WHO LET THE CAT OUT
OF THE BAG ?....
a
controversy from the internet .....
By Israel Shamir
THE BEGINNING OF THE END OF THE JEWISH POST-WAR
ASCENDANCY?
The people of France have sent an important message to
the world, by electing the traditionalist leader, Jean-Mari
le Pen to the second round of the French presidential
elections. It was not just a proof of general
dissatisfaction, as NY Times claimed.
 The first round occurred while
the Jewish troops besieged the Church of Nativity,
starved nuns, shot
priests, and despoiled the land of Christ. Israeli
bulldozers worked around the clock covering mass graves
of their innocent victims in the Jenin refugee camp,
Jewish soldiers destroyed churches and mosques in Nablus,
shot at the Holy Virgin in Bethlehem, while one hundred
fifty thousand Jews marched in Paris and elsewhere,
supporting the genocide in Palestine. Waving Israeli
flags and draped in the blue and white colours of their
national banner (the tricolour is dropped and forgotten),
the Jews marched from the Place de la République to the
Place de la Bastille in Paris, chanting in French and
Hebrew and carrying signs that read "Yesterday New
York, today Jerusalem, tomorrow Paris.”
Today’s Jerusalem is an unhappy city, its non-Jewish
majority dispossessed, uprooted, pushed into ghetto and
controlled by the brutal Jewish Border Police. Today’s
Jerusalem has the most advanced torture facilities, and
there, thousands of kidnapped Palestinians are subjected
to electric chocks, beating and humiliation.Today’s
Jerusalem is a place where only Jews can move freely and
enjoy the fruits of civilisation. Should it be a model
for tomorrow’s Paris? Mais non, the people of France
had experienced the German Nazi conquest in 1940s, and
they did not want to try the Judeo-Nazi occupation.
That was the main message sent by the French voter. We
should thank General Sharon’s brutality and ill-conceived
solidarity of Jews in France with the génocidaire for
this result. Until now, the Jews were divided in their
tasks and purposes. In Palestine, they created a toxic,
ferociously nationalist and religiously fanatic entity
based on Hitler’s Nuremberg Laws. Elsewhere, in
France as well as in Britain, they promoted the pseudo-liberal
paradigm of dismantling European national and cultural
content in favour of the Judeo-American spirit. In
Palestine, they shot at the church; in France, they
undermined it by subterfuge. One law for themselves:
extreme right wing nationalism of
Sharon. Another law for the goyiim: liberal New Labour of
Tony Blair.
 If the Jews would
have sense, they would keep the inner dialectical unity
of their pincer-movement attack as their best guarded
secret. But they were inebriated by their successes. The
spiritual teacher of Sephardic Jews, Rabbi Obadiah
Joseph, ruled that Jews should not show their ascendancy
in the world until they would be able to destroy the
Christian Churches in the Holy Land. Now, with the
Nativity besieged, they apparently felt the condition is
fulfilled. Jews became united to an extent unknown since
the days of Christ, and united by a common will, single
purpose and a feeling of arriving to the pinnacle of
power. Intoxication of power and unity caused the usually
cautious people to drop masks, to leave pretences. It
seems the Jews call out ‘Kill him’, as two
thousand years ago. This new openness provided us with a
previously unheard-of insight into the soul of the Jews
and their supporters.
An authentic Jewish voice, Ron Grossman of Chicago
Tribune[i] wrote, “As a self-proclaimed humanist, I
ought to recoil in horror from the thought of tanks
rumbling through a city, anybody's city. My head should
hang in sorrow at televised images of street fighting (rather,
massacres - ISH)
in Bethlehem and Ramallah. But here is a hint: Don't
lecture or preach to us. Forget about appealing to our
better selves”.
Please note this plural ‘us’ before denying the
obvious. The Jews do not hide anymore behind the useful
but dated device of “Americans, French or British
citizens of Jewish faith”. It is again The Jews, a
single body with a single mind. Forget about appealing to
their better selves, as they have not got any. ‘The
better selves’ were just a device. “No one can
express the aspirations of most Israelis like the prime
minister. This is not a war that was waged by Sharon, the
"warmonger," this is the war of all of us”,
reports Gideon Levy, a man of heart and conscience, who
was recently banned from the pages of the ‘liberal’
Haaretz. (I was banned ten years ago. Welcome to the
club, Gideon!) “It will also be very difficult to
blame Sharon for the consequences of the war, in the
light of the sweeping support he has been given by the
majority of Israelis. Nearly 30,000 men were mobilized
and they reported for duty as one man, making the refusal
movement, with 21 refuseniks currently in jail,
irrelevant”.
The Jews abroad were just as awful as those in Palestine.
Professor David D. Perlmutter wrote in LA Times, "I
daydream--if only! If in 1948, 1956, 1967 or 1973 Israel
had acted just a bit like the Third Reich, then today
Israelis would shop, eat pizza, marry and celebrate the
holy days unmolested. And of course Jews, not sheiks,
would have that Gulf oil". Witty if snobbish Taki of
the British weekly Spectator contributed the following
anecdotal evidence of the new Jewish vehemence and single-mindedness:
“On Easter Sunday, during lunch, the richest woman
in Israel, Irit Lando, suddenly burst into my house and
began to harangue my friends and family about Adam
Shapiro. Despite the fact she's one of my wife's oldest
friends and was invited to drop in after
lunch, I was extremely annoyed. I reminded Irit that my
house was not Israeli occupied territory; that it was
Easter; and knowing how I feel about the plight of the
Palestinians, she should change the subject. Which she
did, turning on the press, instead, and how they gave
publicity to that godawful traitor Adam Shapiro”.
As few mavericks of Jewish origin like Adam Shapiro or
marvellous Jennifer Loewenstein became increasingly
marginalized, the Jews en masse rally to support Sharon
and Israel. From Moscow to Brooklyn, from Marseille to
Hampstead, the Jews speak in one voice. WE ARE ONE,
proclaimed the headline of the Jewish Week. This vision
of united, ready for the kill, Jewry could not but scare
the French voter, and any thinking man. Le Pen was
probably the only French politician totally
opposed by the Jews.
The French and the West European Left should learn the
lesson before it is too late. Their liaison with the Jews
became a liability and a source of embarrassment.
Historically it was probably justified, but not any more.
Even the Jewish stranglehold on media can not deliver the
electoral goods. Instead of supporting Jewish agenda, the
Left should compete with the Right by addressing problems
of working class in the country and of the income
disparity on the global scale. There should be no more
immigration, and this task calls to stop the main creator
of immigration, the unfair Judeo-American globalisation
and Bush and Blair’ s War against Islam. In the
forthcoming May elections in the UK, the Left should give
the boot to Michael Levy’s protégé Tony Blair, and
turn to the tradition of Michael Foot.
The electoral success of Le Pen could signify the
beginning of the end of the Jewish post-war ascendancy.
Inverting the slogan of French Jews, we say, "Yesterday
Paris, Today Washington, and Tomorrow Jerusalem".
Comment by Hal Womack:
Israel Shamir's essays always deserve respectful
attention and often agreement. Sometimes, however, he
swings wild .
Let us briefly consider Shamir's following propositions:
"{A} There should be no more immigration, and {B}
this task calls to stop the main creator of immigration,
the unfair Judeo-American globalisation and {C} Bush and
Blair's War against Islam."
Immigration from the poor & often colored {Are Arabs
"white" ?} countries to the rich white [or
formerly white-dominated] ones such as the USA &
France certainly a critical issue. As an elderly poor
white normal alias "gentile" American taxi
driver, I personally have a worm's-eye view, so to
speak, of the economic crunch.
I learned from Lyndon Johnson's war against Vietnam,
however, to side with parties to a dispute on the basis
of justice rather than of their skin color or nationality.
Shamir's blanket Anti-immigration Prop A above, sides
with white supremacists against the immense majority of
humanity and also against the policies of institutions
such as the Catholic Church which have interests wider
than country clubs. In view of their blatantly subsidized
preferences in recent decades past I could immediately
agree to suspending further _Jewish_
immigration to the US. But totally to wall out all
Mexicans, Jordanians, Brazilians, Nigerians, Chinese,
etc? That seems to me rash. Besides, taking an anti-immigrant
stance foolishly tends to push the industrious colored
folk into the manipulative arms of the Jew-jingos, a
foolish strategy at best.
Rather than Shamir's Prop A, I reply that we should stop
war crimes. Furthermore, in order to be thorough-going
about it, we should arrest all of the perpetrators
thereof who are still competent to stand trial. Those who
are exempt from prosecution by reason of old age or
disability we should strip of all their assets above the
level of life-support and clearly designate as proscribed
persons, as in the jail ward of a hospital. War crimes
per se have come into existence mainly since the
Nuremburg Trials. Considering that all of the US wars
since 1945 have been cases of capital aggression
according to both world and US positive law and that the
same applies also to the tiny, obnoxious, deadly fake-state
of Israel, it manifestly follows that "we" --whoever
"we" may turn out to be, but for purposes of
analysis I am assuming the law-abiding immense majority
of the species, have a big job ahead of us. In fact even
thinking about it requires a serious stretch for most of
us.
However, to funk this task of establishing world justice
under law, and instead to slink into seemingly easier
formulas such as banning all immigration, were to debase
the high seat of judgment and make even greater problems
for ourselves right around the next bend of the road.
Once we have first, properly defeated Masters Bush,
Clinton, Sharon and their accomplices, then we can turn
our attention to global emergency relief measures. Next
we will consider what damages are to due to the victims
of imperial cruelty, such as the Vietnamese and the
Iraqis, to name only 2 of many examples. As Shamir is,
groping towards, we want to achieve, a global economic
balance. Probably we are going to decide to follow the
examples of Japan & China in taking measures to
stabilize the planetary population.
 We will constitute the democracy
of Earth so that humanity may transcend the belligerent
adolescence of "civilization" and achieve the
harmonious maturity of --what will we choose to call our
third age? "Kozmopolis" perhaps, as I have
suggested already some years ago?
Right now writers have the urgent duty of defending the
integrity of words by exposing lies & hypocrisies so
that humans can learn to speak with one another in a
trustworthy way to reach our common goals.
"Then thinking that he [the ship's captain] was
obliged to justify an inadmissible ordinance: 'We live in
an illogical world. Before the [French] Revolution a
slave-trader sailed these [Carribbean] seas, owned by a
_philosophe_ and a friend of Jean-Jacques. And do you
know what she was called?
The CONTRAT SOCIAL.'" {From EXPLOSION IN THE
CATHEDRAL by Alejo Carpentier,
p.189, originally LE SIECLE DES LUMIERES, 1962.}
Comment by Gilad Atzmon,Israeli musician and writer.
Yes, man. I agree with every word!
It is a bit embarrassing, but Israeli prime ministers
love to be condemned by the international community. In
Israel, any foreign criticism of Israel is interpreted as
'gentile pathological anti–Semitic
behaviour'. Every leading Israeli politician learns how
to use this tool during his first days in office. The
main pattern was delivered by Ben Gurion: 'It
doesn't matter what the Goys say, what matters is what
the Jews are doing.' With this ignorant statement the
legendary Israeli PM managed to provide his voters with
an instant reminder of the history of Jewish persecution,
pushing the Jewish people deeper into their safe haven of
complete segregation and denial of the outer world.
Moreover, since in Hebrew the word gentile (goy) is a
devastating derogative, Ben Gurion’s call leads
Israelis to celebrate their superiority over the rest of
humankind. Ben Gurion's statement was a call for Israelis
to unite behind their leadership and to reject any sort
of foreign criticism.
This doctrine leaves the international community
helpless. On the one hand, lack of criticism is taken by
the Israeli public as an approval or a sign of weakness.
On the other hand, any international condemnation leads
eventually to a growth of public support toward the
political leadership. This fact might explain the
continuous shift to the right within Israeli politics.
Further, it explains the international community's
impotence against Israeli oppression and atrocities.
 In Jenin, Sharon had
committed a crime comparable to the Quibya massacre of 50
years earlier. Although the similarities are obvious,
there are differences that should be identified. In
Quibya Sharon was a platoon commander, in Jenin he had
become an elected prime minister and had committed his
crime in the name of Israeli people. As soon as
international criticism was heard, Sharon defined the
current battle as the 'existential war of the all Jewish
nation'. According to Sharon, then, the massacre in Jenin
was done not only in the name of the
Israelis but in the name of all Jewish people. Sharon
declared that very much like G. Bush he was conducting a
holy war against terror.
Sharon becomes American messenger or at least American
platoon commander. World
Jewry and the American administration have avoided public
criticism of Sharon, hence, we can conclude that Sharon
has committed his war crimes in the name of the Jewish
people and the American nation. Unless major
Rabbis stand up and firmly denounce Sharon's atrocities,
unless the American administration decides to stop
supporting the Jewish state, we
will be forced to conclude that Sharon has indeed been
acting in the name of the Jews and the American nation.
Gilad Atzmon
|
