- Hannah saunters out with four
Rabbis for Human Rights - rites?
April 21, 2005
Last week, I witnessed my first settler
attack. "It was nothing," my
friend Arafat told me afterwards, and I know that
he was speaking in comparison to other attacks,
when people have been injured and even
killed. Here, the Palestinian farmers were
simply forced off their land. Too
easily. But what can they do? They
don't have any weapons (unless you count their
farming tools, as one woman joked to me); only
the Israeli settlers and soldiers have real
weapons.
We went to AsSawiya (not to be confused with
AzZawiya) because the farmers needed to plow
their land that they haven't been able to plow
and they had permission from the army to go on
Sunday. The village has been here for
centuries, and in the past couple decades they've
seen Israeli settlers move onto their land,
destroying or stealing it and preventing farmers
from continuing with their lives. When
Palestinian farmers try to go to their land that
is anywhere near any settlements or outposts,
they are attacked, beaten, and forced off their
land by settlers. No settler from this area
has been prosecuted, and the police consistently
refuse to accept statements and evidence, or to
follow up on cases.
Now the Israeli army has decided to
"protect" the Palestinian
farmers. The way they do this is to give
them permits to reach their land for a few days a
year (why do people need permits to go to their
own land, and what about the rest of the year?),
and they promise to protect the farmers while
they are plowing We (four people from Rabbis for
Human Rights and I) arrived in AsSawiya and met
my friend Arafat, his mother, and a few other
farmers. We walked up the mountain to the
land, We reached the place where people wanted to
work and could see the outpost in the
distance. The army was nowhere to be seen
(even though it was a designated army protection
day). The farmers spread out and plowed for
about 20 minutes before two armed settlers
approached and began yelling at the families to
stop working, to go down, to leave their
land. The farmers began walking down the
hill, followed (chased) by the settlers.
Finally, an army jeep pulled up. The
armed settlers approached the soldiers and began
chatting. Their arms were on each other's
shoulders as one soldier asked where another
settler was; clearly they knew each other.
Arafat tried to talk with the soldiers, to say,
"Where were you? This is our designated day
to plow, and we were on our land plowing.
Can we go back now and continue work?"
The response was truly baffling: "You have
to wait for the army to get here."
Weren't they the army ?

When "the army" and police finally
arrived, the settlers, Palestinian farmers, and
Israeli accompaniers began negotiating. I
sat with the women and talked, and time
passed. We must have sat there for an hour
before the army finally announced (or rather,
asked Arafat to announce) that they would be
allowed back to their land to plow for what was
left of the day. They could not go to the
land they wanted to plow, the land they had begun
working earlier. They had to stay in the
lower area, even further from the outpost.
All men had to have their IDs checked. One
soldier stepped forward and said he would check
IDs, but the job was immediately taken over by a
settler. That's right, an armed Israeli
settler from an illegal outpost of an illegal
settlement held a notepad in his hand and
proceeded to write down the ID numbers of every
Palestinian man who
had come to plow that day. Finally the
farmers were able to plow on some of their
land.
One army jeep drove up to the outpost, and
soldiers patrolled there for the next several
hours, making sure settlers did not come down
again. The farmers were relieved, and it
was a minor victory. But is it a
"victory" in the context of
occupation ?
Perhaps the most difficult part of the day for
me, on a personal level, was listening to
attitudes my Israeli companions and watching one
of them interact with all the parties
there. Most who come with Rabbis for Human
Rights (RHR) are fine, but not everyone has the
same political analysis or familiarity with the
land and the people as Arik, the RHR
director.
Arik,
of whom Debbie Fink wrote in October 2004 : Met
Rabbi Arik Asherman of Rabbis for Human Rights,
but he didn't have much time. Unfortunately, he
is not against the Wall or checkpoints, but he is
getting quite a bit of support from the
'mainstream' Jewish community in the US and does
wonderful work. |

At one point, after the men had all packed up
their equipment and gone to where the army told
them to go, a few women were still trying to stay
on their land and argue with settlers and
soldiers. One of the Israeli accompaniers
(RHR) said to me, "The women don't
understand the situation. The most important
thing today is to plow the land, not make a
political statement. If they don't plow for three
years, an old Ottoman law says that the land is
not theirs anymore." "I think the
women understand better that rules doesn't get
Palestinians anywhere. Just because they
work their land does not mean the settlers won't
build another outpost and steal it." I
heard the man talking with someone on the phone
later, probably a man, and speaking in a
condescending and amused tone about the women.
In a far worse example, another Israeli
accompanier was acting exactly like the army -
telling Palestinians not to go to the land where
they wanted to go because that would be
"provoking" an attack; stepping in the
middle of an attack by facing Palestinians and
yelling at them to move down the hill, rather
than asking the settlers to move up; ordering
farmers to go to certain places for their
"protection" - even pushing Arafat at
one point in the direction this man wanted him to
go. I told him I thought he was being
completely inappropriate, that Arafat knew
exactly what he was doing and had far more
experience with settler attacks than this man
did, etc. He did not change his
behavior. He came to me later and said,
"I have seen too much death and tragedy in
my own family, so I'm here to stop violent
confrontations no matter what it
takes." "That's fine," I
said, "and a completely appropriate attitude
when you're in Israel. But when you're
here, your job is to follow the lead of the
Palestinians and do what they ask you to do, not
push them around and tell them what to do.
If you don't want to listen to Palestinians, you
should continue your work at home, not
here." I don't think he had any idea
that the farmers would perceive him as more of an
oppressor
than an accompanier. And honestly, I don't
think he really cared. His work had nothing
to do with Palestinians; it was for
himself.
It's the same thing that happens in so many
situations of oppression, when a member of the
oppressor group comes in and tries to dictate to
the oppressed how they should act, to tell them
what's best for them. People can't or won't
step out of their own heads.
The Protocols of the
Elders of London
a document compiled by Gilad Atzmon
http://www.gilad.co.uk/html%20files/Londonelders.html
Introduction
In a very small segregated cyber shtetl
somewhere in the north-west side of yahoo (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/justpeaceuk/ ), a tiny cell of
so-called liberal Jews meets in the
wee small hours. Night after night they are
trying to save the Palestinian people from those
who devote their lives to the Palestinian cause.
There is one man who they really detest; his name
is Israel Shamir (http://www.israelshamir.net/ ). An ex-Jew, Shamir is a
very civil and peaceful man and probably is the
sharpest critical voice of Jewish
power and Zionist ideology.
Among Israel Shamirs many sins, he is
a member in the Board of Advisors of DYR (Deir
Yassin Remembered, an organisation founded with
the purpose of commemorating the victims of the
Deir Yassin massacre). DYR is engaged in
promoting reconciliation between Arabs and Jews.
The liberal Zionist cell, as we are going to
read, cannot really take it. They demand the
cleansing of Shamir. They insist upon ruining his
intellectual career or at the very least, his
reputation. They would use any possible
manipulative strategy to have him thrown out of
DYR, which is the first step towards sending him
beyond the pale.
The following extracts are available
on-line (for the time being) at Just
Peace UKs official cyber shtetl: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/justpeaceuk/
.
The extracts reveal a horrifying image of
modern Jewish secular intolerance. It is a
glimpse into the abusive, assertive and violent
world of Zionist lobbying. It is a glance into
the milieu of the people who try to determine the
correctness of other peoples world views.
When reading these extracts, just bear in mind
that the authors behind them regard themselves as
the forefront of Jewish moral thinking and
universal humanism.
Lets let them introduce
themselves
We shall start with what is the authentic
voice of the Marxist Tony Greenstein. Greenstein
suggests that anti-Zionist Jews, maybe
under the banner of Return or JAZ, should sign an
open letter to the PLO/PSC etc. insisting that
they categorically repudiate Shamir and all his
works and calling on Deir Yassin Remembered to
break its links. What is important is that those
Jews who sign are seen, without any qualification
or equivocation, to be opposed to Zionism root
and branch AND opposed to Shamir.
(Tony Greenstein)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/15068
Reading
those lines by Greenstein, I wonder whether I am
allowed to guess that anti-Zionist
Jews are basically a bunch of Just
Peace UK (a left Zionist group). If this is
the case we should never take JAZ seriously
again. If this is the case, Jews Against Zionism
are operating as undercover Zionist agents. If
true, and I still suspect it, it is very
disappointing but not really surprising.
Orna Neumann doesnt like Shamir
either, but unlike Greenstein who pleas for the
help of his brothers, Neumann expects the Arab
world to fight her Zionist wars. Neumann stresses
that they (the cyber shtetl Just Peace UK) should
ask the Arab Media Watch and Affif and the
PSC (Palestinian Solidarity Campaign) to denounce
him (Shamir). (Orna Neumann)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/15063
I may
get it wrong here but when she mentions
Afiff she is probably referring to
none other than Afiff Safieh, the Palestinian
Ambassador to the UK. The fact that Neumann uses
informal language calling Ambassador Safieh by
his first name is in itself slightly unusual. Is
Ambassador Safieh her close friend? Is he an
active member in this Liberal Zionist cell? I am
sure he isnt. For those who dont
know, Afiff Safieh is the supreme Palestinian
diplomatic representative to the UK. It seems as
if Elder Neumann is trying
to portray an image as if some informal trading
is possible with the ambassador. As if the
ambassador is a Zionist collaborator. Having had
the honour of watching Ambassador Safieh speak on
behalf of the Palestinian people, having seen him
and his wife sitting in front row seats at the
DYR event. I am pretty confident that Neumann was
searching for support in the very wrong place.
Roland Rance, a revolutionary socialist and
an alleged devoted peace lover isnt far
better. Like Neumann, Rance refers to the
ambassador, applying similar informal language,
but then, unlike Neumann, Rance doesnt ask
Ambassador Safieh to intervene, he gives him
orders. See for yourself:
So we should not ask people like Afif
and PSC to denounce Shamir because of his
anti-Jewish rantings; we should insist that they
join us in rejecting his whole approach as an
obstacle to any progressive political
strategy. (Roland Rance)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/15062
Sometimes
I ask myself what Rance and his elder friends
mean when they say progressive political
strategy, Surely they mean silencing the
voices of their political and ideological foes. I
find myself wondering what is so progressive
about silencing other people?
Apparently, some of the cell members are
slightly more intellectually developed than
others. For instance, Stephen Marks, is no doubt
a strategically concerned one:
I think he maintains, that
the approach should come from a broad range
of people, so Shamir cannot muddy the waters by
claiming it is 'the jews' who are after him. The
fact is that the zionists have been 'crying wolf'
over antisemitism for so long that some people
who have not read his material will be vulnerable
to the argument that attacks on him are simply a
reprise of the old Zionist chorus. (Stephen
Marks)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/15064
Marks
confesses here that Shamir is an internal Jewish
problem but he insists upon finding a way to
present Shamir as a threat to the world. But let
us confront some facts here. It is the
liberal Jews who attack Shamir.
Admittedly those left Jews are quoting two
Palestinian writers (Ali Abunimah and Hussein
Ibish) who denounced Shamir a while ago and yet I
have never come across an orchestrated
Palestinian campaign against Shamir. If anything,
it is the other way around. Shamir is repeatedly
praised by
Palestinians and many of their supporters. From
time to time you may come across an eloquent
critique of Shamirs ideas. At other times,
he is considered as an opinionist and treated as
such. If anything, it proves beyond doubt that
the Palestinian solidarity campaign expands and
becomes more and more colourful. This is probably
something that we miss in the protocols of the
Elders of London. When I was collecting these
extracts I found out that not many
Palestinians are engaged in any dialogue within
their cyber shtetl. If to be accurate, as a
matter of fact I didnt find a single Arab
that might hypothetically save their honour.
G-D Save the Queen
The Battle Hymn of Mad Mel, by Deborah
Maccoby, written for Debbie Fink, published with
permission, (in The Virtual Stoa) http://users.ox.ac.uk
You know how the tune goes; now sing along...
Mine eyes have seen the
glory of the US Neo-Con;
He is trampling on Iraqis till their homes
and lives are gone;
He is giving tanks and F-16s to Ariel Sharon
-
His truth goes marching on.
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah,
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah,
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah,
His truth goes marching on.
I have mounted a crusade against those loony
Neo-Socs;
They have burst the moral boundaries and cast
us on the rocks;
They may march against the war but they can
only save the fox -
My truth goes marching on.
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah etc.
I repudiate all doubts; they only burden and
perplex;
If we listened to their voices, we would all
be moral wrecks;
I will fight against abortion; I will stamp
out teenage sex -
My truth goes marching on.
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah etc.
All relativists, lefties and postmodernists I
hate;
I will cling to all the certainties of family
and state;
I will fend off the barbarians who clamour at
the gate;
My truth goes marching on.
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah etc.
For the sword of Islam threatens and its
might must be withstood;
We are fighting for the soul of our
Judaeo-Christianhood;
For the world is black and white and They are
Evil, We are Good -
Our truth goes marching on.
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah etc.
I will put back moral backbone in my flabby
fellow-Brits;
We will launch pre-emptive strikes on every
land where Evil sits;
While defending Western culture, we will blow
the world to bits -
Our truth will still march on!
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah,
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah,
Glory, glory, bomb Fallujah,
Our truth will still march on!
|
Ladies and gentleman, I assume that by now
you are ready to meet the Queen of theshtetl,
Lady Deborah Maccoby. As we are going to see,
Queen Maccoby is concerned not only with the
Palestinians, in fact she tries to save the
Christian world from regression. At the end of
the day, to be a Shtetl Queen is a great
responsibility.
the problem is that DYR has
now become mixed up with anti-Semitic regressive
Christian ideas and is being exploited as a means
of demonising Jews and is seen not just as a
symbol of massive injustice
acknowledgement of which can lead to
reconciliation - but of a kind of cosmic sin. I
know most of the people at the commemoration will
not have seen it as such (Deborah Maccoby)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/15099?expand=1
Being
myself an active participant at the DYR event I
cannot recall any anti Semitic regressive
Christian ideas. But if to be honest, I do
not know what Christian regressive
ideas are. Does Maccoby refer here to the
old accusation of Jews being Christs
killers? Maybe, but then, surely she should know
that it has nothing to do with regressive
Christianity; it is rather a historical
narrative. However, in the DYR event no one
blamed the Jews for killing Christ. If anything,
it was the Zionists who were blamed
for cleansing the Palestinian people as well as
killing them. But may I stress at
this point that Maccobys suggestion is in
itself an outrageous insult to Christianity and
Christian people. She really wants us to believe
that Christianity is a shaky and fragile
spiritual compound of dark beliefs; she wants us
to think that it is she and her disciples who can
save the Church from regression.
But we are not finished yet, it isnt
only Christianity that must be saved, it is the
foul Goyim who need saviours. Please show your
respect to the gentile soul expert
Brian Robinson. Following the great tradition of
Jewish analysts, Brian enlightens his fellows
with some deep insights into the gentile psyche.
If much of what Shamir writes strikes
deep chords within people, let's say people whose
primary motivation for involvement in this issue
is an unacknowledged, and denied, antisemitism,
then in attacking Shamir's writings we're
attacking that hidden - but probably deeply
cherished part of those people's
personalities. And they'll muster all the
narcissistic defences they can - denial,
projection (It's not us, it's you lot).
And maybe they've got us in a double bind -
if we win the argument we lose it, and the better
we win, the worse we lose ... (Brian
Robinson)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/15103
Funnily
enough, Robinson is right, you can never win, you
can only lose..
As one might guess, so far the battle
against Shamir is far from being a great success,
DYRs Board of directors ignored the
outrageous demand to spit Shamir out. And so did
the Palestinian Ambassador and all the other
respectable supporters of the Palestinian
struggle. The DYR event was an astonishing
spiritual gathering. Many Palestinians performed
and many others attended. Amongst the audience
and the performers you could find people from
every religious group, class and ethnic origin.
The Palestinian Ambassador honoured the event
while sitting in the first row. Everyone was
there except Deborah Maccoby and her clan of
liberal Zionists.
Facing the apocalyptic aspects of the
ensuing catastrophe, Orna Neumann is already
getting ready for the worst case scenario:
Has anyone seen his publication the
Flowers of Galilee (Shamirs book)?
she asks and then continues, Hitler also
started from words..... For Neumann, Shamir
is the new Hitler, he is no longer just an
ordinary anti Semite. He is now just about to
liquidate the entire Jewish people. Ask yourself
why? Like Hitler, Shamir wrote a book.
Undoubtedly, she puts her very strong logical
skills to the service of the cause; let me tell
you, dear Neumann, not only did he write a book
(more than one), he has a small
moustache.
London Underground
Confronting a clear defeat, Queen Maccoby
and Goyim-expert Robinson have realised that the
smear campaign was found to be counter effective;
they have decided to go under.
Just Peace UK list is at the
end Maccoby wrote with all our
messages on it (including this one!) Which means
we should continue these discussions off
line. (Deborah Maccoby)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/15080
If this
coded message isnt clear enough, Robinson
is here to help: Deborah, you have a
good point about continuing the discussion, but
how? One way is to establish a small email group
-- I suppose to join such a group needs a central
person to co-ordinate e-addresses - yourself??
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JustPeaceUK/message/15083
As we
can clearly see, the liberal Jews of North West
Yahoo are withdrawing back to the ghetto
practicing their old exclusive tactics. May I
suggest something? What about the Israeli embassy
in London, surely, they must have a secure
concealed room, they would be happy to help you
all. This is exactly what they are there for.
http://www.gilad.co.uk
A Norwegian Chatbox www.dagbladet.no communicated with
Vanunu in Israel via the Internet. Below are
answers he gave to queries - as most of the
answers fully indicate the question I only quote
Vanunu himself. The final reply he gives in this
column validates the letter from Deborah Maccoby
that follows, and also the observations above!

About US: we are
now in the new century, post Cold War and we need to have
new world order. That could be started by all Europe and
US behaving fairly with Israel to end the Middle East
conflict. That could happen if both Europe and US making
the right decision to demand from Israel to become a
secular democracy, giving equal rights to every human
being and ending the Israel colonialism of the Middle
East with Nuclear weapons. Next, we need all the world to
be free from nuclear weapons to take from every
superpower their nuclear weapons. That is the only way
for new world order, governed by the people, by the
United Nations for the people, and not for any State.
All my
activity here is open and known to everyone. Israel
government can put me back in prison if they want. I am
not allowed to leave the country for one year and not to
speak to foreigners or to speak about nuclear weapons.
I
will do it again and again without any regret. Israel is
a military dictatorship governed by security and secrecy.
This is a modern phenomena in democratic system. Israel
are destroying the democratic system from the inside and
exporting this policy to US and Europe.
vmjc email: vmjc1954@gmail.com
I think we are fighting the Israel invention in nuclear
proliferation. The system of secret nuclear weapons
production without any report to anyone. We need to end
this phenomena that Israel invented and teaching other
state to follow.
What drives you?
Something from our humanity that noone can control is
driving us to save this earth from crazy militarism,
and spy power.
Did you at any time doubt
that you were right? I have never had any problem with my
conscience. 200 atomic bombs with hydrogen bombs can
never be neglected or excused by any punishment.
I'll be happy if someone
will bring my case to International Court in the Hague or
European court.
About Palestine: I think the problem is Israel Jews who
should ask themselves what they want. Do they really want
to live in the ME with the Palestinians or to have an
aparteid state.
.....Because of my
Christianinty the Israelis trying to destroy my image and
deny me celebrating my freedom.
Art? I like Edward
Munch's The Scream.
I am not totally free but
I'm trying to enjoy freedom as I can. The Human Right
Organisation not doing enough for my freedom. After 19
years I am still being punished.
Yes, they can put me back in prison.
About prison: I was 17 and
half years in one cell alone. As the most dangerous
prisoner, it was very cruel and barbaric treatment to be
alone.
About NWs: the Israelis want to keep their nuclear
weapons monopoly in the ME, and I did the best I could to
act to end it.
There is no justice in
Israel, I know after 19 years of dealing with
Israel justice. It has become a security
dictatorsip. In the name of security and secrets the
State imposes any law they want.
I am a Christian and no
Christian hates Jews. All the world now is
respecting any human being. All Europe have all kinds of
minorities. There is no more anti-semitisim.
Your views on the
problem of Palestine? The best solution is a secular
state with equal rights for all the people. Not any
Jewish religious state or Muslim religious state, but one
secular state.
Terrorism is not a real
threat. The real danger is nuclear weapons in secret -
that is the main problem for every state, including
Norway.
I agree with what you say.
The Israel policy of the last 15 years is to blame the
Palestinians, take their land and build settlements. Yes,
Israel policy now is harming its reputation and it will
cause Israel a lot of trouble in the future. This case of
too much power Israel is building will cause
them to be corrupted and commit crimes against humanity.
Europe is still under the past history pressure. The
world didn't yet find the answer to Israel 's
aggressive policies. I believe in this new century,
Europe and all the world should leave the past behind,
and demand from Israel respect for real democracy
and act to end the Palestinian suffering in
occupation and in refugee camps.
Norway should be pioneer of this policy to demand from
Israel to respect any human being, any human race and to
govern by secular democracy. It can start by first of all
doing for the abolition of nuclear weapons in Israel.
My view: it was
decided in 1950s as an act, not to go for peace but, to
trust power and to impose on the Palestianians and
the Arab world this Israel Jewish aparteid
state. Instead of making peace and
receiving back the Palestinian refugees. Now they say
they act for defence. But defence of this racist
state.
I decided that they can
imprison my body but not my mind and spirit, so I keep
this belief all the time. I practice my freedom by
exercising the freedome to read and write what I want.
Also, to listen to classical music like opera.
Why do you think it is
so important for the Israeli government to stop you from
communicating with the world? Which country do you wish
to come to, if you could choose any country you want?
Why,good question,no sure answer,may be,trying to
frighten all the world media,politicians, to avoid
to deal with nuclear weapons in israel,also Revenge,
frighten every one that all could be
punished; may be because i succeeded to
prove, inspite of kidnapping, that i am after 18 years
free, alive,talking, and they don't want to admit
they were very wrong, and stupid fighting me. When I
can I'll go to see all this very small globe ,this
world.
Do you think that
Norway and the rest of western europe area afraid to put
pressure on Isreal because they are afraid of USA threats?
No they are afraid from their past ; every state
should be free from the past by revealing the past,
and standing firm behind human rights.
What can be
possible reactions after participating on this
net-meeting?
Vanunu:The result wiil be
another proof of stupidity of the israel spy's
mind.
Not the first time.
I am supporting the initiativeof any who
are understanding this case,and want to help to spread my
message.Vanunu 22.4.2005
Vanunu's
answer is validated below by an e-mail from Deborah
Maccoby:
Dear Brian,
Have just looked at the Just Peace UK list and have read
the interview with Vanunu that Mary has posted...this is
I think very disturbing:
"Judaism is one of the faiths which believes,
supports, and encourages racism, and is based on
supremacy, creating an apartheid regime."
Suppose he had said this about Islam, just substituting
Islam for Judaism - wouldn't we call it Islamophobic,
because it left out all the positive and tolerant and
moderate aspects of islam? So why can't we call this
anti-Semitic? Notice too in the interview how he refuses
to condemn the mad imams who launched the fatwa on
Rushdie and instead condemns Rushdie....however
appallingly Vanunu has been treated by Israel I still
think his anti-Semitism should be pointed out and
condemned.
Looking at the blog of Simon Jones, the interviewer(Simon
Jones infact only forwarded the Chatbox he picked up
from Norway, JBraddell,editor), he seems to be another
Jew who has converted to Christianity and is attacking
Judaism not just Israel...just read the article We are
All Jews Now....
On the other hand, I suppose Israel has asked for this
and I hold Sharon ultimately responsible...nonetheless I
think this revival of traditional Christian anti-Judaism
ought to be opposed; it is not just Shamir/Eisen/Atzmon
but is wider, and sadly Vanunu is involved in it too...
Deborah
--
from PAUL EISEN
|