The Policy
Brief entitled "Legal Aspects of Israel's
Disengagement Plan under International
Humanitarian Law (IHL)" by the International
Humanitarian Law Research Initiative states: "Despite
the military significance of the Israeli
withdrawal from the Gaza Strip, the limited
control of the Palestinian Authority over key
functions of government, its lack of control over
international borders, sea and airspace, as well
as the continued Israeli control of key security
and welfare aspects of life in the Gaza Strip are
likely to be major obstacles for recognition by
the Security Council of an eventual end of
occupation that would relieve Israel of its
obligations toward the Palestinian population of
the Gaza Strip.
To successfully bring the occupation of the Gaza
Strip to an end, one may argue that Israel will
need at a minimum to withdraw the entirety
of its troops and installations from the Gaza
Strip, in particular from the 'Philadelphi Road',
transferring full and sovereign control of the
border of the Gaza Strip with Egypt to the
Palestinian Authority. Every arrangement short of
that withdrawal and transfer of sovereignty is
likely to fail to bring an end to the occupation
of the Gaza Strip."from xymphora.com
|
THE KAPOS OF NAZI ISRAEL
by Barry
Chamish
The new nazis of Israel ran the kapos
of the Yesha Council...............................
www.barrychamish.com
(A Settler from Gaza)
It won't be
It won't happen
- deluded Gush Katif theme song
It was
It happened
- Song Of The Gush
The Nazis knew how to keep
the Jews deluded until the end. They hired kapos to run
local Jewish councils. The kapos fed the Jews false hope
until they were gathered and shipped away. Of course,
that could never happen in Israel? But it did. The new
nazis of Israel ran the kapos of the Yesha Council, and
the Jews followed them into the ghettos of Kfar Maimon
and Ofakim where they were safely trapped behind enemy
lines.
The new kapos with names like
Wallerstein and Aviner pretended to be leading a
rebellion, but they were really collaborating with the
authorities. They pretended to back civil disobedience so
long as no one was hurt or any damage caused. And that's
just what the authorities asked them to do.
However, the task was made so
much easier by the religious leaders who instilled a
sense of fatalism, laziness and superstition among their
congregants. Well over 200,000 prayed at the Western Wall
five days before the rape of Gush Katif. Almost a quarter
of a million God-fearing Jews prayed for the salvation of
Gush Katif at the site of Judaism's holiest site.
They all wasted their breath.
Their prayer's weren't answered. G-d was not interested
in Gush Katif.
And why should He be? Why should
He have anything to do with a people who won't fight for
His land and their homes? Why should He have anything to
do with a people who forego responsibility because they
believe, actually believe, that a miracle is going to
bail them out? Or that the moshiach will come and sort
things out for them?
Well, no miracle saved Gush
Katif, and still no signs of the moshiach.
If I was the moshiach I sure
wouldn't want anything to do with this sorry lot. The
depths of their delusion is beyond easy comprehension but
let us look at one example.
TWO days after the enemy
felled Gush Katif, I saw a group of young men handing out
pamphlets to save the place, in a Modiin shopping center.
I asked them, "What are you doing? It's over."
One replied, "It is not over. We can still sway
public opinion."
Briefly stunned, I retorted,
"This crappy public abandoned you. You are
finished."
Reality returned and the young
man asked, "So what can we do?"
There is only one out.
"Find a sympathetic army officer or two and take
over the Knesset."
I wasn't kidding. But they
laughed. And they will laugh and laugh until they have
nothing left to find funny anymore.
And that's what the protesters
were up to for the past year. They were gathering by the
tens of thousands outside the Knesset laughing and
dancing to tuneless Arieh Zilber songs. They danced their
homes away. No one actually thought to pass out a
thousand wirecutters, an equal number of Mace cans, and
stage a sit-in inside the Knesset. Nah, they were too
busy being Sioux Ghost Dancers to actually take action.
Why bother with action anyway when a last second miracle
is on the way?
Two days before the fascist
troops moved into Gush Katif, there was a rally where
more than
200,000 people showed up. Where was it? In Tel Aviv. Not
near the Gush Katif prisoners? Of course not. 200,000
could have actually overwhelmed the forces and made
withdrawal unfeasible. And that was not what the kapos of
the Yesha Council wanted.
And guess what question I heard
a hundred times from a hundred people that night?
"Do you think the withdrawal will go through?"
They still hadn't caught
on. .........................................
The fathers of Gush Katif
weren't prepared to defend their homes. No sir. They sent
their teenage children to the battle front. And from now
on those brave wonderful kids will lose all respect for
their cowardly fathers. Not a life was lost for the Gush,
not a soul injured. The Jews walked into the cattle cars
with their hands up.
Because of the Gush Katif
cakewalk, Adolph Sharon will send his shock troops of the
New World Order through all of Yesha, and that means
Jerusalem too, at a blitzkrieg pace. Shame on Gush Katif.
Shame on Gush Katif.
And shame on the leaders
of the protests, the Feiglins, the Matars et al for being
too dumb to know who they were fighting. For playing the
'government's' game by the 'government's' rules. Shame on
them all for leading their followers straight into the
authorities' traps. Shame on them for organizing futile
seminars, hopeless rallies and political dreams instead
of studying and understanding the enemy, then confronting
him on even terms. And that goes double for the writers
and "intellectuals" who reacted to the
onslaught with bad information and worse
advice............................
Meanwhile, I received a lot more
letters telling me not to blame the soldiers. They were
only following orders.
Remember the good old days
when Jews scoffed at Germans who claimed they were only
following orders? This army could have stood down, but it
behaved as good nazis do and obeyed immoral orders.
Things were so absurd that soldiers living in Gush Katif
voluntarily turned over their weapons to the army. Worse
yet, soldiers whose families live in Yesha helped clear
out Gush Katif. At least the nazis didn't
"disengage" whole German towns.
The Jews of Yesha
let the 'government' shut down its radio station,
Arutz Sheva, without a whimper. What remains is a weekly
newsmagazine called B'Sheva. It has been pushing the
Yesha Council/miracle line for a year. After the demise
of their beloved Gush Katif, what was their analysis?
The headline read, "The Rip in Israeli Society
Begins."
The delusions just
won't stop. There is no rip. You guys lost. Your
community will be rendered tiny and harmless, your
children will mostly join in Sabbatean Israeli society,
while some will seek refuge among the haredim. But you
are through. You are about to fall like dominoes because
you let yourselves lose.
And it's way
too late for you to figure out how.
Being the eternal
optimist, I am backing a strong idea for salvaging what's
left of the country. This is the tenth anniversary of the
Rabin assassination and Sharon is planning to make a huge
deal of it.
Show up in force at Rabin's Memorial Service this year.
Drive the truth to the surface!
..........................................................................................................................................
If you want to know
the atrocities committed by the current Israeli
government, please purchase my new book Shabtai Tzvi,
Labor Zionism And The Holocaust in English or Hebrew or
my 2 set DVD, The Deadly War Against The Settlers.
available at chamish@netvision.net.il
So are my English books; Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism
And The Holocaust; Save Israel!; Who Murdered Yitzhak
Rabin; Israel Betrayed; The Last Days of Israel;
Stop Your Sobbing
By Ran HaCohen
Antiwar.com
19 August 2005
http://antiwar.com/hacohen/?articleid=7007
Personal Thanks
Friday night I had a visit. I came home and saw a man
running to the back door. With, as I later realized, my
laptop, my watch, and some cash. I called a friend, but
she had little time for me: her sister in Ramat Gan had
just enjoyed a similar visit; they even took her car.
Another friend took my case as an alarm, in vain: a week
later their house in Hod HaSharon was broken into while
they were sleeping. My blacksmith in Netanya wasn't
surprised: "I've been in this business for 30 years,
and never seen a flood like this week. I now take orders
exclusively from clients who had a burglary."
The entire Israeli police force is in and around Gaza.
Except for a few units left over to break the bones of
the peaceful anti-wall demonstrators in Bil'in, the
Israeli forces are all in the South. The Masters of the
State are struggling with the Masters of the Land, and
we, common Israelis, have to live with rising
criminality. Thank you, dear settlers.
Our Poor Settlers
You won't find a word about the wave of crime in the
Israeli media. The media is now in "empathy
mode": we are celebrating the terrible suffering of
our brothers the settlers.
Oh, how they suffer. It breaks one's heart. "People
are thrown to the street," said Rabbi Shlomo Aviner
from Bet-El, who infiltrated Gaza to incite his
disciples. "Our life was stopped, and it will never
resume," mourns one settler. "My mother was
taken out of her home and put on a bus in Poland,"
cries another victim, "and now they're going to do
the same to me." The same, sure thing. "They're
going to destroy 20 synagogues, almost like in
Kristallnacht," complains a third idiot. Some of
them say it out loud: "it's a Holocaust."
Perhaps even worse? "If Gentiles had done this to
me, it would have been better; but Jews..." one
settler said on television. Ha'aretz journalist Ari
Shavit - once the hope of Israel's peace camp, now a
sickening right-winger - draws an analogy between a
bereaved settler's lost son and her house: "Just as
her son is no longer with her, so her home will not be
hers." Losing a son, leaving a house - it's all the
same. It seems that the more the settlers defy and
despise democracy, morality, rationality, history, even
the Holocaust, the stronger the media embraces them. Not
to portray them as lunatics, but as traumatized victims
whose deranged behavior is the ultimate evidence for
their suffering.
The "poor settlers" image dominates the Israeli
media not because it is in love with the settlers, but
because it is obedient. Prime Minister Sharon wants the
eviction to be portrayed as a huge national trauma - as a
means against any future withdrawals - so that's what the
media is doing. The narrative adopted is the settlers'
narrative. The tears dripping from my television set day
and night are shed by both the settlers and the evicting
forces, and it's the same tears: both sides share a
narrative that portrays the removal of the illegal
settlements, or the decolonization of occupied
Palestinian land, as an historic tragedy,
"uprooting," "deportation." Neither
the government nor the media offers an alternative -
neither a narrative of decolonization as a step toward
peace (the very last narrative Sharon would ever adopt)
nor any other. All that the soldiers and policemen cling
to is the formal argumentation of obeying legitimate
orders following a democratically taken decision. And at
any rate, they have been ordered not to argue with the
settlers, so that the latter's narrative dominates the
entire stage. The settlers, observes Ehud Asheri, are
"Losing on the ground, winning on TV."
Our Spoiled Settlers
This representation may seem inevitable to Israeli media
consumers, but it's definitely not the only possible one.
There is a lot of antagonism toward the settlers; none of
it reaches the media, except
for rare scoops like the police officer unknowingly
recorded telling his men to "f*ck these damned
settlers" (he was dismissed immediately, of course).
Why hate the settlers? Look: last week the worst-ever
Poverty Report was published, giving Israel a
Western-world-record in child poverty: 33 percent of
Israeli children now live in poverty, compared to 22
percent in the United States, 15 percent in Canada, 10
percent in Germany, and 4 percent in Sweden. On this
background, take a close look at the pictures from the
settlements: a great villa for every family, beautiful
gardens, well-paved streets, luxurious community
facilities. Nothing to compare with the slums of nearby
Sderot, the poor, unemployment-struck town inside Israel,
not even with the common apartment blocks of the Israeli
middle class within the Green Line. In a rare interview,
an elderly man from Sderot told Israeli television that
if all the money hadn't gone to the settlements, it could
have made his home town prosperous. Meanwhile, rows of
slums in Sderot, often bombed by Palestinian homemade
missiles, are offered for sale. Unlike the settlements,
here there are no generous public facilities, no
bulletproof windows, and definitely no compensation for
those wishing to leave.
The settlers have been spoiled by the state to such an
extent that the real question is not why they are
resented, but how come they are not resented even more.
The answer lies in the openness of the
settlements' project: Israeli lower-middle-class families
have the option to pack their belongings, leave their
slums behind, and "uproot" themselves the other
way around, to high-quality, highly subsidized housing
within a generously supportive community in the Occupied
Territories. In fact, many of them did so, especially to
the bigger settlements next to the Green Line, like Maale
Adumim. That's the power of Israel's colonization policy,
but that's its Achilles heel as well: it's these
settlers, motivated by economic benefits rather than by
ultra-nationalist fanaticism, who now "betray"
and readily return to Israel for very generous
compensations. In fact, the real pain in the neck facing
the evicting forces is not the Gaza settlers, most of
whom have left, but thousands of young rabble from the
West Bank who infiltrated Gaza, practically occupying the
emptying settlements to resist the "uprooting"
of the homes of others.
Alternatives
There are other stories, other perspectives the media
could choose. Take the story of Dugit. The small
settlement on the northern coast of Gaza is represented
just as any other: "uprooting," tears and all.
Nobody seems to remember that 10 years ago the settlers
of Dugit went to demonstrate in front of PM Rabin's
office in Jerusalem, demanding to get a piece of coast
inside Israel and get out of Gaza. It's time for peace
now, they said, let us out. The government refused. I'd
love to hear their perspective: how many of them were
killed or injured in Palestinian terror attacks since?
What do they think of the dirty game played with them?
Not a word of it in the media.
Extremely rare are also settlers' perspectives like the
one brought by Akiva Eldar: "From the age of three
to the age of 30 we licked honey," says a Gaza
settler.
"We lived in a rented house with a view of the sea,
and we paid maybe one-tenth of the rent and property tax
for a similar house in Herzliya. There are those who
didn't even pay that pittance and also got electricity
and water for free. We made a decision not to accept
compensation."
The media could have concentrated on such voices too:
much more honest, much more authentic than the fanatics'
endlessly recycled propaganda. "What broke me,"
says the same conscientious settler, "was the theft
of land between Neveh Dekalim and Shirat Hayam. I saw a
fellow, someone who looked like a perfectly normal
citizen to me expelling a group of Arabs from the Muasi
from their vegetable patch. ... I was in shock. I
realized that these people were enlisting the ideology in
order to get control of lands."
Yes - the media could wonder on whose lands the Gaza
settlements were located, from whom and how these lands
were seized. Instead, the only context in which
Palestinians are mentioned is in their
fixed role: namely, "will there be more terrorism
after the withdrawal?" A single different voice is
that of Danny Rubinstein, who, while the entire media
recycles the hypocritical clamors about the
"uprooting" of 8,000 settlers, reminds us that
"During the course of the bloody conflicts of recent
years, approximately 30,000 inhabitants of the Gaza Strip
have been uprooted from their homes. Entire Palestinian
neighborhoods along the Philadelphi route in Rafah, at
the edges of the Khan Yunis refugee camp, along the route
to Netzarim and in the north on the edges of Beit Hanun
have been turned into heaps of ruins by the Israel
Defense Forces."
*
The Israeli media could take such perspectives - points
of view of the many victims of Israel's colonization,
inside and outside, in past and present. It could remind
the viewers that in this case, the
end is also a new beginning, and that with an average
$250,000 per family the settlers are welcome to start a
new life in a more friendly place. Then, there could be
some hope that the pullout is a first step toward true
decolonization. However, the way it is represented right
now seems to confirm that basically, nothing in Israel's
colonialist ideology has changed.
R.F.
Xymphora.com comments: Despite all the
hoopla, there was never any doubt that the
withdrawal was going to be peaceful, and Sharon
must have had the secret agreement of settler
leaders in his pocket to ensure that there would
be only token violence (besides killing a few
innocent Palestinians, which of course doesn't
count). The first reason for the threats by the
settlers was to increase the amount of
'compensation' they will get from American
taxpayers for moving from one free and illegal
house to another. For some of them, this is an
ongoing racket, having moved to Gaza from illegal
houses in the Sinai with lots of compensation,
now moving to the West Bank and looking forward
to more moves and more compensation in the future
(it reminds me of the punchline to the joke
attributed to Oscar Wilde: 'We already know what
you are my dear. I'm only trying to establish the
price.'). There was even the hint of a slight
'legitimacy crisis' in Israel, where the
settlers, long revered as representing the
historic roots of Israel (I guess because they
carry on the tradition of living on stolen
land!), were beginning to be seen as threatening
the security of the whole state for their own
selfish purposes.
The second reason for the threats of violence
was to make it appear to be politically
impossible for Israel to withdraw from any more
of the West Bank, other than the few settlements
the Israelis intend to turn into police stations.
After all, if it took that much trouble to move a
few thousand settlers, how can Israel ever hope
to move hundreds of thousands? Needless to say,
with enough compensation, the withdrawal is
completely 'scalable', and could cover as many
settlers as would take free homes and hundreds of
thousands of dollars of blackmail money to move
to Israel. Israel has proved that a complete
withdrawal is possible, and it is up to the rest
of the world to insist on it.
|
|