The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing.
If you can fake that, you got it made. - Groucho
Marx
The
handstand diary
It is enough lying for a man to speak of
everything that he hears.Koran.
March28th
| |
British Soldiers Refuse to Fight
Indo-Asian
News Service
LONDON, 31 March
2003 Two British servicemen have been sent
home from the Middle East after refusing to fight
in the war against Iraq, The Sunday Times
reported. They said they would refuse to fight
because of the civilian casualties being caused
by the US-British attack. They face possible
court martial and up to two years in jail for
disobeying orders. The two British soldiers are
from 16 Air Assault Brigade, a frontline unit,
which has been engaged in heavy fighting in
southern Iraq. Their lawyer says they were
ordered to return to the brigades barracks
in Colchester, Essex, after raising their
objections earlier this month. The cases were
confirmed this weekend by Justin
Hugheston-Roberts, a solicitor advocate who
chairs Forces Law, a nationwide group of 22 law
firms that acts for service personnel and their
families. These cases are being handled by
a very experienced lawyer, he said. Gilbert
Blades, a Lincoln-based lawyer, said the Ministry
of Defense was trying to hush up the cases
because it feared a public relations disaster.
|
LETTER FROM AMERICA
Under the Patriot Act the Bush administration has seized
Iraqi government funds in the Bahamas, the Cayman
Islands, Saudi Arabia, the Netherlands and other
countries, which are believed to have been earned through
illegal oil sales. The Patriot Act allows the US to
impose sanctions on financial institutions that do not
comply. The US and UK have seized $2 billion and another
$600 million has been frozen elsewhere. Mr. Bush says
assets will be preserved for suits against Iraq for war
crimes committed against US citizens during Desert Storm.
It is of interest that one media release from the Bush
administration justifies seizure under the Patriot Act,
yet assets have been seized since 1990 and its hard
to explain why Mr. Bush had to sign an executive order to
confiscate Iraqi assets. The Patriot Act is a new piece
of legislation. It should be noted that Russia has
refused to freeze Iraqi assets, because there was no
evidence that the money had been used illegally. French
President Chirac said he would refuse to go along with
any UN proposals that would allow the Americans and
British to administer Iraq after the war. This would
legitimize the military intervention after the event.
| War in
Iraq - requirement for more troops |
| |
March 27, 2003
www.iraqwar.ruThe IRAQWAR.RU analytical
center was created recently by a group of
journalists and military experts from Russia to
provide accurate and up-to-date news and analysis
of the war against Iraq. The following is the
English translation of the IRAQWAR.RU report
based on the Russian military intelligence
reports.
[
< previous report | next report >
]
March
27, 2003, 1425hrs MSK (GMT +3), Moscow - There
has been a sharp increase in activity on the
southern front. As of 0700hrs the coalition
forces are subjected to nearly constant attacks
along the entire length of the front. The Iraqi
command took the advantage of the raging sand
storm to regroup its troops and to reinforce the
defenses along the approaches to Karabela and
An-Najaf with two large armored units (up to two
armored brigades totaling up to 200 tanks). The
Iraqi attack units were covertly moved near the
positions of the US 3rd Infantry Division
(Motorized) and the 101st Airborne Division. With
sunrise and a marginal visibility improvement the
Iraqis attacked these US forces in the flank to
the west of Karabela.
Simultaneously,
massive artillery barrages and counterattacks
were launched against units of the US 3rd
Infantry Division and the 101st Airborne Division
conducting combat operations near An-Najaf. The
situation [for the US troops] was complicated by
the fact that the continuing sand storm forced
them to group their units into battalion convoys
in order to avoid losing troops and equipment in
near zero-visibility conditions. These battalion
convoys were concentrated along the roads leading
to Karabela and An-Najaf and had only limited
defenses. There was no single line of the front;
aerial reconnaissance in these conditions was not
possible and until the very last moment the
coalition command was unaware of the Iraqi
preparations.
During
one of such attacks [the Iraqi forces] caught
off-guard a unit of the US 3rd Infantry Division
that was doing vehicle maintenance and repairs.
In a short battle the US unit was destroyed and
dispersed, leaving behind one armored personnel
carrier, a repair vehicle and two Abrams tanks,
one of which was fully operational.
At
the present time visibility in the combat zone
does not exceed 300 meters, which limits the
effectiveness of the 101st Airborne Division and
that of its 70 attack helicopters representing
the main aerial reconnaissance and ground support
force of the coalition. One of the coalition
transport helicopters crashed yesterday during
take-off. The reason for the crash was sand in
the engine compressors.
The
Iraqis were able to get in range for close combat
without losses and now fierce battles are
continuing in the areas of Karabela and An-Najaf.
The main burden of supporting the coalition
ground troops has been placed with the artillery
and ground attack aircraft. Effectiveness of the
latter is minimal due to the weather conditions.
Strikes can be delivered only against old Iraqi
targets with known coordinates, while actually
supporting the ground troops engaged in combat is
virtually impossible and attempts to do so lead
to the most unfortunate consequences.
Intercepted
radio communications show that at around 0615hrs
this morning the lead of a flight of two A-10
ground attack planes detected a convoy of armored
vehicles. Unable to see any markings identifying
these vehicles as friendly and not being able to
contact the convoy by radio the pilot directed
artillery fire to the coordinates of the convoy.
Later
it was discovered that this was a coalition
convoy. Thick layers of dust covered up the
identification markings - colored strips of cloth
in the rear of the vehicles. Electronic jamming
made radio contact impossible. First reports
indicated that the US unit lost 50 troops killed
and wounded. At least five armored vehicles have
been destroyed, one of which was an Abrams tank.
During
the past day the coalition losses in this area [
Karabela and An-Najaf ] were 18-22 killed and up
to 40 wounded. Most of the fatalities were
sustained due to unexpected attacks by the Iraqi
Special Forces against the coalition rears and
against communication sites. This is a sign of
the increasing diversionary and partisan actions
by the Iraqis.
During
the same period of time the Iraqi forces
sustained up to 100 killed, about the same number
of wounded and up to 50 captured.
Since
the beginning of the operation no more than 2000
Iraqi troops were captured by the coalition. The
majority of the captured troops were members of
regional defense [militia] units.
The
Iraqis were able to move significant
reinforcements to the area of An-Nasiriya making
it now extremely difficult for the Americans to
widen their staging areas on the left bank of the
Euphrates. Moreover, the Americans [on the left
bank of the Euphrates] may end up in a very
difficult situation if the Iraqis manage to
destroy the bridges and to separate [these US
units] from the main coalition force. The US
forces in this area consist of up to 4,000
Marines from the 1st Marine Division and
supporting units of the 82nd Airborne Division.
Currently, fighting has resumed in the
An-Nasiriya suburbs.
During
one of the Iraqi attacks yesterday against the US
positions the Iraqis for the first time employed
the "Grad" mobile multiple rocket
launch systems [MLRS]. As the result an entire US
unit was taken out of combat after sustaining up
to 40 killed and wounded as well as losing up to
7 armored vehicles.
There
are no other reports of any losses in this area [
An-Nasiriya] except for one US Marine drowning in
one of the city's water canals and another Marine
being killed by a sniper.
During
the sand storm the coalition command lost contact
with up to 4 coalition reconnaissance groups.
Their whereabouts are being determined. It is
still unknown what happened to more than 600
other coalition troops mainly from resupply,
communications and reconnaissance units
communication with which was lost during the past
24 hours.
The
situation around Basra remains unclear. The
Iraqis control the city and its suburbs, as well
as the area south of Basra and the part of the
adjacent Fao peninsula, which the British have so
far failed to take. The British forces are
blockading Basra from the west and northwest.
However, due to difficult marshy terrain crossed
by numerous waterways the British have been
unable to create a single line of front and to
establish a complete blockade of the city.
Currently main combat operations are being
launched for control of a small village near
Basra where the local airport is located. The
British field commanders report that there has
been no drop in the combat activity of the
Iraqis. On the contrary, under the cover of the
sand storm up to two battalions of the
"surrendered" Iraqi 51st Infantry
Division were moved to the Fao peninsula to
support the local defending forces.
Rumors
about an uprising by the Basra Shiite population
turned out to be false. Moreover, the Shiite
community leaders called on the local residents
to fight the "children of the Satan" -
the Americans and the British.
During
the past 24 hours the British sustained no less
than 3 killed and up to 10 wounded due to mortar
and sniper fire.
It is
difficult to estimate the Iraqi losses [in Basra]
due to limited available information. However,
some reports suggest that up to 30 Iraqi troops
were killed during the past day by artillery and
aircraft fire.
During
an attack against a coalition checkpoint in Umm
Qasr last night one British marine infantry
soldier was heavily wounded. This once again
points to the tentative nature of the British
claims of control over the town.
Information
coming from northern regions of Iraq indicates
that most of the Kurdish leaders chose not to
participate in the US war against Iraq. The
primary reason for that is the mistrust of the
Kurds toward the US. Yesterday one of the Russian
intelligence sources obtained information about a
secret agreement reached between the US and the
Turkish government. In the agreement the US,
behind the backs of the Kurds, promised Turkey
not to support in any way a formation of a
Kurdish state in this region. The US has also
promised not to prevent Turkey from sending its
troops [ to Northern Kurdistan] immediately
following [the coalition] capture of northern
Iraq.
In
essence, this gives Turkey a card-blanche to use
force for a "cleanup" in Kurdistan. At
the same time the Kurdish troops will be moved to
fight the Iraqis outside of Kurdistan, thus
rendering them unable to support their own
people.
Along
the border with Kurdistan Turkey has already
massed a 40,000-strong army expeditionary corps
that is specializing in combat operations against
the Kurds. This force remains at a 4-hour
readiness to begin combat operations.
All
of this indicates that the coalition command will
be unable to create a strong "Northern
Front" during the next 3-4 days and that the
US Marines and paratroopers in this area will
have to limit their operations to distracting the
Iraqis and to launching reconnaissance missions.
During
a meeting with the Germany's chancellor [ Gerhard
] Schroeder the heads of the German military and
political intelligence reported that the US is
doing everything possible to conceal information
on the situation in the combat zone and that the
US shows an extremely "unfriendly"
attitude. Germany's own intelligence-gathering
capabilities in this region are very limited.
This is the result of Germany, being true to its
obligations as an ally, not attempting to bolster
its national intelligence operations in the
region and not trying to separate its
intelligence agencies from the intelligence
structures of NATO and the US.
There
has been a confirmation of yesterday's reports
about the plans of the coalition command to
increase its forces fighting in Iraq. The troops
of the 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized) are
currently being airlifted to the region, while
its equipment is traveling by sea around the
Arabian Peninsula and the unloading is expected
to begin as early as by the end of tomorrow. The
Division numbers 30,000 soldiers and officers. By
the end of April up to 120,000 more US troops, up
to 500 tanks and up to 300 more helicopters will
be moved to the region.
In
addition to that, today the US President [George
W] Bush asked the British Prime-Minister [Tony]
Blair to increase the British military presence
in Iraq by a minimum of 15,000-20,000 troops.
At
the current level of combat operations and at the
current level of Iraqi resistance the coalition
may face a sharp shortage of troops and weapons
within the next 5-7 days, which will allow the
Iraqis to take the initiative. The White House
took this conclusion of the US Joint Chiefs of
Staff with great concern.
During
the past seven days of the war the US Navy
detained all ships in the Persian Gulf going to
Iraq under the US "Oil for Food"
program. Since yesterday all these ships are
being unloaded in Kuwait. Unloaded food is being
delivered by the US military to Iraq and is being
distributed as "American humanitarian
aid" and as a part of the "rebuilding
Iraq" program. These US actions have already
cause a serious scandal in the UN. The US
explained its actions by its unilateral decision
to freeze all Iraqi financial assets, including
the Iraqi financial assets with the UN. These
assets the US now considers its property and will
exercise full control over them. Captains of the
detained ships have already called these actions
by the US a "piracy."
(source:
iraqwar.ru, 03-27-03,
translated by Venik)
|
US GENERAL WITH IRAQ ROLE LINKED TO HARDLINE ISRAELIS
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/story.jsp?story=390842

Date: March 26, 2003
Contact: (917) 517-3627
NY PROTESTERS "DIE IN" UNDER BULLDOZER AT
BANK LEUMI, SHUT DOWN 5TH AVE Non-violent protest
highlights Israel's use of Iraq war as cover for new
assaults on Palestinians
PHOTOS online at http://ww3report.com/protest.html
(call for hi-res photos) VIDEO available request by phone
New York At a New York branch of Israel's Bank Leumi,
eighteen protesters locked together as a human barricade
across Fifth Avenue at 9am this morning. Covered in fake
blood, the protesters lay piled in the street at the foot
of a mock Caterpillar bulldozer. The act of civil
disobedience referenced the murder of US peace activist
Rachel Corrie by an Israel army Caterpillar bulldozer in
Gaza earlier this month.
Chanting "Occupation is a crime, from Iraq to
Palestine," the protesters shut down Fifth Avenue
for over an hour, refusing to let New York go about its
business while the US war on Iraq places the lives of
Palestinians at greater risk than ever.
Police became stained with red liquid as they arrested
the die-in participants. Sixteen protesters were roughly
taken into custody, adding to the ranks of the nearly
1000 peaceful anti-war demonstrators violently removed
from New York streets over the last several weeks. Video
witnesses recorded police officers dragging protesters
painfully across the street. Protesters were also
subjected to violence from onlookers, who kicked, spat at
and threw things at the peaceful protesters as they lay
motionless in the street.
"This war is realizing the worst fears of
Palestinians," said protester Mark Field, a New York
activist against the illegal Israeli occupation of
Palestine. "While the world's attention is focused
on Iraq and Arabs are cast as the enemy, Israel has
stepped up its assaults on Palestinian towns. Under cover
of war, Israel is freer than ever to label every
Palestinian a terrorist, to detain civilians
indefinitely, to demolish civilian homes and seize
additional Palestinian lands."
"Bank Leumi is a pillar of Israeli finance, with
$51 billion in assets. The illegal occupation of
Palestinian towns and the killing of civilians are
supported by Bank Leumiâs investments in the Israeli
military economy," said protester Rachel Fineberg, a
Jewish human rights activist. "Enough is enough
we're shutting this war machine down."
"We are human rights activists many of us have
seen the incredible violations of Palestinian human
rights first-hand," said protester Lila Greene, an
activist who visited the West Bank to support non-violent
Palestinian organizing in 2002. "We refuse to allow
Israel to remove us as witnesses to war crimes. The
Israeli army killed Rachel Corrie, they killed Iain Hook
and they regularly kill Palestinian non-violent
organizers but they can't bury the truth. Neither Israel
nor the United States can commit war crimes in secret
anymore. The whole world is watching."

LETTER FROM ISRAEL:Menahem Finkelstein,
the military attorney general, is responsible for not
opening inquiries into innumerable war crimes committed
by Israeli soldiers. Recently he has decided to avoid an
investigation of the killing of Rachel Corrie. The
bulldozer driver will hence not be brought to trial. The
very same Finkelstein, however, has been relenlessly
persecuting conscientious objectors - draft resisters and
reservists who refuse to take part in such war crimes.
None of these COs intends to give up on his
moral principles. On the contrary, there is a growing
number of refuseniks!
We wish to remind you of our weekly vigil:
Every Friday we hold a vigil in front of the military
attorney general's home, in support of the occupation
resisters. We protest against the repeated imprisonment
of draft resisters, as well as against the legal
legitimacy given to the real criminals.From
parent of Conscientious Objector.

Speaking about George W. Bush,George Galloway,
British Member of Parliament,said that he was
unimpressive. However, the US has stirred up a vast
amount of hatred against itself by this swaggering
arrogance of the intellectually limited President,
roaring like a bull in a bomber jacket in aircraft
hangars to young men and women of the American armed
forces who, although they know very little of the world,
are ready to get out there and kill.
- Landstuhl, America's largest
military hospital outside the United States, is
currently treating 72 patients from
"Operation Iraqi Freedom," 24 of them
wounded in combat. Five are in intensive care.
The hospital is expanding to 320 beds, doubling
its normal capacity.www.rense.com
There have been further clashes around the town of
Nasiriya, with unconfirmed reports that dozens of US
Marines have been injured in an exchange of fire with
other American troops.
The French news agency AFP reported that 37 Marines
were injured, some critically, in the "friendly
fire" incident. BBC March 27th
Either take up your axe and strike
like Ali at the gates of Khaybar.
Or join these thorns with a rose:
bring your fire to God's light in order that
your fire will disappear in His light,
and all your thorns become roses.
(Rumi - Mathnawi II, 1244-1246 - 'Rumi Daylight' -
Camille & Kabir Helminski)
VIENNA, Austria March 26
Hans Blix, the U.N. chief weapons inspector, has
voiced criticism and disappointment that his inspectors
had to pull out from Iraq before completing their task.
In an interview with the Austrian magazine News at
U.N. headquarters in New York, Blix said, "I am
disappointed that we could not stay longer to finish our
work." Excerpts of the interview, to be published
Thursday, were released to Austrian media on Wednesday.
"We had the door slammed in our faces," said
Blix, the head of the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and
Inspection Commission, known as UNMOVIC. "Three and
a half months were not enough, nor do I believe that U.N.
resolution 1441 meant it that way."
Blix described as problematic his cooperation with the
U.S. government, saying "I even had a sense, shortly
before the (U.S.) decision to go to war, that they were
irritated by our work."
According to the excerpts, Blix said Washington tried
to obtain results to its liking, adding "whenever we
could not do that, there was criticism."
He reportedly said it was unlikely that Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein would use weapons of mass
destruction.

- Arab TV Crew Says Found
40 Dead US Soldiers
The following appeared in the letters section of
WhatReallyHappened.com
3-26-3
- Sanwa ata Mosahra reporting. A
film crew from al-Minar TV, a television network
of Lebanon, stumbled across the bodies of about
40 US soldiers scattered in the desert outside
Maseriah. Ali Fawsua a camera man for al-Minar
said "It was obvious the soldiers had been
in a major battle as there was empty ammunition
casing everywhere".
-
- "We searched around but could
not find any dead Iraqi soldiers and must be
thinking they took their dead and injured away
from the battle" he added.
-
- "We called on our satellite
phone to our base camp and told them what we had
found and they told the Americans where we were
located".
-
- "Soon some American
helicopters came to us and the Americans took all
our camera and recording equipment and smashed
it. They told us to leave the area and say
nothing of this finding".
-
- "When we arrived back at our
base to the south there were American military
police everywhere and they destroyed all of our
equipment and told us to leave Iraq
immediately".
-
- al-Minar has lodged a complaint
with the IJCO and US with a claim for
compensation for the many thousands dollars of
destroyed equipment
A US delegation arrived in
Amman in its way to Baghdad for ceasefire negotiations
Abu Dhabi, Alittihad
Daily, 3/26/2003 -- The UAE leading semi-official daily
newspaper, Alittihad, reported today that a US government
delegation has arrived in Amman, Jordan, yesterday in its
way to Baghdad for negotiations with the Iraqi government
about an immediate ceasefire.
A diplomatic source told
Alittihad that the US government delegation included four
leading members of Congress as well as the daughter of
the US Vice President, Dick Cheney, representing the US
Department of State, where she works as an Assistant to
the Deputy of the Secretary of State for Middle Eastern
Affairs.
excerpt from Ha'aretz:After the fall of the Taliban in
Afghanistan, Israel submitted a request to
the U.S. Administration to participate in an
international conference for rebuilding the country,
which took place in Tokyo. The Arab
participants in the conference were not
pleased about this, nor were the Afghans themselves happy
about receiving assistance from Israel.
Finally the U.S. Administration decided
Israel would stay out of the conference.Marc Grossman,
under secretary of state for political affairs, whose
name has already been mentioned as one of the candidates
to take charge of the rebuilding of Iraq, was asked .
"Will recognizing Israel be the first thing the
Iraqis do? I have no idea,
but I certainly hope this will be among the
first things they do."
March 24th2003
This
woman,wounded, has lost two sons last night.




Letter from america
In the US, we had
over 1000 people arrested in San Francisco in one day...
so many that the jails weren't big enough to hold them
all and they had to take them to temporary holding
facilities. We had police checkpoints across the country
and random searches and seizures last week. We learned
that the entity that monopolizes the US radio airwaves is
for some reason staunchly pro war, paying for pro war
rallies and banishing the likes of the Dixie Chicks from
the airwaves with a "no play" order because of
an anti war comment. The message is clear to all high
profile individuals. Oppose the war and your career is
over. The US has entered a state of decline, let there be
no doubt about that. Freedom of speech and the right to
dissent is on the wane as the power brokers attempt to
hold things together.
The problem is that as
I've been saying, this war on IRAQ is just the opening
salvo, and I expect things to continue to get worse. By
"worse," I mean a continued trend towards less
ability to dissent and more control over your
"reality." One important point I have to make
is that all of this control costs money... and lots of
it. Worse than that, as control is transferred from the
citizens to the government, productivity goes down. In my
mind it is very much like the reverse of what happened in
the Soviet Union. The free markets and capitalism are now
being constrained by increased government control in all
areas. This is a blow to free markets and capitalism in
general. This seizure and subsequent occupation of IRAQ
is going to be incredibly expensive. This will probably
cause more civil unrest at some point going forward
because many Americans already know what's up and don't
like what they see. That combined with more and more
people being unable to pay their bills is a toxic mix. We
saw a preview of that with the arrests this week. You can
tell from the interviews with protesters if you're lucky
enough to see one.
The San Francisco
protest and mass arrest of over 1000 people barely made
the news on CNN. It was covered more by foreign news
services. What does that tell you? It's an indicator of
the extent of the control over your reality.
Smart bombs,
obtuse commentators
By Gideon Levy
It's been a long time since we've seen such enthusiasm.
The television studios are filled to overflowing with
major generals and brigadier generals who are terribly
impressed with the war in Iraq and attempt to infect the
viewers with their delight. Veteran warmongers, some of
whom are responsible for past wars of choice and for
appalling fiascos, hallucinatory operations and
unnecessary bloodshed, are now the voice of national
reason. Avigdor Ben Gal, for instance, a senior commander
in the Lebanon War, without batting an eye called on the
IDF to find an immediate "pretext" under cover
of the Iraq war for returning to Lebanon. Others who
dragged us into unnecessary adventurism, and their
colleagues who turned the IDF into a brutal occupation
army in the territories, are now our only national
commentators.
It was apparent already during the waiting period that
the lengthy anticipation was hard on them: They
considered every postponement a terrible mistake and
every debate about the justification for the war was
heresy. Now that the forces are finally on their way,
their enthusiasm bursts forth, not merely about the very
outbreak of the war, but about the sophisticated
equipment being used. The smart bombs and the guided
missiles, the satellite navigation and the turbofan
engines, the Stealth bombers and the mega-bombs are
firing their imagination.
A smile akin to that of a child describing his new toys
spreads on their face as they describe the magical allure
of the American power of destruction. Former air force
commanders, who apparently find it difficult to give up
their posts, describe horrific bombing runs or flying
extermination machines as if they were works of art.
Brigadier General (res.) Aryeh Mizrahi outdid himself in
one of these countless discussions when he pulled from
his pocket a small model cluster bomb - apparently
manufactured by Israel Military Industries (of which he
is the chairman) - and with glittering eyes told viewers
that the Americans were using that very weapon. He
explained how it breaks up into a vast number of
"bomblets" and how it "wreaked havoc"
in the Lebanon War, "pulverizing" whole armored
battalions, and that "everyone who saw the results
in Lebanon was appalled" - it was positively
"raining steel," he said.
The small, smart bomb that Mizrahi brought was passed
from hand to hand in the studio and the elderly generals
fondled it reverently. It was an unforgettable spectacle.
Of course, none of them bothered to point out the killing
and destruction that a bomb like this can cause among
innocent civilians, nor did anyone wonder what happens to
a society
whose spokesmen get so pathologically excited by weapons
and killing

nuclear weapons?
Hi,
My brother is an ex-Marine (I know - no
such thing). He told me months ago (rather casually, I'm
afraid) - when we were arguing over the phone about Bush
possibly using nukes on Iraq - that these were just
low-grade depleted uranium nukes they were talking about
using - NOT the mushroom-cloud generating nukes that we
traditionally think of when we talk about nukes - e.g.,
the ones that were used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki...
Besides, he told me - the US had ALREADY used many of
these low-grade depleted uranium nukes in Iraq, during
the FIRST Persian Gulf war, back in the early 90's. He
seemed to believe that this was common knowledge amongst
the military, and most ex-military personnel. He said the
only difference between Bush I and Bush II was that Bush
II was being straight up front about the use of these
weapons (as if that was something to commend him
for...!!!).
So - I'm very inclined to believe this
piece of scoop."
To which I replied:
"Thank you for sharing with us
this insight of a man on the spot.Please thank your
brother too.I am quite certain that your brother has had
solid information that nuclear weapons were used,
especially in the landings on the Kuwaiti shore, see
below."However, I believe your brother was referring
to a LOW-YIELD Nuclear Weapon, rather than a LOW-GRADE
weapon?
"It is almost impossible to get
a fission reaction going with U-238 except under immense
neutron flux, it being, under normal conditions, a
FISSIONABLE material, but NOT a FISSILE material, the
latter class being capable of spontaneous fission under
certain quantitative and kinetic material density
increases and other considerations, as is possible with
the traditional U-235 and Plutonium-239.
"However, U-238 or so-called
"Depleted Uranium", i.e., U-238 fairly leached
of its fissile U-235 content, IS fissionable under heavy
neutron flux, which jumps it up into Plutonium 239 when
it is deliberately used for the casing on the FUSION
aggregate of a thermonulear weapon (Hydrogen Bomb).
"What I believe your brother
meant, are LOW-YIELD nuclear weapons, i.e., of
(relatively) low energy output, (between a few tons' and
a few hundred tons' TNT-equivalent) which, due to clever
design, such as the use of Red Mercury or Mercuric-Stibic
Heptoxide (Hg2Sb2O7) as carrier and tamper for Pu-239
incorporated into its crystalline structure, combined
with electromagnetic implosion using heavy fields
generated by FCGs (Flux-Compression (explosive)
Generators), can make even relatively miniscule amounts
of Pu-239 fission, and are also much more efficient in
the percentage of fissile material they manage to fission
when they are initiated, so fallout is low, and the
"Neutron Bomb" which is something like a very
small nuke, produces a high-density neutron flux which
can penetrate armor and also underground facilities and
killed, most likely, the Iraqi soldiers in their dugouts
in Kuwait, before they were bulldozed over.
"THAT IS WHY THE USA HUNG A
24-HOUR NEWS BLACKOUT OF THE KUWAITI LANDINGS WHEN THEY
WENT IN.
"IT IS ALSO WHY THEY ANNOUNCED,
FAR IN ADVANCE, THAT THEY WOULD BE DROPPING
"FUEL-AIR BOMBS".
"As a real fuel-air bomb, not
the baloney of an NH4NO3/Al slurry mentioned in the
article I quoted, makes a fireball dissimilar mainly in
temperature from a nuclear weapon, giving this sort of
cover-story makes it easy for, say, reporters, to believe
they have witnessed a fuel-air explosion, when in fact it
was a very small, LOW-YIELD, nuclear weapon and very
likely a Neutron Bomb, whose original parameters, by the
way, were to be applicable almost in selective urban
environments (!), the air-blast being of very limited
strength and relying on the neutron rain to kill living
organisms while leaving the physical infrastructure of
weapons and buildings intact.
"Thanks for your information,
and I must hope that someone will take up this theme --
or are all the good sites and news-services either afraid
of the governments, or even on their side?
George"
I laid out my case in a letter to an
international socialist website, urging them to address
this issue:
"Dear Editor,I recently received
an unconfirmable report of weapons used by the USA in
Afghanistan, which melted rifles in the hands of dead
soldiers:
Perpetual Death From America(see this issue of The Handstand on
navigator column)
By Mohammed Daud Miraki, MA, MA, PhD
Afghan-American Freelance Academic
Mdmiraki@ameritech.net
2-24-3
http://www.rense.com/general35/perp.htm
Many survivors died within a short time
thereafter.
Having once been interested in these
sorts of things, I know the duration and energy output of
a fuel-air or "thermobaric" bomb produces far
too low an energy density for this phenomenon to occur.
As America's intention to use
thermbaric bombs was announced some days in advance of
their actual application, I pondered at the time if this
were not a cover-story, much as the cover-story to the
first Alamogordo test, to explain away in advance actual
testing of tactical nuclear bunker-busters in
Afghanistan.
Since the reports of melted weapons
have surfaced, I urge you please, to push this theme, as,
if it were exposed as being a fact, the adverse publicity
would discredit the United States and Britain, and also
prevent further usage of these weapons, should the war
against the hapless population of Iraq go ahead.
Thank you for your attention,
George Paxinos"
I did not even receive a reply.
Whereas, if we go to the
above-mentioned article by Dr Miraki, we find [emphasis
added]:
'Dr. Wazir continued:
"These are only three examples.
There have been other cases where we suspect chemical
weapons have been used. Most of the victims have had
respiratory problems and internal bleeding for which
there is no apparent cause." (Khalifa.com, October
30, 2001)
"At the fighting front north of
Kabul, where Taliban forces were pounded night and day,
many dead Taliban soldiers had no visible injuries except
blood flowing out of their mouths, internal bleeding
consistent with uranium based and chemical weapons.
Furthermore, many dead Taliban soldiers had severe
discoloration of the skin, orange, without being burned, while
others had their rifles melted in their hands. This
aroused suspicion among Taliban and others that weapons
used by the US-UK military were not conventional weapons.
Many Taliban soldiers that survived the bombing in the
north have died after returning to their native villages
in the south and southeast of the country. They had no
physical injury upon their death, however, died from
internal bleeding and other bizarre symptoms including
uncontrolled vomiting, diarrhea, and blood loss in urine
and stool. Their families were shocked with disbelieves.
"Another bizarre, yet tragic
scene was reported near Rish-Khor military base in Kabul.
Multiple witnesses reported seeing dead birds on tree
branches with blood coming out of their mouths. As one
witness put it:
"'We were amazed to see all
these birds sitting quietly on [tree] branches; but when
we shook the tree the birds fell down and we saw blood
coming out of their mouths. Then we climbed the trees to
see those that were still stuck on tree branches, all of
them had bled from their mouths. Two of the birds
appeared to be partly melted into the trees
branches'."
Friends, since when has a fuel-air bomb
suddenly developed the energy-densityof temperature AND
duration, to cause effects like these?
Facit is, if we do not react, and that
soon, to stop this madness of the pre-emptive use of
tactical nuclear weapons in unilateral
genocide-for-corporate-profit, disguised, well in
advance, by corrupt media parroting disinformative
blatherings about stuff most of us do not have the
background to understand, we are deservedly all doomed to
take what is coming down at us in a mad rush, our
enslavement to corporate killers, to whom no life is
sacrosanct, but only a cipher to corporate profit ends.
And moreso to our everlasting shame as
a species, when that genocide is carried out against a
population in which over 50% are children under the age
of 15 years, and the rest mainly women and the aged, all
sick from the first round of Uranium 238 pollution that
has poisoned their countryside and corrupted their genes,
all done by the only superpower left on this planet, with
the most-devastating weapons of mass destruction ever
conceived by Man, at the behest of power-insane
politicians with extant corporate ties, already doling
out lucrative contracts to their buddies in advance of
their intended slaughter, and carried out by macho
military men with deep-rooted psychic hangups in a
ghastly overblown Thelma-and-Louise parody that is so
sick, it could never even be shown to the public as
satirical horror-movie in open cinemas.
GEORGE PAXINOS Copyright
2003: InformationClearingHouse.info.

On the forth day of the 1982 Israeli attack on Lebanon,
I
crossed the border at a lone spot near Metulla and looked
for the front, which had already reached the outskirts of
Sidon. I was driving my private car, accompanied only by
a woman photographer.
We passed a dozen Shiite villages and were
received everywhere with great joy. We extracted
ourselves only with great difficulty from hundreds of
villagers, each one insisting that we have coffee at
their home. On the previous days, they had showered the
soldiers with rice. A few months
later I joined an army convoy going in the opposite
direction, from Sidon to Metulla. The soldiers
were now wearing bulletproof vests and helmets, many were
on the verge of panic. What had
happened?
The Shiites received the Israeli soldiers as liberators.
When they realized that they had come to stay as
occupiers, they started to kill
them. When the Israeli troops
entered Lebanon, the Shiites were a down-trodden,
powerless community, held in contempt by all the
others. After a year of fighting the occupiers,
they became a political and military power. The Shiite
Hizbullah is the only military force in the Arab world
that has beaten the mighty Israeli
army. Sharon is the real
father of the Shiite force in Lebanon. Bush may well
become the father of Shiite power in Iraq. The Shiites,
60% of the Iraqi population, have been until now
down-trodden and powerless. When they will realize that
the Americans intend to stay, they will start a deadly
guerilla. Bush does not intend to leave Iraq, as Sharon
did not intend to leave Lebanon.
Then what? America will argue that Iran, the great Shiite
neighbor, is behind the Shiite guerilla. In Iran there is
a lot
of oil. That's the next target.
By Uri Avnery©
- Iraqi Information Minister
Mohammed Said Al-Sahhaf said Friday night's
bombing blitz on Baghdad had wounded 207
civilians, most of them women and children.
-
- He said the casualties, being
treated in five different hospitals around the
capital, were "hit in their homes".
-
- The International Committee of the
Red Cross (ICRC) could only say Saturday it had
reports of "many wounded" in Baghdad,
as its teams fanned out to check on hospitals in
the Iraqi capital following the latest round of
air raids.
-
- Sahhaf granted a late-night tour
of the bombed sites to a small group of reporters
and vented his anger at US leaders, including
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld whom he called a
"criminal dog".

protest in cairo
The top National Security Council official R.
Beers,in thewar on terror, resigned
this week Are the bosses jumping ship lest they be held
accountable for such Deception,
Deprivations of Rights, Treason and Violations of
thePublic Trust when the TRUTH is fully out?
TOP ANTI TERROR BOSS RESIGNS - SAYS WAR ON IRAQ IS NO
LONGER "WAR ON TERROR"
WHOSE WAR IS THIS ??? STOP THE LIES !!!
Randy said that he was 'just tired' and did not have an
interest in adding the stress that would come with a war
with Iraq," thesource said.
The source said that the concern by the administration
about low morale in the intelligence community led
national security adviser Condoleezza Rice to ask Beers
twice during an exit
interview whether the resignation was a protest against
the war with Iraq. The source said that
although Beers insisted it was not, the tone of the
interview concerned Rice enough that she felt she had to
ask the question twice.
"This is a very intriguing decision (by
Beers)," said author and intelligence expert James
Bamford. "There is a predominant belief in the
intelligence community that an invasion of Iraq will
cause more terrorism than it will prevent. There is also
a tremendous amount of embarrassment by intelligence
professionals that there have been so many lies out of
the administration -- by the president, (Vice President
Dick) Cheney and (Secretary of State Colin) Powell --
over Iraq."
Bamford cited a recent address by President Bush that
cited documents, whichallegedly proved Iraq was
continuing to pursue a nuclear program, that were later
shown to be forgeries.
"It is absurd that the president of the United
States mentioned in a speech before the world information
from phony documents and no one got fired," Bamford
said. "That alone has offended intelligence
professionals throughout the services."

protesters in san francisco
(subsequently over 1,000 were arrested)
THIS IS AN URL
FOR ANTI-WAR SITES:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/antiwar/subsection/0,12809,884056,00.html
After the war erupted on Thursday
morning, the Vatican lashed out at the US, saying it
"deplored" the
interruption of diplomatic efforts to resolve the
conflict peacefully



SPANISH PROTESTERS

Dear
Raed(Letter from Baghdad)
Dear Raed...To end this rant, a word
about Islamic fundis/wahabisim/qaeda and all that.
Do you know when the sight of women veiled from top to
bottom became common in cities in Iraq? Do you know when
the question of segregation between boys and girls became
red hot? When tribal law replaced THE LAW? When Wahabi
became part of our vocabulary?
It only happened after the Gulf War. I think it
was Cheney or Albright who said they will bomb Iraq back
to the stone age, well you did. Iraqis have never
accepted religious extremism in their lives. They still
dont. Wahabis in their short dishdasha are still
looked upon as sheep who have strayed from the herd. But
they are spreading. The combination of poverty/no
work/low self esteem and the bitterness of seeing people
who rose to riches and power without any real merit but
having the right family name or connection shook the
whole social fabric. Situations which would have been
unacceptable in the past are being tolerated today.
They call it al hamla al imania the
religious campaign of course it was supported by
the government, pumping them with words like poor
in this life, rich in heaven kept the people quiet.
Or the other side of the coin is getting paid by Wahabi
organizations. Come pray and get paid, no joke, dead
serious. If the government cant give you a job run
to the nearest mosque and they will pay and support you.
This never happened before, it is outrageous. But what
are people supposed to do? thir government is denied
funds to pay proper wages and what they get is funneled
into their pockets. So please stop telling me about the
fundis, never knew what they are never would have seen
them in my streets.....
boycott
the dollar
"The [US]
Federal Reserve's greatest nightmare is that OPEC will
switch its
international transactions from a dollar standard to a
euro standard. Iraq actually made this switch in Nov.
2000 (when the euro was
worth around 80 cents), and has actually made off like
a bandit considering the dollar's steady depreciation
against the euro.
"Saddam sealed his fate when he decided to switch to
the euro in late 2000 (and
later converted his $10 billion reserve fund at the
UN to euros) - at that point, another manufactured Gulf
War become inevitable
under Bush II.
"One of the dirty little secrets of today's
international order is that the rest
of the globe could topple the United States from
its hegemonic status whenever they so choose with a
concerted abandonment of the
dollar standard.
"This is America's preeminent, inescapable Achilles
Heel for now and the
foreseeable future. That such a course hasn't been
pursued
to date bears more relation to the fact that other
Westernised, highly developed
nations haven't any interest to undergo the great
disruptions which would follow, but it could assuredly
take place in the event
that the consensus view coalesces of the United
States as any sort of 'rogue' nation."
The Guardian February 26, 2003
Battle of the currencies - The real reasons for the war
on Iraq
by W Clark

A LEGAL OPINION Andy Grossman
> Having been professionally present during the
negotiation of many
> declarations and agreements, I can say that the
ambiguity built into
> them is intentional; and that future State
Department and FCO legal
> analyses arguing (rightly or wrongly, that's not the
point of this
> message) that 1441 is a valid basis for action would
have been in the
> minds of their diplomats when 1441 was agreed.
>
> I would say that the argument is scarcely
propaganda, but rather
> advocacy and diplomacy. This is their job;
politicians may be (indeed
> may be supposed to be) hypocrites, but diplomats are
not: they are
> career reporters and advocates.
>
> "What international [law] is, is not the norms
in the charter and their
> interpration but what those with power says it
is."
>
> Not so. International law is based on consensus.
(It's enforcement is
> based on "what those with power say[ ] it
is") When I was studying
> international law, under the sainted (almost
literally: he was murdered)
> Wolfgang Friedmann, there were those in my class who
ridiculed the whole
> concept of "international law" as
irrelevant. Well, maybe in the context
> of Vietnam, and its development as victor's justice
following WW II, it
> was something less than "law".
>
> International law has largely been honored with a
nod to universal
> public opinion. The elitism inherent in modern
politics, and the
> re-creation of a super-wealthy aristocracy
(consisting, now, of the CEOs
> of major enterprises, paid tens or hundreds of
millions of dollars in
> salary and benefits, as described by Prof. Paul
Krugman, see
> http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/20/magazine/20INEQUALITY.html ) that had
> not been known since the early 20th Century, implies
unilateralism.
>
> Andy Grossman
> LLB, Docteur en droit
> Member, NY & DC Bars
> FSO (retired)
>

FROM
A LETTER rACHEL cORRIE SENT TO HER mom
Anyway, I'm rambling.
Just want to write to my Mom and tell her that
I'm witnessing this chronic, insidious genocide and I'm
really
scared, and questioning my fundamental belief in the
goodness of
human nature. This has to stop. I think it is a good idea
for us all
to drop everything and devote our lives to making this
stop. I don't
think it's an extremist thing to do anymore. I still
really want to
dance around to Pat Benatar and have boyfriends and make
comics for
my coworkers. But I also want this to stop. Disbelief and
horror is
what I feel. Disappointment. I am disappointed that this
is the base
reality of our world and that we, in fact, participate in
it. This is
not at all what I asked for when I came into this world.
This is not
at all what the people here asked for when they came into
this world.
This is not the world you and Dad wanted me to come into
when you
decided to have me. This is not what I meant when I
looked at Capital
Lake and said: "This is the wide world and I'm
coming to it." I did
not mean that I was coming into a world where I could
live a
comfortable life and possibly, with no effort at all,
exist in
complete unawareness of my participation in genocide.
More big
explosions somewhere in the distance outside.

JOE SMITH EYEWITNESS ACCOUNT
United States citizen from Kansas City, MO, USA, born 25
April 1981.
20March 2003
My name is Joseph Smith, I am 21
years old and from Kansas City,
Missouri, USA. I have been
working with the International Solidarity Movement (ISM)
in Rafah
for over two months and plan to
stay for at least one more. I then plan to do peace work
for one
month in Israel before returning
to the United States. Once home, I will attempt to spread
the word
about what is happening in
Palestine and in Rafah, through speaking tours and media
work. I
will also be active in organizing
demonstrations and other events in attempts to apply
pressure and
raise awareness about this
conflict and other race and war issues. I plan to
continue my
college education in the fall, as a
junior at Grinnell College in Grinnell, IA. I will study
history and
theatre.
ISM is a Palestinian-lead grassroots organization
designed to work
with international volunteers
to partake in non-violent direct action resistance to the
Israeli
occupation. We work and live in
Palestinian communities, and get a first-hand account of
the
violence to which they are subjected
every day by the Israeli military. We are in solidarity
with them,
as we share in their suffering and
take some of the risks that they are unfortunately forced
to live
with. It is important for us to show
that the world has not forgotten these people, and that
individuals
from all over the world are willing
to interrupt their comfortable lives to come and risk
themselves for
the sake of Palestinians. Through
this work we attempt to make links between Palestine and
the outside
world. We use our personal
contacts, the international media, and our embassies to
draw
international attention to the
Palestinian plight. And we work as observers of the
immense human
rights violations being
committed by Israel, and document these atrocities with
established
human rights organizations.
Indeed, sometimes we are the only internationals present
in this
area, in fact this is true for Rafah,
as international media and UN officials are afraid to
live and work
here.
I chose to come to Palestine and work with ISM because I
felt it was
one of the best ways for
me to use my privilege as a white middle class American
male to
directly serve impoverished
people of color who are under-privileged due to the
Israeli and
other Western governments,
especially mine. I have dedicated my life to serving such
people, as
I believe my over-privilege
is a direct result of their under-privilege. I have
benefited from
their suffering, and this must stop.
16 March, 2003
11:00-13:00
We were split into two groups, one working as human
shields for
water workers at the Canada
water well in Tele Sultan and the other doing the same
for
electricity workers in Hay Salaam.
It is dangerous for these workers to work near the
boarder, as
Israeli tanks patrol it and will often
shoot at any Palestinian in sight, including civilian
workers and
playing children.
13:00-13:30
Hay Salaam activists noticed that two Israeli Army
bulldozers and
one tank have entered onto
Palestinian civilian property near the border and are
demolishing
farmland and other already damaged
structures. The military machinery was severely
threatening near-by
homes, so the 3 activists went
up onto the roof of one home, and then called for others
to come.
13:30-14:00
I arrived, and one of the three activists in the house
joined me on
the ground. The bulldozers
moved away from the house activists were occupying, so
the other two
joined us, and we began
to disrupt the work of the bulldozers. We moved slowly at
first,
just standing near to their work,
and then sat and stood on a partially built house that
looked
threatened. One bulldozer began to
damage part of the structure on which we were standing,
so a
Scottish activist began standing
and sitting on the edge of the structure, and made it
impossible for
the bulldozer to work without
injuring him. At this point, Rachel and the two other
activists
joined us from the well, with a
banner and a megaphone. Rachel and a British activist
were wearing
jackets that were fluorescent
orange and had reflective stripping.
14:00-15:00
Our press office informed the British and American
embassies that
Israeli Army bulldozers were
behaving aggressively, and were endangering the lives of
British and
American citizens, but they
took no action.
The bulldozer continued to try and further damage the
structure and
we continued to get in its
way. At one point, a concrete pillar almost fell on the
Scottish
activist, but he moved just in time.
We were worried that the two houses behind this structure
would be
targeted, so we placed one
activist on the roof of each house. I went onto the roof
of the
house closest to the structure.
Rachel and two other activists began interfering with the
other
bulldozer, which was attempting
to destroy grass and other plants on what used to be
farmland. They
stood and sat in its path,
and though it would drive very close to them, and even
move the
earth on which they were sitting,
it always stopped in time to avoid injuring them. After
about 10
minutes, both bulldozers gave up
on their work and withdrew to the boarder, and parked to
face the
houses, one on each side of
the tank. I stayed on the roof, as the rest of the
activists
gathered to face the military machinery,
and held an "International Solidarity Movement"
banner, while Rachel
shouted at them with a
megaphone. Soldiers in the tank yelled obscenities at us,
and told
us to leave. They fired a few
warning shots at the ground, and then fired a teargas
canister. The
wind blew the gas east of us,
and never came close to a single activist. After a few
more minutes
of this face off, the bulldozers
began driving east together on the boarder strip, and we
thought
they might have given up. Just in
case, five of the activists walked on the Palestinian
land, and
followed the bulldozers. The other
activist and I came down out of our houses. He joined the
others,
and I joined Rachel who had
stayed with the tank in order to speak to the soldiers
over the
megaphone. They requested that
she approach the tank, but she refused due their rude and
aggressive
behavior.
15:00-16:00
We noticed that the bulldozers had incurred back onto
Palestinian
land, and the six activists were
opposing them, so we left the tank to join them. During
this round
of opposition, one bulldozer pushed
Will, an American activist, up against a pile of barbed
wire.
Fortunately, the bulldozer stopped and
withdrew just in time to avoid injuring him seriously,
but we had to
dig him out of the rubble, and unhook
his clothing from the wire. The tank approached to see if
he was ok.
One soldier stuck his head out of
the tank to see, and he looked quite shocked and
dumbfounded, but
said nothing.
16:00-16:45
We climbed onto some already damaged structures that were
threatened, and kept the bulldozers
from incurring any further onto Palestinian land. The
bulldozer
drivers began waving at us, making
faces, laughing, and shouting what sounded like lewd
comments. One
even removed his helmet and
posed for a picture, which unfortunately didn't turn out.
16:45-17:00
One bulldozer, serial number 949623, began to work near
the house of
a physician who is a friend
of ours, and in whose house Rachel and other activists
often stayed.
While we occupied the other
structures directly west (the closest was less than 5
meters away
and the furthest was less than
25 meters away), Rachel sat down in the pathway of the
bulldozer. I
was elevated about 2 meters
above the ground, and had a clear view of the action
happening about
20 meters away. Still wearing
her fluorescent jacket, she sat down at least 15 meters
in front of
the bulldozer, and began waving
her arms and shouting, just as activists had successfully
done
dozens of times that day. The
bulldozer continued driving forward headed straight for
Rachel. When
it got so close that it was
moving the earth beneath her, she climbed onto the pile
of rubble
being pushed by the bulldozer.
She got so high onto it that she was at eye-level with
the cab of
the bulldozer. Her head and upper
torso were above the bulldozer's blade, and the bulldozer
driver and
co-operator could clearly see her.
Despite this, he continued forward, which pulled her legs
into the
pile of rubble, and pulled her down
out of view of the diver. If he'd stopped at this point,
he may have
only broken her legs, but he
continued forward, which pulled her underneath the
bulldozer. We ran
towards him, and waved our
arms and shouted, one activist with the megaphone. But
the bulldozer
driver continued forward, until
Rachel was underneath the central section of the
bulldozer. At this
point, it was more than clear that
she was nowhere but underneath the bulldozer, there was
simply
nowhere else she could have been,
as she had not appeared on either side of the bulldozer,
and could
not have stayed in front of it that
long without being crushed. Despite the obviousness of
her position,
the bulldozer began to reverse,
without lifting its blade, and drug the blade over her
body again.
He continued to reverse until he was
on the boarder strip, about 100 meters away, and left her
crushed
body in the sand. Three activists
ran to her and began administering first-responder
medical
treatment. Her body was in a mangled
position, her face was very bloody, and her skin was
turning blue.
She said, "My back is broken!",
but nothing else. The three activists took care to keep
her neck
straight, and turned her to her side
in case of vomit or blood from the mouth. She was showing
signs of
brain hemridging (I found out
later from the British medical activist) so they elevated
her head
in order to allow it to drain blood,
as this injury was more serious than her spinal injury.
They
continued to talk to her in attempts to
keep her conscience.
The other bulldozer, which had been working about 30
meters to the
west, abandoned work and
withdrew to the boarder strip, and parked about 10 meters
to the
west of the murderous bulldozer.
The tank came over to see what had happened, and I
shouted that they
had run over our friend,
and that she may die. The soldiers in the tank never
spoke to us,
asked us any questions or offered
us any help. They simply talked on their radio and then
withdrew to
the border strip and parked between
the two bulldozers.
One activist ran to the doctor's house less than 5 meters
away to
ask for his help and to call an
ambulance. I also called a Palestinian friend and asked
him to call
an ambulance, as our Orange
network phones cannot dial the emergency number. An
activist used
the megaphone to inform the
soldiers that a Palestinian ambulance was on the way, and
demanded
that they not shoot at the
paramedics. He also told them that a Palestinian doctor
is present
and is going to come out into
the area.
The doctor came out and suggested that we move her, but
it was clear
that we could not. He used
cotton swabs to dab some of the blood coming from her
face.
17:00-17:15
The ambulance arrived. The Palestinian paramedics risked
their lives
to come out onto the boarder
strip and put her onto a stretcher. We worked as human
shields for
them, and tried to make it difficult
for the tank to fire at the ambulance workers as they
have at many
others in the past. While the
paramedics loaded her onto a stretcher, one activist
suggested that
I get a good picture that clearly
showed the serial number of the bulldozer responsible. I
walked all
the way out to the boarder strip,
passed the tank, and began photographing the bulldozer.
The tank
soldier hollered something at me,
and the bulldozer began driving in such a way as to
prevent me from
seeing the side of the bulldozer
that displayed the serial number, or the side windows
from which one
might see the drivers. Despite
their clever maneuvering, I managed to get several
pictures of the
serial number, but the tinted
windows on the machine did not allow me to get a decent
photo of the
driver. By the time I'd finished,
the paramedics were carrying Rachel on a stretcher to the
ambulance.
She was still breathing at
this point, and her eyes were open, but she was clearly
in a great
deal of pain. Four activists piled
into the ambulance with Rachel and the paramedics and
were rushed to
Al Negar Hospital. She was
brought directly to the emergency room, and was in there
when I
arrived in a taxi.
17:20
She was pronounced dead and was wheeled out of the
emergency room
with a white sheet covering
her head.
"It's over." Said Mohamed with tears in his
eyes. He was a close
Palestinian friend of hers and mine,
and a trusted member of our group. I couldn't believe it.
It was so
unreal. There was a part of me that
couldn't accept that she was gone. It had all happened so
fast, I
was in complete shock. I became less
emotional than I'd been since the incident. I was just
dumbfounded.
As others began to cry, I joined in,
and was on international television being comforted by
the before-
mentioned Mohamed. But I have yet
to even come close to expressing the emotion that is
built up inside
me.
I'm still having trouble accepting that it's real. I keep
remembering small things about her, like that she
liked juice, and used to wear this ridiculous pink jump
suit that
was given to her by a Palestinian woman.
I've started smoking cigarettes since her death, and I'm
constantly
telling the story of how Rachel had
quit smoking for a year before coming to Rafah, but
started again
the night she arrived, while she stayed
in a tent along the boarder that came under heavy tank
fire. One of
the bullets being fired around the tent
in attempts to frighten them actually hit the top of the
tent. She's
smoked ever since, and how I wish that
she'd lived long enough to die of lung cancer. Perhaps
now I will.
Few activists actually come to Palestine planning to come
to Rafah.
In fact, many have to be talked into
it, as the West Bank has gotten so much more publicity.
But Rachel
had heard about Rafah from a good
friend of hers who'd spent time here a few months ago,
and he told
her about how neglected Rafah is by
the world, and by the activist community. She was also
aware of how
dangerous Rafah is. In fact, more
people have been killed per-capita in Rafah than any
other place in
Palestine. So not only is it the most
dangerous place, but it is also considered the poorest
city in all
of Palestine, a country considered one
of the poorest in the world. Rafah is one of the poorest
and most
dangerous places in the world, and
Rachel made a B-line straight for it.
19 March 2003 Dorothy - . . . here is an e-mail
received today from a
16-year-old boy, Tamer, in Dheisha camp (Bethlehem).
He's struggling to get his message into English and
out. tamer's email address: "red full stop
alhj"
<bbf_im@hotmail.com>.
He would like to hear from you -
greg
hi dear all
how are you from palestine i am sending this massage and
i
hope from it to get for the palestinian children the
usfuly thing's :
'i am writing this massege and i am so sad and angry
becouse i am know what is the war with iraq will be do
in all the world and i like tell you we are in
palestine we had war in the last time so we are used
to this war becouse the tanks and the helekopter and
all the arms it is in our life we are see it in the
games and in the fact we are see it in our dreams and
in our days and in every where so i hope from all to
understand me becouse i was tried the war and i know
the bad effect of it so i dont like from another
peoplation to try it and i think thats enough one
peoplation was tried it and it was the palestinian
peoplation so i am so sad to say thats i am trying to
mke the love and the peace but thats hat i can to do
but i ws hoped to live in ready safe life thats ht i
hope and what alll the people hope thats they are hope
to live in plaece area so thats what i want to say and
i like tell you i am nat fried from our war in
palestine but i am so fried from iraq war becouse it
will be get it effect on all the world o please keep
the world from the war that what we hope so i hope to
see from every one the answer as soon as becouse i
think this case nat just for me it is for every one
who have pronoun in the big world so i hope from you
to help the jastice to live and to kill the injustice
together thats wht i need to tell you so good luck and
this massege for alll my friend and who i know ok bye
and here from you sooooooooon
bye'
Please Can you do any of the following
1. Sign the new petition with your brief comment - at
http://www.ipetitions.com/campaigns/StopWorldWar3/
We the undersigned
- call on the European powers, especially the governments
of France,
Germany and the Russian Federation, with the government
of Iraq, to provide
for their contingent of peacekeeping troops to arrive in
Iraq within hours,
take steps to secure its borders and airspace against
attack, and provide
protection for the U.N. inspectors there to continue to
carry out their duty.
- call on the aforementioned powers and all members of
the U.N., to take
the earliest opportunity to ratify this peacekeeping
action in the U.N.
General Assembly, under the auspices of UN Resolution
377, Uniting for
Peace, designed conceived to prevent aggression by any
permanent member of
the Security Council: precisely the crisis now facing the
world community,
- call on the United Nations membership to implement the
provisions of UN
Resolution 1325, Women, Peace, and Security; to engage
womankind in the
process to pacify warring mankind, and to protect women
and children, the
victims who are hit hardest by the scourge of war,
- call once more on the US-UK governments to observe the
principles of UN
Resolution 290:
"To settle international disputes by peaceful means
and to co- operate in
supporting United Nations efforts to resolve outstanding
problems."
- call the US-UK leaders to mind of the consequences, for
themselves and
for their countrymen, both civilian and military, of
defying the decisions
of the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal, which found for the
death penalty
against the Nazi leaders with this verdict:
"To initiate a war of aggression is the supreme
international crime,
differing only from other war crimes in that it contains
within itself the
accumulated evil of the whole."
2. Please reply if you have citizen mailing lists to
offer, or further
useful addresses of heads of state lists. See kit for
list.
We are bombarding world leaders with individual emails
via an e-mail
blaster kit,
www.unitingforpeace.com
(www.waronfreedom.org/uniting4peacekit.htm
).
from John Leonard, togethernet.
comments to petition, address lists gladly accepted -
please forward url
http://www.ipetitions.com/campaigns/StopWorldWar3/
to all your networks!
SETTLERS GET SUBSIDISED
ON THE GOLAN HEIGHTS
On the Golan Heights, Syrian land, 30 or so Jewish
settlers receive large subsidies.These are from the
Ministry of Agriculture which supports Jewish farmers,
but in this case exorbitant in contrast to farmers
elsewhere. A settler on Golan receives a HOUSING subsidy
thus of 850$, whereas such farming subsidies to other
Israeli inhabitants are in the region of 250$. These
Golan Heights settlers are reputed to have received
60.000.000$ over the past year; presumably this
represents a tranch of subsidies of various supplements
Settlers offer West Bank
'terror tours'
The BBC has interviewed an American Israeli entrepreneur
who has planned "TERROR TOURS" in the West Bank
and Gaza that aim to attract tourist thrill-seekers to
Israel.This outrageous and criminal enterprise offers
such excitements as flights in helicopters and the firing
of machine guns, described as "training people in
how to deal with a terrorist situation"The American
"Jake Greenwald" was inspired by the mass panic
he witnessed during the WTC Towers tragedy and has a
desire to find among these thrill seekers a method for
them to dominate fear. " Israel, has great
expertise in dealing with terror," he maintained
HIS
ITINERARY :
Weapons
training ;
Tracking 'terrorists' in desert; Aerial tour of
'terrorist enclaves';
Experience of F-16 bombers and tanks;
Paintball attack on 'Arab village'.
The price is
5,500$
He maintains that this effort to rescue the ailing
tourist business in Israel is attracting people from the
legal,medical and academic professions.
These tourists will be given simulated practices that are
part and parcel of the military regime at present in West
Bank and Gaza..........
Daily activities begin with what Mr Greenwald called
"light exercises" in hand-to-hand combat.
Tourists will also be taught how to
fire a range of weapons, including M16s, Uzis, pistols
and Kalashnikov machine guns, and learn how to operate a
tank.
There will be talks by Israelis who
took part in Israel's military offensive in Jenin last
April, and lessons in how to track "terrorists"
across the desert.
Participants will be taken on a
helicopter tour of Palestinian "terrorist
enclaves" and be shown arms and suicide bomber belts
seized by the Israeli army.
The highlight of the trip involves a
paintball fight in a simulated Arab village, where
participants will be able to go from room-to-room
"cleaning out Arab terrorists", said Mr
Greenwald.
IF WE GO TO WAR......
An idea of how much we will
hear about Iraqi casualties was given by the BBC and ITN
last week. Both highlighted the suicide bombing that
killed 15 Israelis on a bus in Haifa. When Israeli armed
forces then killed 11 Palestinians in Gaza it was
described as "retaliation" for Haifa. There was
no mention that the day before Haifa, 8 Palestinians,
including a pregnant woman, had been killed, with muted
coverage in the media. More importantly, there was no
mention that Haifa had been the first suicide attack
since January 5, and that not one Israeli civilian had
been killed within Israel since January 12. In the same
period, Israel had killed over 154 Palestinians. There
was also no mention that some 75% of Palestinians now
live below the poverty line and over 30% of children
under five suffer fromchronic malnutrition.
Visit the Media Lens website: http://www.medialens.org
From the International solidarity
movement
1) Love and Resistance from Yanoun
March 9, 2003
Emily Winkelstein
Yanoun, Nablus
hello everyone,
hope this message finds you all well...i'm sorry it
has been such a long time since my last report. i
am spending just about all of my time in the village now
and get to email very infrequently. i would like to
urge anyone who is considering traveling to Palestine,
first, to do it - the presence of internationals here is
really important and the support and validation that it
provides to the Palestinians - a people who the world
consistently ignores - certainly seems to be valued and
valuable. Also, i would urge people to consider
spending a significant amount of time in one place.
Getting to know people on a more intimate and personal
level has been an incredible experience for me. i
am gaining all sorts of insights about the depth and
reach of the israeli occupation and while
i want to avoid making this a report about
me and my journey (that is for another email), i
will say that this is an intensely
personal, emotional and challenging venture as well.
Of course, to see trees and homes bulldozed and
land cleared for the building of an immense
wall that will cripple an already devastated
Palestinian economy is jarring and awful and upsetting
and deserves the attention of all of the world.
to see settlements that are lavish and soo
comfortable built with the resources of
others on the land of others and consistently
infringing on the lives of the Palestinians, just
next to the remains of homes that have been demolished -
remains littered with toys and chairs and clothes and
photos and the belongings of its former inhabitants
- next to shops that are closed or streets
that can hardly be called that because they are made
more of potholes and rubble than anything or schools
that have no heat and little protection from the elements
and villages that have light and electricity for
only 4 hours a day because they either can not
afford a stronger infrastructure (because they are
no longer able to travel to work because of checkpoints
or social control by the israeli occupation forces
or they are forced to work for the settlers that took
their land for the equivalent of maybe $10 dollars a
day for manual labor) - of course - to witness
this it is shocking and unfathomable and how could this
be allowed by the world community? and of
course, how could this be funded by governments - by
the United States, by the Israeli government (by way of,
again the US government), by governments that take such
pride in their 'compassion' for 'freedom' and
so-called 'democracy'. These are important
questions that come to mind every day here - and to
witness these scenes is dramatic and again, deserve
the attention of the world community and must be exposed.
Another experience, however, is to sit by a fire at
the end of a long day and talk to a father about how he
feels like a failure to his children because he has to
struggle to provide food and clothes and still can't keep
his children safe when armed settlers come into his home
when he is out minding his sheep and ransack his
home and frighten and harass his wife and his children
- of course with no recourse - except to maybe leave
his village - with no where to go - to see more of
his land confiscated. to hear about how the
joys of everyday life have been stripped from him, how
living to him has become only about waking, working,
eating and sleeping - to just get by and provide for his
family, unable to enjoy things like the snow or the
changing of the seasons, which once used to provide
enjoyment and now just offer added stress.
because the settlers have confiscated his land or they
have threatened his safety if he goes a certain distance
on HIS property, he must know pay almost three times what
he used to feed his sheep that provide milk and other
resources for him and his family. at the same time,
his profits have been cut by nearly three quarters, again
because of the confiscation of olive trees and land that
he was once able to harvest. to hear this from a
friend who has opened his home to you and offered
every kindness in the world, after having shared
laughter, fear and quiet is an experience that i can
not explain in any words - and of course my experience is
nothing in comparison to his in actually living it.
and this is one conversation.
The other morning, after her son had left for
nablus to attend university, i sat with a woman who has
become like a mother to me, she cried quietly, listening
to the news about 5 killed in gaza and the impending war
and the fear that her son could be stopped by soldiers as
he traveled through the mountains to try to reach his
university - or that he would get caught there under
curfew with no access to food or a way to get back
to his home in Yanun. or maybe, she feared an event
like last year when a tank fired on his home in
nablus as he and his brother were studying, leaving
him with shards of metal still in his hand from the
blast. later that day, when we heard that the
presence of soldiers in Nablus had decreased, again there
was fear, that this was not a good thing, but rather a
sign that the IOF was clearing their people out to hit by
the air or because of the war on Iraq and the potential
demolition of communities in mass. this is the same
woman who was able to see her daughter for the first time
in two years last week after i traveled with her to come
to yanun from deheishe refugee camp near bethlehem.
this trip usually takes me about an hour, maybe an hour
and a half because of the checkpoints or we have to
wait for the services to fill up or we are stopped a few
times by the army for id checks ( of course, this could
make the journey much longer at any time) - but on the
day that i traveled with my new friend and her 5 month
old son who her family had yet to meet because she is not
allowed to make this journey by the IOF - it took us
about 5 hours. all of this in the pouring rain -
again, with a 5 month old carried in this woman's
arms. the five hours was spent going from one car
to another, avoiding checkpoints and army and roads that
had been flooded and could not be traveled in the
rain...in one instance, when we walked
about 10 meters too far near a checkpoint, we
had to then take another car through hills of mud to get
back to the same point just 10 meters from where we
started. all of this, again, so that she could see
her family and so that they could meet her son. it
would be much too dangerous for her husband to make the
journey with her and he also could not stop working
during this time.
When I visit the school, or ask children to make
drawings for me - it is almost always some version of the
same picture - Palestinians pleading for their land as
settlers and army fire weapons at or beat them - pictures
of their fathers and mothers and brothers and sisters
getting assaulted - bleeding - screaming for their land
and for peace and their lives - and the sun still has a
smile on it's face. this is real. this is
what these children experience daily. in america,
we dance around issues all of the time - especially with
children. we paint the picture we want to see out
of fear that we might shatter some mythic vision of a
happy day to day where everything is flowers and
sunshine. well, here, a 9 year old child can more
succinctly sum up the situation facing Iraq than probably
many people in the US and could certainly give a more
realistic image of what the Palestinian people face than
most of the world is willing to open their eyes
too. this is tragic and so unjust and so unfair -
these children deserve to live in the peace they so
want to know -
There are many many more stories like this. I
will continue to write them so that they can be
heard. I will continue to talk and to
learn. I appreciate so much this experience and
these people - and of course I say that with a deep anger
and confusion that I have come to meet them under these
circumstances...that I am able to 'appreciate' this
experience - I don't know - it is hard to
communicate...as much as I love the people of yanun - I
wish, with all that I am, that these experiences did not
exist to be shared.
Sending love to everyone - take good care of
yourselves and lets hope that next week the world is able
to stop Bush from pursuing the war he wants so
badly.
In solidarity and resistance from Yanun -
xoxo emily
Speech given by President Fidel Castro at the 13th
Conference of heads of State and government of the
Non-Aligned Movement in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia on
February 25, 2003,
"Year of
the Glorious Anniversary of Martí and Moncada."
Most excellent and esteemed friend Mahathir bin Mohamad,
Prime Minister of Malaysia; Esteemed Leaders and other
delegation members;Distinguished guests:
We live in difficult times. In
recent months we have heard chilling words and opinions
more than once.
In a speech given to the West Point cadets on June 1,
2002, the president of the United States declared:
"Our security will require transforming the
military. You will lead a military that must be ready to
strike at a moment¹s notice in any dark corner of the
world."That same day he proclaimed the doctrine of a
pre-emptive and surprise war, something that nobody had
ever done in the political history of the world.
Months later, when referring to an unnecessary and almost
certain military action against Iraq, he affirmed that if
they were forced to fight then they would fight with the
full might of their armed forces. That was not stated by
the government of a small and weak state; it was the head
of the richest and most powerful military potency that
has ever existed, in possession of thousands of nuclear
weapons, enough to eliminate the people of the world
various times over and of other terrible military methods
of conventional and mass destruction.
That is what we are: "Dark corners of the
world." That is how some see Third World countries.
Nobody has defined us better, nor done so with more
disdain. As former colonies of powers that divided and
plundered the world for centuries, today we constitute
the group of developing countries. Not one has full
independence, fair and equal treatment, or any national
security; not one is a member of the Security Council, or
has the right of veto or can make a decision in the
international financial organizations; or retain its best
talents, protect itself from the flight of its capital,
the destruction of nature and environment caused by
economically developed countries¹ spendthrift, selfish
and insatiable consumerism.
After the last world butchery of the 1940's, we were
promised a peaceful world, a reduced gap between rich and
poor and that the most developed would help the least
developed. It was all an enormous lie. They imposed an
unsustainable and unbearable world order on us. The world
is being led up a one-way street.
In just 150 years we have exhausted the gasoline and oil
that it took the planet 300 million years to accumulate.
In only 100 years, humanity has grown by approximately
1.5 billion people, and now stands at more than 6 billion
inhabitants. It has to depend entirely on energy sources
that are still being researched and developed. Poverty is
increasing; old and new diseases are threatening to wipe
out entire nations; soil is eroding and losing its
fertility; the climate is changing, the air, drinking
water and the seas are increasingly more contaminated. If
we wrest authority from them, then the United Nations is
hindered and destroyed; aid for developing countries is
diminished; a $2.5 trillion USD debt is demanded from the
Third World, an amount absolutely impossible to pay under
current conditions; instead, every year a trillion
dollars is spent on increasingly more sophisticated and
lethal weapons. And for what?
A similar sum is used for advertising, sowing consumerist
desires impossible to satisfy in millions and millions of
people. Why and for what?
For the first time, our species is running the real risk
of exterminating itself due to the madness of human being
themselves, victims of the same "civilization."
However, nobody will fight for us who make up the vast
majority. Only we ourselves, with the support of millions
of manual workers and intellectuals from developed
countries who see the same catastrophe also affecting
their own peoples, sowing ideas, creating awareness,
mobilizing the public opinion of the world and
the U.S. people, will be able to save the species. Nobody
needs anyone to tell them this. You know it only too
well. Our most sacred task is to fight and fight we will!
Thank you very much.
international
Women's day
Addameer , The
Prisoners Support and Human Rights Association
8 March 2003 - Press Release/ International Women's Day
Addameer Prisoners Support and Human Rights Association
welcomes the release of Mrs. 'Abla Sa'adat, arrested on
her way to the World Social Forum on 21 January 2003 and
subsequently given a 4 month administrative detention
order. She was released on the morning of 7th March
2003 and, just as her arrest, was not given a reason for
her early release. However, as we also commemorate
International Women's Day today, we also remember the
remaining 65 Palestinian female detainees currently being
held by Israel in the Neveh Terzah section of Ramleh
Prison.
Of the 65 Palestinian women being detained, 10 are
Palestinian minors under the age of 18, held in
conditions that contravene international standards of
detention and contrary to the Convention on the Rights of
the Child, which stipulates that all individuals under
the age of 18 are considered children, must not be
submitted to forms of torture or cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment, nor should they be deprived of their
liberty except as a last resort. The youngest of
the detainees, Zainab Al Shouly and 'Aisha Abeyat, both
turned 15 whilst in prison.
6 Palestinian women are currently being held under
administrative detention orders, imprisoned without
charge or trial. One woman, Tahani Al Titi, has
been serving continuously renewed administrative
detention orders since 13 June 2002. The use of
administrative detention for Palestinian women has
dramatically increased in the past two months,
paralleling similar use during the first Palestinian
Intifada. An apparent pattern has developed in
which Palestinian women are now being detained in order
to place pressure on relations who may be wanted' by
Israel, or under interrogation. This was evident in
the case of 'Abla Sa'adaat, wife of PFLP General
Secretary Ahmad Sa'aadat
Detainees also include mothers of young children,
including Mervat Taha, who was arrested on 13 June 2002
while she was pregnant. She recently gave birth to
her child whilst in prison and serving a 20 month
sentence.
The conditions of detention in which Palestinian women
are held are inhumane.. Female detainees are
subjected to individual and collective punishment,
including the prevention of family visits, being placed
in solitary confinement for varying periods of time, and
banning canteen privileges, meaning that women are not
able to obtain supplementary food or hygiene
supplies. Surprise searches are conducted regularly
of the women's cells, and personal belongings are often
confiscated or destroyed. Hot water and
electricity to the cells are often cut off as a form of
punishment.
Food provided to the detainees is not adequate in terms
of quantity and quality and does not meet basic
nutritional requirements. This has caused and will
cause vitamin deficient diseases and other health
problems amongst detainees in the long term.The current
health situation of female detainees is of grave concern.
There is clear neglect towards Palestinian detainees in
the provision of health services, and a clear
discrimination in the form of services offered between
Palestinian detainees and Israeli Jewish detainees held
in the same facility. There are often delays in
medical treatment when needed, and those in need of
hospital care are often not taken to hospital or are
offered pain killers for any illness. As a result of the
fact that family visits have been prevented for over a
year, female detainees do not have enough clothing or
supplies that are normally provided by families.
For over a year, permits for families of female
detainees to travel from the West Bank to Ramleh Prison
in Israel, where Palestinian female detainees are held in
contravention of the Fourth Geneva Convention, have not
been issued. Residents of Jerusalem who carry different
ID cards than West Bank residents and are normally able
to travel and allowed visits, are often denied family
visits as a form of punishment.
Any attempt from female detainees to protest their
conditions of detention is met by collective
punishment. For example, in July 2002 female
detainees began a hunger strike in protest of these
conditions. In response, the Prisons Authorities
threw tear gas anisters into the women's small cells,
causing numerous injuries amongst the detainees.
Lawyers attempting to visit the detainees are often met
with harassment from the Prisons Authorities. They
are forced to wait for long periods of time before the
detainee is brought to them, sometimes up to four
hours. The delay means that lawyers are often not
able to see all the detainees requested, as lawyer visits
are set for a limited period of time. On 4 February
2003, Addameer's lawyer Adv. Mahmoud Hassan was locked in
the prison's family visit center at Neveh Terzah for 3
hours before his client was brought to see him, with no
reason given for the delay or
for his being detained.
These are but some examples of the situation of
Palestinian female detainees currently being held in
Israeli prisons. 'Abla Sa'aadat's early release is
a welcome development, and offers hope in the face of
Israel's policy of arbitrary arrest and detention.
Pressure, in the form of letter writing, awareness
activities, lobbying local representatives and other
activities, does work. At a time when the world is
on the brink of war, allegedly for the sake of human
rights and democracy, Addameer thanks all those who have
worked diligently towards ensuring basic human rights in
the only way these rights can be secured: through
grassroots pressure and public awareness. Change can only
come from people and not through war. On
International Women's Day, Addameer stands in solidarity
with alestinian female detainees who remain firm in the
face of oppression, and asks the international community
for its continued support of these women.
My Draft Resistance
Danya Vaknin
Danya Vaknin, 19, is from Mevaseret Zion. She is
currently doing national service at a school in Tel-Aviv.
She is active with New Profile and with the Seniors
Letter group (Shministim). This is her fourth year as a
volunteer at the Magen David Adom ambulance service.
I cant remember exactly when I decided I
wasnt prepared to take an active role in the army.
I remember I started talking about it, I decided to open
up questions that I was afraid to ask, hard questions
that the society I lived in always |