attacks on the civilian
population of Gaza and the West Bank. We see it, too, in
the war in Iraq waged by the United States of America
against a people who were no threat to anyone.
There are also the manmade viri that spread from the
laboratory into the population, causing diseases that can
potentially kill millions more.
All the evidence points to the fact that war, violence,
and the killing of innocents is part of who we are as a
species.
But what if the initial assumptions are wrong?
How many of you reading these words would be able to do
such a thing as kill a baby or small child? How many of
you could put a bullet, or several, into the head of a
ten-year-old on her way to school, or empty your pistol's
clip into the body of a child wounded at your feet? How
many of you could order the bombing of an appartment
block knowing that the dead will be civilians, families,
people who have never raised a gun against an enemy in
their lives?
We ask again. What if our initial assumptions are wrong?
What if this violence we see all around us does not come
from within us, from within people of conscience, but
comes from another source?
What if the evil we see around us in the world is not
born from human nature?
Our studies on psychopathy, and the work of Polish
psychologist Andrew Lobaczewski on the dynamics of
psychopathic political systems, suggests very strongly
that everything we "know" about the dark side
of human nature is wrong, that the primary source of the
violence and active harming of other beings on our planet
comes not from mankind, but from an almost human species
in our midst, a species that looks human, but that is
missing that which we would say is the defining
characteristic of humanity: conscience.
Could it really be that these horrors that we live with
on the nightly news, that we read about in history books,
that have always been with us and which seem such an
integral part of human life, are not a necessary
component of life? That they are injected into our lives
through a parasite/predator in our midst? One that moves
invisibly within society?
If you have done no research into psychopthy, such a
hypothesis may well seem far-fetched, an idealist
fantasy. It seems outrageous. It goes against everything
you have been taught. It goes against everything you
think you "know". However, once you have
studied the issue, have read the research into
psychopathic behaviour, have studied a psychopath's
methods and means of manipulation, once you have
understood the individual psychopath and have traced its
predation as the most successful ones move into positions
of power in the law, politics, business, the police and
the military, and as these individuals join together with
others of their ilk to form cohesive structures that can
take over social movements and political parties, once
all of this is understood, and the horror of what we are
facing hits home, then, in the face of this horror, a
small spark of hope is lit.
An in-depth understanding of psychopathy and ponerology
brings the realization that the violence around us is not
an instrinic part of who we are. It is an intrinsic part
of who they are.
Having potentially identified the true source of evil
doesn't mean that it can be easily eradicated. Obviously,
there are no easy solutions. It is way too late for easy
solutions.
However, instead of constantly fighting against the
branches, we can begin to strike at the root.
The first thing people need is knowledge of the true
problem. Just that, just identifying the real cause, is a
large step. It makes the world understandable. You can
understand why there is such relentless bombing of
Lebanon, of the Gaza. You understand why Bush, Cheney,
Rumsfeld, and the rest of their gang can lie about
Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, in spite of it
costing the lives of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis. You
stop wondering how people can do such horrors because you
see them for who they are. You understand that they act
this way because that is who they are.
So the first thing this knowledge brings is clarity. I
think that this understanding alone may well make a big
difference in how we approach the problems facing us.
With a clear mind, solutions will appear that have eluded
us while we suffered under the delusion that the problem
came from within us.
If the origin of evil is genetic, that is, it arises from
those psychopaths with this genetic difference who have a
predisposition to committing acts that the rest of us
judge as evil while we, the people of conscience, do not,
we need to become aware of this difference and the way it
is being used against us.
And here is where such understanding brings hope. Such
violence is not part of what makes us human. This
understanding will give to people a hope that the
senseless slaughters of history, that have been put down
to "human nature", and therefore to a certain
inevitability, can be ended once and for all. If the
psychopaths who rule our societies and who deform our
understanding of ourselves can eventually be isolated,
human history might well embark on a completely different
path..........................
Henry See of Sign of the Times
|