REPORT FROM The National
Platform EU Research and Information Centre
Wednesday 16 August 2006

EU Commission encourages
Irish broadcasters to break the law on political
advertising
-
Media statement by Anthony Coughlan on behalf of the
National Platform EU Research and Information
Centre
* * *
Political and religious advertising is illegal on Irish
radio and television. It is the responsibility of
broadcasters themselves not to carry such advertisements,
and if they have doubts about them to seek legal advice.
The EU Commission office in Dublin had been funding a
series of political advertisements on Newstalk 106
and community radio stations throughout Ireland in recent
months. Ostensibly their purpose is to tell people
of the existence of a "Europe Direct"
information service which the Commission maintains. In
reality they broadcast exclusively positive messages
about the EU which are politically
propagandist.
It is probable that the EU Commission Representation in
Ireland, which funds these advertisements, did not seek
the approval of its superiors in the Commission in
Brussels before launching them here.
The case-law on the matter indicates that the test of the
political character of broadcast advertising in Ireland
is whether it is capable of affecting voting behaviour in
elections or referendums - not the substantive
character or accuracy of the advertisements themselves.
By that criterion NewsTalk 106 and local community radio
stations have been breaking the law by carrying the
Commission-funded adverts, although doubtless they have
been assured by the advertising agency placing them
that they are legally OK.
Former Green Party MEP Patricia McKenna has sent a
solicitor's letter to the Commission in Brussels,
apprising it of the fact that its Dublin office has been
encouraging Irish broadcasters to break the law in this
matter.
In 1995 Patricia McKenna took the well-known law case
which led the Supreme Court to lay down that it was
illegal of Irish Govermments to spend public money in a
one-sided fashion in referendums here. She did this
at great personal risk to herself, to defend Irish
democracy and advance the public good, for if she had
lost and had legal costs awarded against her, it would
have imperilled her house and other personal
assets.
Ms McKenna is equally concerned about these
Commission-funded adverts, for the Commission has
virtually limitless funds at its disposal to finance
these. The advertisements for "Europe
Direct" are a form of testing the Irish waters, as
it were. If the Commission can get away with these, such
advertising will undoubtedly in time be stepped up
massively.
Below for your information are copies of three letters in
Village Magazine drawing attention to these
Commission-funded adverts, including one from Mr Martin
Territt, Director of the Commission Office in Ireland,
seeking to defend them, and a reply by the undersigned.
People can judge for themselves whether the excerpts from
the broadcast advertisements quoted in this reply are
capable of influencing people's votes in elections or
referendums, in so far as voting may be affected by the
policy or attitude of candidates or parties on EU
matters. All reasonable people will surely agree
that they show that Mr Martin Territt's contention that
the advertisements are entirely neutral and
non-propagandist in character is quite
unsustainable.
(Signed) Anthony Coughlan
Secretary
LETTER 1:
Newstalk's EU ads are in breach of law,
Village, 13-19 July
A series of political advertisements publicizing the
"Europe Direct" information service which
NewsTalk 106 and some other local radio stations carried
on a daily basis during March and April were
ultimately paid for by the EU Commission.
They conveyed messages that were in effect propaganda for
the EU, some of it extremely unbalanced and tendentious,
calculated to influence the voting behaviour of citizens,
and were therefore in violation of the provisions of the
Irish Broadcasting Acts, which forbid broadcast political
advertising in this country.
Last week NewsTalk 106 carried two further advertisements
on behalf of "Europe Direct" relating to
people's right to healthcare treatment in other EU
countries and the rights of passengers under EU law if
they travelled abroad by air.
Perhaps the station was assured by the advertising firm
placing the ads that they were conveying factual,
truthful and objective information and that
therefore NewsTalk was not in breach of the law in
carrying them. If that is the case the station is being
misinformed
The political nature and character of broadcast
advertising does not depend on the truthfulness,
objectivity or factual accuracy of the statements made in
the adverts, but on whether they are capable of
influencing the voting behaviour of citizens in general
elections and referendums.
These EU-related ads are undoubtedly so capable,
which is why my organization is concerned about the
matter. NewsTalk 106 should not allow itself be
used by the Brussels Commission or its Irish
representation in this fashion - however tempting the
financial awards may be.
Anthony Coughlan The
National Platform EU Research and Information
Centre
LETTER 2: No influence intended by EU radio ads,
Village, 20--26 July
Anthony Coughlan's arguments concerning radio
advertisements on behalf of the European Commission seem
a little askew.
The facts are that these radio spots, funded by the
European Commission and managed by its
representation in Ireland, have been running on local
radio stations. There is no mystique about the
advertisements and an article concerning them appeared in
a previous issue of Village(4 May 2006).
Furthermore, there is no question of their breaching
Irish broadcasting legislation on political advertising.
The advertisements in question are designed to inform
citizens of the existence of a number of Information
centres(Europe Direct centres), the website of the
representation of the Commission in Ireland
(www.euireland.ie) and the freephone number (00 800
67891011) which can be used to ask for details on any
aspect of the European Union. The advertisements,
therefore, inform citizens of the existence of different
information sources.
The messages of introduction such as the existence of
air-passengers rights, the Erasmus student-exchange
programme or the existence of legislation on clean water
are merely statements of fact that inform citizens of
rights they have acquired by virtue of established
European legislation. To describe the messages as
propaganda is therefore incorrect and, I might say,
disingenuous.
It has been the long-standing policy of the European
Commission not to interfere in any way in internal
elections or referenda in member states. The
Commission, through the representations it maintains in
each member state, provides information on decisions,
policies and laws to the media, experts and general
public. The provision of such information is never
intended to influence political decisions, electoral
contests or referenda.
Martin Territt, European
Commission Representation in Ireland,
LETTER 3: EU ads
abuse our democracy, Village, 10-16 August
Martin Territt of the
European Commission Representation in Ireland seeks to
defend the advertisements which the Commission has been
funding on Irish local radio in recent months by
saying that that are merely informing people of the
existence of some EU Information Centres, with
accompanying statements of fact regarding citizens'
rights under EU law, and are in no sense political or
propagandist in character.
Village readers can judge for themselves whether
the following excerpts from these EU advertisements
broadcast throughout the country this April are
politically propagandist or not:
"Do you know that since 1973 Ireland received over
5.5 billion euros from the European Community?"
;
"Do you know that telephone calls cost less because
of the EU?" ;
"Do you know that the EU is the largest contributor
of development aid to poorer countries?" ;
"Do you know that as a citizen of the EU you are
guaranteed the right to buy goods in any of the EU Member
States? What's more, the introduction of the euro enables
you to compare prices and get the best value for your
money in the EU" ;
"Do you know that the EU is helping developing
nations to combat poverty?";
"Do you know that there is EU legislation to ensure
the food you eat is safe?".
Political advertising on Irish radio and television
is illegal in Ireland. The jurisprudence on the matter
indicates that the political character of broadcast
advertising does not depend on its factual content or
accuracy, but on whether it can influence people's votes.
Radio advertising to tell people of their rights and
benefits from the EU, while simultaneously stating that
they can learn more from various EU Information Centres,
is surely capable of influencing voting behaviour in so
far as that may be affected by the policy and attitudes
of political parties and candidates on EU matters.
In the past year, since
French and Dutch voters rejected the proposed EU
Constitution, the Brussels Commission has been given a
hugely expanded communications budget to seek to
encourage more positive attitudes to the EU among
Europe's citizens. Territt's office is the conduit
for this money in Ireland.
The power of the EU Commission, a non-elected body,
increases with every EU Treaty. It would be
increased further if the proposed EU Constitution, or
some future Treaty based upon that, were to be ratified.
If the Commission can get away with funding political
advertising on Irish radio under the guise of providing
information on their rights for citizens, it is wide open
to abuse, and indeed can endanger our democracy. There
can be little doubt that this is the real reason for the
Commission's zeal in pushing out positive information
about the EU and its own activities in this manner.
Anthony Coughlan
The National Platform EU
Research and Information Centre

European Union Headquarters in
Strasbourg
|