THE HANDSTAND

JANUARY2007


news from palestine


 

Dear friends,

 

As far as I can tell (in the limited time I can spend on the search), the (Hebrew) review below, by Itzhal Laor, of Dalia Karpel's new documentary "The Diaries of Yossef Nachmani" has so far been printed only in the Hebrew version of "Haaretz" (and reprinted in Occupation Magazine). The same, I believe, same goes for today's (Hebrew) review, by Uri Klein, of yesterday night's (Jan 14) airing of the film on Israeli Channel 1 (http://www.haaretz.co.il/hasite/spages/813557.html). In the absence, so far, of any English reviews, I've included below the public relations description of the film, published by the Jewish Film Festival (ongoing now in NY City; Jan. 11-26).

 

I cannot stress enough the importance I attach to this film. Its well-researched, carefully supported narrative makes a huge contribution towards dismantling the popular historical view that so many of us have been taught to accept. Through the key case of Tiberias and the process put in motion in the Galilee over the decade leading up to the founding of Israel, the film allows a clear understanding of the mode of thinking-emotion-action that drove, and still drives with full force, the Jewish takeover of Palestinian land by varied interconnected means. No less important, it demonstrates how that mode of operation could all the while be presented and perceived as benign and peace-seeking—an enduring image that has worked so well to facilitate (both in past and today) the blindered, active complicity of so many of us in the systematic dispossession of the Palestinian people, ongoing now for almost a century.

 

Rela.................................

http://filmlinc.com/wrt/programs/nyjff06.htm

 

The Diaries of Yossef Nachmani NY Premiere
Dalia Karpel, Israel, 2005, 60m; video. Hebrew with Arabic and English subtitles

This documentary explores the life and work of a Jewish National Fund administrator who was responsible for Jewish settlements in the Galilee in the 30s and 40s. Nachmani left behind fascinating diaries that shed light upon the authorís complex and contradictory personality and examine critical years of Zionism and the beginning of the Jewish-Arab conflict from the unique perspective of a man who displayed determination and persistence on one hand, and fear and doubt on the other. The film will be followed by a panel discussion with Dalia Karpel, Director of The Diaries of Yosef Nachmani, and Uri S. Cohen, Assistant Professor of Hebrew Literature, Department of Middle East and Asian Languages and Cultures, Columbia University, and moderated by Richard Pena, Program Director, Film Society of Lincoln Center, and Associate Professor, School of the Arts, Film Division, Columbia University.

 

 

http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=18582

 


Campaign for Right to Entry Press Conference

January 14th, 2007 | Posted in Press Releases, Denial of entry

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

by the Campaign for the Right to Entry,

The Campaign for Right to Entry/Re-entry will be holding a press conference on the new developments in Israel’s denial of entry policy

The Campaign for Right of Entry/Re-entry will provide the notice recently issued by the Israeli Authorities that changes Israel’s policy of denying entry to foreign nationals traveling into the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt). The notice outlines new procedures regarding access to the West Bank for foreign nationals.

The Campaign regards this as a rare moment where the Israeli Authorities acknowledge in writing the severe humanitarian crisis brought on by Israeli policies of denying foreign nationals the right to family reunification and entry to the oPt. Yet the crisis directly affecting over 45,000 foreign nationals remains unresolved.

The Campaign will present an analysis of the recent developments .
First hand stories from foreign nationals denied entry and renewal since the new policies were announced will be heard - private interviews will be available upon request.
The Jerusalem Center for Legal Aid will present a legal analysis of the new document and policies.

Location: Palestinian Media Center (PMC), Ramallah
Al-Quds-Nablus St. , AL -Abraj Al-Watanieh Bldg.,3rd fl. Al Bireh 02-2407721-5
Time: Tuesday, January 16th at 11:00 AM
Transportation will be available to the Press Conference in Ramallah from the American Colony Hotel in East Jerusalem at 10:15 AM. Please call Subha on 0599-644868 to reserve a seat on the bus.
Translation from Arabic to English and Hebrew will be available on site.


Israeli Occupation Government Builds a  New Synagogue Near Al-Aqsa Mosque, Inside the Palestinian Area

New synagogue near Al-Aqsa Mosque

PNN, (Jerusalem) Palestine News Network Thursday, 11 January 2007
www.aljazeerah.info

Residents of occupied East Jerusalem's Old City are requesting international assistance as Israeli occupation forces move forward with plans to build a Jewish Synagogue in the heart of the Palestinian area. The exact location is just 50 meters from the Al-Aqsa Mosque, which is itself already under threat.

In a field visit by the Al-Aqsa Media Foundation, Walid Al-Zerba and Ismail Al-Duwaik, the potential damage was recorded. The construction is adjacent to Al-Zerba's home.

He said, “A month ago they began bringing in the equipment and staring the work on an area of 200 meters squared taken for the Jews after the Israeli occupation of Jerusalem began in 1967. The first step was a synagogue and at the same time they started work on another structure on a plot of land belonging to the Department of Islamic Endowments covering an area of 70 meters squared.”

Al-Zerba told PNN, “This matter summoned our intervention and we demanded of the workers to know who was responsible for the work they were doing, but they said that they were merely do cleaning and maintenance around the Muslim site and that they were not attempting to steal the plot of earth.”

He continued, “But these statements were not correct. Vehicles and armed soldiers began pouring into the area and a few days ago began construction that made it clear it is a synagogue. The door is on the south side, also making it clear that the next target is the adjacent Islamic Endowments' plot of land.”

The Israeli land-grab for Jerusalem and the illegal annexation has been ongoing for years. The concern is how many of these “changes” will be reversible if international law is ever upheld in the city.

United Nations Resolution 35 is just one of many that addresses the issue of the Israeli colonization of Jerusalem. “The 'Basic Law' on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel are null and void and must be rescinded.”


***Military prison commander, First Sgt. Maj. suspended over misconduct.
by Amos Harel
Haaretz Correspondent

The commander of military prison number six, a military detention base in northern Israel, and a unit first sergeant major were suspended on Thursday following a surprise inspection of the prison base.After fielding numerous complaints from soldiers, head of the Israel Defense Forces human resources department, Major General Elazar Stern, launched a surprise inspection which focused on the treatment of individuals at the base.

The inspection revealed severe failures in the management of the base as well as failures in the way in which senior officers treated their subordinates. The commander of the base and the first sergeant major were discovered to act offensively and inappropriately towards their subordinates, as well as instilling disproportionate fear among all the unit's soldiers.

The two men accused of misconduct were summoned for questioning by the head of the military police, Brigadier General Ron Benny, who decided to suspend them for two weeks. In addition, Benny ordered an inquiry into the conduct of the military prison base.

Military sources said in response to the findings that the behavior revealed in this incident has no room in the IDF and should be condemned.

***Indeed there is Apartheid in Israel

By Shulamit Aloni
Hebrew original:
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3346283,00.html
 Yediot Acharonot, Israel's largest circulating newspaper

A new order issued by the GOC Central command bans the conveyance of Palestinians in Israeli vehicles. Such a blatant violation of the right to travel joins the long list of humans rights violations carried out by Israel in the [Occupied] Territories.



Jewish self-righteousness is taken for granted among ourselves to such an extent that we fail to see what's right in front of our eyes. It's simply inconceivable that the ultimate victims, the Jews, can carry out evil deeds. Nevertheless, the state of Israel practises its own, quite violent, form of Apartheid with the native Palestinian population.

The US Jewish Establishment's onslaught on former President Jimmy Carter is based on him daring to tell the truth which is known to all: through its army, the government of Israel practises a brutal form of Apartheid in the territory it occupies. Its army has turned every Palestinian village and town into a fenced-in, or blocked-in, detention camp. All this is done in order to keep an eye on the
population's movements and to make its life difficult. Israel even imposes a total curfew whenever
the settlers, who have illegally usurped the Palestinians' land, celebrate their holidays or conduct their parades.

If that were not enough, the generals commanding the region frequently issue further orders, regulations, instructions and rules (let us not forget: they are the lords of the land). By now they
have requisitioned further lands for the purpose of constructing "Jewish only" roads. Wonderful roads, wide roads, well-paved roads, brightly lit at night - all that on stolen land. When a Palestinian drives on such a road, his vehicle is confiscated and he is sent on his way.

On one occasion I witnessed such an encounter between a driver and a soldier who was taking down the details before confiscating the vehicle and sending its owner away. "Why?" I asked the
soldier. "It's an order - this is a Jews-only road", he replied. I inquired as to where was the
sign indicating this fact and instructing [other] drivers not to use it. His answer was nothing short of amazing. "It is his responsibility to know it, and besides, what do you want us to do, put up a sign here and let some antisemitic reporter or journalist take a photo so he that can show the world that Apartheid exists here?" 

Indeed Apartheid does exist here. And our army is not "the most moral army in the world" as we are told by its commanders. Sufficient to mention that every town and every village has turned
into a detention centre and that every entry and every exit has been closed, cutting it off from arterial traffic. If it were not enough that Palestinians are not allowed to travel on the roads paved 'for Jews only', on their land, the current GOC found it necessary to land an additional blow on the natives in their own land with an "ingenious proposal".

Humanitarian activists cannot transport Palestinians either

Major-General Naveh, renowned for his superior patriotism, has issued a new order. Coming into affect on 19 January, it prohibits the conveyance of Palestinians without a permit. The order determines that Israelis are not allowed to transport Palestinians in an Israeli vehicle (one registered in Israel regardless of what kind of numberplate it carries) unless they have received explicit permission to do so. The permit relates to both the driver and the Palestinian passenger. Of course none of this applies to those whose labour serves the settlers. They and their employers will naturally receive the required permits so they can continue to serve the lords of the land, the settlers.


Did man of peace President Carter truly err in concluding that Israel is creating Apartheid? Did he exaggerate? Don't the US Jewish community leaders recognise the International Convention on the
Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination of 7 March 1966, to which Israel is a signatory? Are the US Jews who launched the loud and abusive campaign against Carter for supposedly maligning Israel's character and its democratic and humanist nature unfamiliar with the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid of 30 November 1973? Apartheid is defined therein as an international crime that among other things includes using different legal instruments to rule over different racial groups, thus depriving people of their human rights. Isn't freedom of travel one of these rights?

In the past, the US Jewish community leaders were quite familiar with the meaning of those conventions. For some reason, however, they are convinced that Israel is allowed to contravene them. It's OK to kill civilians, women and children, old people and parents with their children, deliberately or otherwise without accepting any responsibility. It's permissible to rob people of their lands, destroy their crops, and cage them up like animals in the zoo. From now on, Israelis and International humanitarian organisations' volunteers are prohibited from assisting a woman in labour by taking her to the hospital. [Israeli human rights group] Yesh Din volunteers cannot take a robbed and beaten-up Palestinian to the police station to lodge a complaint. (Police stations are located at the heart of the settlements.) Is there anyone who believes that this is not Apartheid?

Jimmy Carter does not need me to defend his reputation that has been sullied by Israelophile community officials. The trouble is that their love of Israel distorts their judgment and blinds them
from seeing what's in front of them. Israel is an occupying power that for 40 years has been oppressing an indigenous people, which is entitled to a sovereign and independent existence while living in peace with us. We should remember that we too used very violent terror against foreign rule because we wanted our own state. And the list of victims of terror is quite long and extensive.

We do limit ourselves to denying the [Palestinian] people human rights. We not only rob of them of their freedom, land and water. We apply collective punishment to millions of people and even, in revenge-driven frenzy, destroy the electricity supply for one and half million civilians. Let them "sit in the darkness" and "starve".

Employees cannot be paid their wages because Israel is holding 500 million shekels that belong to the Palestinians.  And after all that we remain "pure as the driven snow". There are no moral
blemishes on our actions. There is no racial separation. There is no Apartheid. It's an invention of the enemies of Israel. Hooray for our brothers and sisters in the US! Your devotion is very much appreciated. You have truly removed a nasty stain from us. Now there can be an extra spring in our step as we confidently abuse the Palestinian population, using the "most moral army in the world".

[Translated by Sol Salbe]from Mohammed Omer, www.rafahtoday.org


***Dahamesh Village near Ramla in imminent danger of destruction
By Nori Al-Okbi,
Beduin Rights Defence Association
6/1/2007
(Email sending-TOI-Billboard, January 6, 2007)



The village of Dahamesh near Ramla is in imminent danger of destruction. The village has close to a thousand inhabitants, who are denied all municipal services. Their houses were given demolition notices, and the entire village is in imminent danger of being demolished and completely erased. Five families living crowded in a single house, among the many who received such demolition orders, have be3en informed that their house is “next in line” when destroyers next arrive in the village. The village is located at the Lod Valley Area, on a piece of privately-owned land 160 dunums (about 40 acres) in size, It had been founded in 1932, with the encouragement of the then mayor of Ramlah.

The Present Mayor of Ramla, Yoel Lavi, notorious for various racist anti-Arab statements, has declared that “The solution” for this village is “Two D-9 bulldozers, accompanied by two companies of Border Guards” (Riot Police). Once these become available, “The bulldozers will move freely, from one side of the village to another”.
No one in authority has reprimanded the mayor for his words. We call upon the Prime Minister and the Ministers of Justice and of the Interior to end the cruel policy of demolitions against the Arab citizens of Israel.
We call upon all civic organizations in and outside Israel to intervene with the authorities and demand an end to this brutal policy.
A protest tent was erected at Dahamesh Village. All visitors, press reporters, observers and solidarity delegations are most welcome.

Contact:
Arafat Ismail, Head of the Dahamesh Village local Association 052-3202055
Nori Al-Okbi, Head of The Beduin Rights Defence Association 054-54605565


Campaign for the Right of Entry

Announcements of Israeli Change of Policy Unfounded in Reality

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
by the
http://www.righttoenter.ps/

Despite assurances relayed by American and European diplomats, foreign passport holders trying to join their families in the Israeli occupied Palestinian territory (oPt), including Bethlehem, for the holidays are being denied entry and expelled by Israel.

On Friday the 15th edition of the English newspaper, Palestine Times, reported that a senior American diplomat announced that Israel had annulled a previous decision banning entry to foreign passport holders who have family residing in the Palestinian areas and was resuming its earlier practice of issuing three month renewable visas that would allow them to visit and live together with their families. Attempts to understand from US officials more details surrounding this announcement
have been unsuccessful, to date.

In stark contrast to that announcement, at least three foreign nationals attempting to join their families in the Israeli occupied Palestinian territory were expelled last week.

1)Kamal, an eighteen-year old US college student who had come to visit his grandfather and family in Ramallah over the holidays was denied entry at Ben Gurion airport on Saturday December 16th.

2)Another Palestinian American from Cleveland, Ohio, Linda Ali Mahmmud, who is deaf and dumb like her brother Shukri, had traveled in the hopes of spending the holidays with her cancer stricken aunt but was denied entry at Ben Gurion airport on Thursday December 14th, allegedly because Shukri had overstayed his permit. Shukri had requested a routine permit renewal in October, however, the Israeli Ministry of Interior liaison at the Israeli Civil Administration suddenly stopped processing renewals for foreigners married to Palestinian ID-holders and refuses to accept Shukris application.

3)Abdullah, a German national, who works for the International Peace & Cooperation Center in Jerusalem, had hopes of reuniting with his wife, who carries a Palestinian ID and their newborn child following statements made last week by European diplomats regarding Israels policy change. He was denied entry for the fourth time at the Allenby Bridge on Wednesday the 20th of December.

Arbitrary denials of entry and expulsions have not stopped. No transparent rules or mechanisms are in place so far. Palestinian families, vital service providers and businesses remain vulnerable to
arbitrary denial of entry and residency. This is especially hard to accept at a time of major Christian and Muslim traditional festivities when families want to be together more then ever, said Anita Abdullah speaking for the Campaign for the Right of Entry to the oPt .

The U.S. government estimates that there are about 35,000 Palestinian Americans living in the West Bank at any one time, and an additional 10,000 Palestinians with other foreign passports. All these people and their families remain separated or at risk, and Palestinian educational and social service institutions, humanitarian agencies and businesses remain vulnerable to the loss of critical personnel, until applications for entry and residency in the oPt are decided in accordance with a clear, transparent and internationally lawful policy.

Contact: Basil Ayish Coordinator, Media Committee
(c) +970-(0)59-817-3953 (email) info@righttoenter.ps

Since 2001, Israel has even frozen the family unification process and barred Palestinians who are citizens of Arab countries (particularly Jordan and Egypt) from coming to visit.

Until 2006, Palestinians with Western citizenship (Europeans and Americans) were able to avoid this comprehensive policy. In the 1990s, they were considered a welcome population (investors, businessmen, academics working in international organizations such as the World Bank). Even if most of them did not get permanent residency, Israel permitted them to live here and visit regularly. This was also the case with Western spouses of Palestinian residents. Until someone in the political echelons decided that this `positive discrimination` (as opposed to citizens of Jordan and Egypt) was intolerable. And from the start of 2006 their entry has been blocked.

It is not clear who the decision-maker is. The coordinator of government activities in the territories told Western diplomats it was the Interior Ministry that made the decision. Interior Ministry officials say it was a joint decision with the Defense Ministry.

Be that as it may, whoever made the decision did not take into account that this was a blow to the strongest circles among the Palestinians - those who speak English, have access to the U.S. State Department, to important journalists, and to the Israeli and international business worlds. They found a way to get together and protest, unlike the tens of thousands of women who have Jordanian citizenship and hide in fear in the West Bank because Israel does not recognize their right to live with their husbands and children.

The change of policy toward Palestinians with Western citizenship was brought to the attention of MK Ephraim Sneh even before he became deputy defense minister. Already then, Sneh was of the opinion that there was no point in changing the policy and that doing so would be harmful to Israel`s interests. In a conversation with Haaretz, he sounded sincere in promising that this policy toward the Americans and Europeans had been canceled and that his bureau was working on new regulations that would `make things simpler rather than making them more complicated, and would alleviate rather than aggravate` the situation. (However, it was possible to understand from this that the regulations would not legalize the stay of thousands, particularly adults and children who remained even though their visas were no longer valid).

But the joy is premature: During the past two weeks, officials continued to prevent the entry even of those who are married and have children here and those who came on a visit. Are these merely `left-overs of the previous situation,` as Sneh put it, or does it testify also to the fact that Sneh is not the sole decision-maker, as was evident with his position on removing the roadblocks?

On the Israeli scene, army commanders (some of them settlers) act together with politicians, jurists and academics who are terrified of the demographic balance. The Green Line does not exist for them. They thought up the Citizenship Law, which crassly expanded the discrimination against Israeli Arabs and intervenes in their right to have a family life.
Amira Hass, Ha'aretz


Anarchists Against the Wall block Central Tel Aviv


Israeli activists have blocked central Tel Aviv with razor wire from the Apartheid Wall. The activists stretched the razor wire across Basel Street with a sign from the Wall that reads in Arabic, Hebrew and English: Mortal Danger-Military Zone. Any person who passes or damages the fence endangers his life.

The twenty activists from Anarchists Against the Wall, who attend the weekly Friday demonstrations against the Apartheid Wall in Bilin, set up the blockade at around 2pm and started handing out flyers to passers by explaining the action.

The action was taken to protest the Apartheid Wall being built through the West Bank, as well as severe travel restrictions on Palestinians. The leaflets remind Israelis that they bear responsibility for the suffering of Palestinians as a result of their governments apartheid policies.

For details contact Yonaton Pollack: 0546327736

Who We Are

Anarchists Against the Wall (AATW) is a direct action group that was established in 2003 in response to the construction of the wall Israel is building on Palestinian land in the Occupied West Bank. The group works in cooperation with Palestinians in a joint non violent struggle against the occupation.

Since its formation, the group has participated in hundreds of demonstrations and direct actions against the wall specifically, and the occupation generally, all over the West Bank. All of AATW's work in Palestine is coordinated through villages' local popular committees and is essentially Palestinian led.

Why We Resist

It is the duty of Israeli citizens to resist immoral policies and actions carried out in out name. We believe that it is possible to do more than demonstrate inside Israel or participate in humanitarian relief actions. Israeli apartheid and occupation isn't going to end by itself - it will end when it becomes ungovernable and unmanageable. It is time to physically oppose the bulldozers, the army and the occupation.

A Brief History

In April 2003, three years into the Second Intifada, a small group of mostly anarchist Israeli activists, already doing various political work in the Occupied Territories formed Anarchists Against the Wall. The group was established around the formation of a protest tent in the village of Mas’ha, where the wall was nearing and would leave 96% of the village's land on the "Israeli" side.

The camp, formed by Palestinian, Israeli and international activists was composed of two tents on the village's land which was slated for confiscation. A constant presence of Palestinian, Israelis and internationals remained for four months. During which, the camp became a center for information dissemination and a base for direct-democracy decision-making. A number of wall related direct actions were planned and prepared at the camp – such as the July 28, 2003 direct action in the Village of Anin. In that action Palestinians, international and Israeli activists managed to force open a gate in the wall in spite of being attacked by the army (See Haaretz article ).

Late in August of 2003, with the wall around Mas'ha nearly completed, the camp moved to the yard of a house in which was slated for demolition. Following two days of blocking the bulldozers and mass arrests, the yard was demolished and the camp ended, but the spirit of resistance it symbolized was not demolished.

In 2004, the village of Budrus began its struggles against the wall and AATW joined their daily demonstrations. Through its persistence in community mobilization, struggle and popular resistance, the village of Budrus was able to achieve significant victories.

Without appealing to the Israeli courts, utilizing only popular resistance, the village succeeded to push the path of wall almost completely off its land.

Budrus' success inspired many other villages to build a popular resistance, which is perhaps an even greater success. For a good part of the year, almost every village to which the construction of the wall reached rose up against it. AATW joined every village that called for its participation.

More recently our actions have been centered in and around the village of Bil'in, northwest of Ramallah, where most of the village's agricultural land is to be effectively confiscated by the wall and an expanding settlement.

Our Role in the Struggle

The mere presence of Israelis at Palestinian civilian actions offers some degree of protection for against army violence.

The Israeli army’s code of conduct is significantly different when Israelis are present and violence, while still severe, is significantly lower. Even though many Israeli activists have been wounded at the demonstrations, some of them seriously, it is the Palestinians who have paid the highest toll. To date, 10 Palestinian demonstrators have been killed in demonstrations against the wall and thousands have been wounded.

The army and the Israeli government try to put an end to Palestinian popular resistance using every form of repression, and to prevent Israeli activists from joining this struggle. Under the occupation's law it is possible to indict people for simply participating in a demonstration. In the course of the last several years, AATW activists have been arrested hundreds of times and dozens of indictments were filed against them.

The legal repression by the Israeli authorities is just another front for the Israeli authorities to try and crack down on resistance. www.awalls.org/about_aatw



Villagers Unite Against Apartheid Road

by Sam, December 23rd

This afternoon over 200 Palestinian, Israeli and international activists participated in a protest against the proposed new settler-only, apartheid road which will run from the Gush Etzion settlement block to the south and illegally annex Palestinian farmland, affect homes and destroy significant heritage sites including a cemetery in the Halhul and Beit Ommar villages near Hebron in the West Bank. 800 dunums of agricultural land from Beit Ommar and 240 dunums from Halhul is being confiscated for the construction of this road, and four large greenhouses belonging to the agricultural college will be demolished. Part of the road will form a viaduct over the existing route 60 .


Dec.23rd. 2006: Several jeeps, a hummer and an APC invaded Hizbe Al Qadim Street in Ramallah Tahta around midnight and demanded entry into a family home by banging with rifle butts on the front door. Forced with complying or having their front door blown open, the family opened and several soldiers were seen entering with large bags. Once inside the soldiers imprisoned the family in one room, blindfolded the son and started interrogating him about his political affiliations as well as banging his head against the door. Soldiers also damaged the walls with rifle butts.

Whilst this was happening other military vehicles continuously shone their searchlights on the windows of neighbouring houses, focusing particularly on one flat. After around an hour the military vehicles left with the soldiers still in the house. Intermittent shooting including automatic gunfire was heard and about an hour later the IOF returned to pick up the occupying soldiers. No one was kidnapped. In the morning some neighbours identified blood on the walls. This event doesnt seem to have received any local media coverage, as scenes like these are played out several times nightly across the West Bank.


BBC World Service Interview with Mary Baxter

Mary: On this occasion some children who were going up at the very top of Tel Rumeida were being stopped from going home from school. For some reason at the top of the hill on private Palestinian land there were a whole lot of settlers having a picnic, a lot of them children. They were being guarded by a number of soldiers. The Palestinian children who were forced to use that way because they are not allowed to go up the street past the Tel Rumeida settlement, and have been told by the army that is the way theyre to go, were not being allowed past to their homes. Now this is against the Israeli law. They rang me because Ive been there so long and understand the situation and the law to some extent although Im not a lawyer. The officers are not very keen to talk to me, they expect me to respond to barked orders as though I was some sort of a dog at times but they will not discuss anything with me.

Interviewer: So you protested, you tried time after time to get some official response to what you saw as a breach of Israeli law by stopping these children. What happened eventually?

Mary: The police came. Now the police over the telephone to someone else had already admitted that it was their job to protect the Palestinian children but the police had not come to do so, so I told the police that they were breaking Israeli law if they did not help these Palestinian children get home. They refused to do that. Instead they said I must get in their jeep and they would take me to the police station and when I protested they said they would take me to the police station and come back to look after the Palestinian children but they did not go back and help out in this situation at all, they stayed at the police station.

Interviewer: Mary, you are 75. Why would you, a widower of a former Anglican priest, want to put yourself through this, why would you want to be in that conflict zone.?

Mary: I think its a call from God, but in Australia we dont talk about God much, but thats what I think it is. The thing that really keeps me there is that Palestinians tell me time and time again that my
being there makes a difference to their lives. I do take risks and I go further with the children than either the army or the settlers want me to go.

Interviewer: Have settlers ever attacked you?

Mary: O yes, lots of times. They attack me outside my house. I dont have to go up near their settlement to be attacked.

Interviewer: And what kind of attack?

Mary: Ive been knocked over when Ive been trying to protect children. Just on the 18th November three different settler women punched me when I was trying to stand between them and Palestinian
children.

Interviewer: Can you ever get any sense from those settlers who are so angry with you, why they think that there shouldnt be Palestinians there?

Mary: No, no, what they do if they talk at all rather than scream, is to rant at you. The men rant, very often with a finger right in my face, that I'm "not objective" but they are free to attack Palestinian children and they are somehow "objective." It just makes absolutely no sense.


The Hamas factor
Robert Malley and Henry Siegman - International Herald Tribune - "There is an alternative, and though it, too, is uncertain, it is far less risky or bloody, and hardly has been given a chance. Hamas wants to govern effectively — that is, without a crippling international siege and Israeli military operations. Although it is not willing to formally renounce violence, it is prepared to abide by a comprehensive cease- fire, and has proved its ability to implement it when Israel fully reciprocates."TOI BillBoard


U.S. Scolds Israel on Plan for West Bank Settlement
Helene Cooper - New York Times - "" In a rare public rebuke to Israel, the Bush administration said Wednesday that an Israeli plan to construct a Jewish settlement in the occupied West Bank for the first time in 10 years could violate the terms of an American-backed peace proposal."TOI Billboard


Twenty Israeli military vehicles stormed Umm Salamuna Village south of Bethlehem to protect four military bulldozers. The bulldozers were massive and there to bulldoze Palestinian land for Wall construction. What they needed protecting from was the nonviolent demonstration that farmers and residents began in order to save their land.

Hundreds of farmers rushed to the area, with people coming from surrounding villages to advocate for the citizens of Umm Salamuna in defending the land.

Village resident Mohammad Brijeh alerted the local media to what was happening at 11:00 am on Tuesday. Quickly confrontations began as the people refused to allow Israeli forces to destroy the Palestinian land. Fist fights and scrambling, rifle butts and fire were the Israeli responses to the farmers.

Six Palestinians were injured, including 70 year old farmer Mousa Mohammad. Israeli soldiers beat him in the head with clubs. He was wrested away by fellow demonstrators and rushed to a neighboring village`s medical center for treatment. Twenty seven year old Amer has bruises all over his body and internal injuries due to a violent beating with clubs and rifle butts.

President of the Umm Salamuna Village Council, Mahmoud Rashid, said that the Israelis intend to overtake 700 dunams of this area for the Wall. `The land is planted with trees, grapevines and olives, which is all for the families of the village, with a population of about 1,000 people.”

The Village Council President reiterated a sentiment becoming more common in international, and even in some Israeli, discourse. “Israeli forces aim to confiscate more Palestinian land with this Wall. Their claim that it has anything to do with security reasons is false.”

TOI-Billboard current issue  http://toibillboard.info/index.htm



THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY - DR. ROWAN WILLIAMS

"The wall which we walked through a little while ago is a sign not simply of a sign of a passing problem in the politics of one region; it is sign of some of the things that are most deeply wrong in the human heart itself. That terrible fear of the other and the stranger which keeps all of us in one another kind of prison.

In one of the hymns which we sing in English during the Advent season we sing about Jesus Christ as the One who comes the prison bars to break. And it is our prayer and our hope for all of you that the prison of poverty and disadvantage, and the prison of fear and anxiety will alike be broken. We are here on pilgrimage because we trust that 2000 years ago an event took place here which assured us that these prisons could be broken, broken by the act of a God in whose sight all are equally precious: Palestinian, Israeli, Jewish, Christian and Moslem. A God for whom all lives are so equally precious that the death of any one is an affront to all. That is why we are here.

We are not here to visit an ancient and interesting site. We are not here to visit a museum and we are not here to visit a theme park. We are here to visit a place and people whose very existence speaks of the freedom of God to set human beings free That is a truth which remains day after day, year after year, millennium after millennium. It is that good news that has driven us here. It is that good news which has teaches us not to despair even in the terrible circumstances in which so many of you now live."




Israel's separation wall/barrier inside the West Bank confiscates Palestinian land and separates Palestinian communities. Dwarfing the Berlin Wall, it serves not solely security, but reaches deep into the West Bank to encompass major illegal Jewish settlements. Palestinians in the West Bank are increasingly penned into ghettoes that resemble the Bantustans of apartheid South Africa.Bi'lin where IOF violence escalated at recent protest.


Settlers are continuing to place mobile homes and trailers in West Bank
By Amos Harel, Haaretz Correspondent and The Associated Press


Settlers are continuing to place mobile homes and trailers in West Bank outposts and settlements, without legal permits. Civil Administration reports show that since the start of the second Lebanon war in July, some 200 mobile homes have been placed. This is a substantial increase over the few dozen trailers placed in the first half of the year.

Both the Israel Defefense Forces' office in charge of the West Bank and the settlement watchdog group Peace Now disputed the claims.

Civil Administration spokesman Shlomo Dror said "there were attempts to transfer trailers, but except for one or two we managed to stop it."

Dror Etkes, who monitors settlement activity for Peace Now, said he was "surprised" by the report, and wasn't aware of any large
movement of trailers over the past six months.

"This doesn't match what I know about what's been going on in the West Bank in recent months," Etkes said.

Despite declarations by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Defense Minister Amir Peretz, there has been apparently no progress toward dismantling outposts.

Since the beginning of the month, nearly 90 trailers were placed illegally in the West Bank. A Defense Ministry aerial survey found new mobile homes in illegal outposts such as Givat Assaf, near Beit El, and Amona, near Ofra. Some of the new mobile homes were also placed in veteran settlements.

The Yesha Council of settlements says the number is lower than the 200 stated by the Civil Administration and that most of the buildings spotted in the latest aerial survey were simply never identified before.

The red tape and foot dragging in dismantling outposts is creating a legal tangle as demolition orders expire, which will further delay the eventual resumption of evacuation procedures.

Last update - 09:32 31/12/2006

Making the law a laughingstock

By Haaretz Editorial


Virtually not a week goes by without a new revelation, each more sensational and revolting than the previous one, about the building spree in West Bank settlements, in blatant violation of the law and in complete contradiction to official government policy. All this is happening with the knowledge of the defense officials responsible for enforcing the law in the territories, and with cooperation - by commission or omission - from the political echelon. The latest discovery does not rely on external sources such as Peace Now, which specializes in monitoring and documenting activity in the Land of the Settlers. Amos Harel's report in Friday's Haaretz about the 200 mobile homes that have been placed in the West Bank during the past six months quotes documents prepared by the Civil Administration - the body responsible for enforcing planning and construction laws in the area.

In the middle of last week, it was reported that Defense Minister Amir Peretz had authorized the repopulation of Maskiot, an abandoned Nahal Brigade outpost. Thirty new homes will be set up there for evacuees from Gush Katif, in the Gaza Strip. Maskiot is one of a long list of communities established beyond the Green Line that have been completely untouched by the government's commitment under the road map: to freeze all settlement activities, including "natural growth." Two weeks ago, Attorney General Menachem Mazuz notified Peretz that according to data he received from the Civil Administration, construction in the illegal outposts is continuing, including the construction of permanent structures. Mazuz listed 168 illegal structures that had been identified in the settlements and outposts over the past year.

It will soon be two years since the government decided, in response to a report on the outposts drafted by attorney Talia Sasson, "to keep its commitment to dismantle unauthorized outposts set up since March 2001." As a result of this delay, the demolition orders issued against some of the outposts are close to expiry, a fact that will make the evacuations more difficult, if such a day ever comes. According to last Friday's report, the Israel Defense Forces have not presented a detailed plan or a timetable for evacuating the outposts. Instead, for some months now, the defense minister has been involved in negotiations with the leaders of the Yesha Council of settlements in an effort to reach an agreement on the voluntary evacuation of some outposts and the relocation of the rest to within the boundaries of the "mother" settlements.

The agreement being formulated with the settlers is reminiscent of the outposts agreement of October 1999, in which then prime and defense minister Ehud Barak reached a deal with the Yesha Council to evacuate a mere 11 outposts (four of which were empty), out of a total of 42 illegal outposts. At the time, Barak was praised for this "precedent," in which the Yesha Council and even some of the right's political leaders expressed their willingness to cooperate with the government in carrying out a decision to evacuate communities in the territories. He argued that the agreement with the "mainstream" settlers would "contribute to bolstering the rule of law." But according to the Sasson report, now collecting dust in government ministries, since that "precedent" was established, at least 60 more outposts have been set up - most with government assistance, and all while the army turned a blind eye. It seems that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert adheres to that same longstanding tradition of "bolstering the rule of law."