THE ARTIST MIKHAIL
CHEMIAKIN
www.stria.ca

       
Deprived
voluntarily of his colours, the painter limits himself to
the drawing and this drawing is never a study for future
works.
What are
these drawings? One ought to say that we are dealing with
the diary of a hand. This hand takes no orders from
anyone, and probably it does not even obey in a precise
way the brain that guides it, for it, too, can even
venture to guide the brain.

    The brain
encouraged by the hand to wake up, as soon as it is
effectively awakes, it prevents the hand from behaving
rakishly. It takes charge of what the hand offers it in
semi-blindness. Where does irresponsibility end and where
does full responsibility start? To this possible
question, I would like to answer: Chemiakin never
improvises but in the fullest intellectual
responsibility, which by no means signifies that he
refuses improvisation.
When the
orders come from the motion rather than from the concept,
an itinerary must be given to it and the drawing might
look like the tracings of a seismograph or like a
cardiogram. All of a sudden, the nature pf the drawing
changes and from the abstract and it becomes concrete. A
kind of wandering of the hand - one might think -
enamored of its curves and dawdlings? But it takes hold
of itself: the drawing ends up as a walrus, or a seal or
a dog stranded on a beach: the formless becomes embodied.

The drawing can be a signature:
ceasing to be a go-between, the hand states its identity.
Let it be free to present nothing but its own existence,
its inalienable rhythm, its physical attributes through
which it is unlike any other hand in the world. It
proclaims for itself the right to become - for once - an
end and a limit. The hand does not represent and presents
nothing. It signs.
Where the
cosmos meets psychology and psychoanalysis, improvisation
rekindles the most audacious thought. Mood after mood
wrestles with the universe, the culture, the capture of
invention. Chemiakin does not have one single way to
apprehend the real or the imaginary, the human or the
divine, but all the ways simultaineously to make us aware
- fabulous, analytical, happy, tormented Chemiakin.
Memories of Childhood by Chemiakin

Rebekka with Mask by Chemiakin

I like
Mihail Chemiakin's art. I saw his pictures for the first
time in 1967 at an exhibition in the hall of the
Leningrad conservatoire. They were bright, richly
coloured canvases, mainly oil-paintings. I saw with what
interest and greediness the students of the conservatoire
were "eating up" Chemiakin's pictures. I took
with me to Moscow photographs of Chemiakin's
illustrations of Dostoievsky. They were pencil drawings
At a later
stage in Moscow, I can't say how often I looked at these
drawings, time and again, in order to revive them in my
memory to the minutest detail. Already then I had
understood the "musicality" of the painter's
hand.
That was
the very reason which led me to ask Chemiakin to do the
cover of the records of Tchaikovsky's opera "The
Queen of Spades" which I had just finished recording
in Paris. I knew that Chemiakin was capable of
"scoring" the old Petersbourg in his drawing.
And his cover started sounding for me with the illusive
colours of Petersbourg when you can't figure out whether
it is a sunrise or a sunset in the cold and transparent
radiance of the somewhat lifeless skies. It is light
failing on objects and people which makes them silvery
and elusive.
Mstislav Rostropovitch
1978 ParisUntitled
|