
news from palestine

.................................
This documentary explores
the life and work of a Jewish National Fund
administrator who was responsible for Jewish
settlements in the Galilee in the 30s and 40s.
Nachmani left behind fascinating diaries that
shed light upon the authorís complex and
contradictory personality and examine critical
years of Zionism and the beginning of the
Jewish-Arab conflict from the unique perspective
of a man who displayed determination and
persistence on one hand, and fear and doubt on
the other. The film will be followed by a panel
discussion with Dalia Karpel, Director of
The Diaries of Yosef Nachmani, and Uri S.
Cohen, Assistant Professor of Hebrew
Literature, Department of Middle East and Asian
Languages and Cultures, Columbia University, and
moderated by Richard Pena, Program
Director, Film Society of Lincoln Center, and
Associate Professor, School of the Arts, Film
Division, Columbia University.
http://www.kibush.co.il/show_file.asp?num=18582
Campaign for Right to Entry
Press Conference
January 14th, 2007 |
Posted in Press Releases, Denial of entry
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
by the Campaign
for the Right to Entry,
The Campaign for Right to
Entry/Re-entry will be holding a press conference
on the new developments in Israels denial
of entry policy
The Campaign for Right of Entry/Re-entry will
provide the notice recently issued by the Israeli
Authorities that changes Israels policy of
denying entry to foreign nationals traveling into
the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt). The
notice outlines new procedures regarding access
to the West Bank for foreign nationals.
The Campaign regards this as a rare moment
where the Israeli Authorities acknowledge in
writing the severe humanitarian crisis brought on
by Israeli policies of denying foreign nationals
the right to family reunification and entry to
the oPt. Yet the crisis directly affecting over
45,000 foreign nationals remains unresolved.
The Campaign will present an analysis of the
recent developments .
First hand stories from foreign nationals denied
entry and renewal since the new policies were
announced will be heard - private interviews will
be available upon request.
The Jerusalem
Center for Legal Aid will present a legal
analysis of the new document and policies.
Location: Palestinian Media Center (PMC), Ramallah
Al-Quds-Nablus
St. , AL -Abraj Al-Watanieh Bldg.,3rd fl. Al
Bireh 02-2407721-5
Time: Tuesday, January 16th at 11:00 AM
Transportation will be available to the Press
Conference in Ramallah from the American Colony
Hotel in East Jerusalem at 10:15 AM. Please call
Subha on 0599-644868 to reserve a seat on the
bus.
Translation from Arabic to English and Hebrew
will be available on site.
Israeli Occupation
Government Builds a New Synagogue Near
Al-Aqsa Mosque, Inside the Palestinian Area
New synagogue near Al-Aqsa
Mosque
PNN, (Jerusalem) Palestine
News Network Thursday, 11 January 2007
www.aljazeerah.info
Residents of occupied East
Jerusalem's Old City are requesting international
assistance as Israeli occupation forces move
forward with plans to build a Jewish Synagogue in
the heart of the Palestinian area. The exact
location is just 50 meters from the Al-Aqsa
Mosque, which is itself already under threat.
In a field visit by the
Al-Aqsa Media Foundation, Walid Al-Zerba and
Ismail Al-Duwaik, the potential damage was
recorded. The construction is adjacent to
Al-Zerba's home.
He said, A month ago
they began bringing in the equipment and staring
the work on an area of 200 meters squared taken
for the Jews after the Israeli occupation of
Jerusalem began in 1967. The first step was a
synagogue and at the same time they started work
on another structure on a plot of land belonging
to the Department of Islamic Endowments covering
an area of 70 meters squared.
Al-Zerba told PNN,
This matter summoned our intervention and
we demanded of the workers to know who was
responsible for the work they were doing, but
they said that they were merely do cleaning and
maintenance around the Muslim site and that they
were not attempting to steal the plot of
earth.
He continued, But
these statements were not correct. Vehicles and
armed soldiers began pouring into the area and a
few days ago began construction that made it
clear it is a synagogue. The door is on the south
side, also making it clear that the next target
is the adjacent Islamic Endowments' plot of
land.
The Israeli land-grab for
Jerusalem and the illegal annexation has been
ongoing for years. The concern is how many of
these changes will be reversible if
international law is ever upheld in the city.
United Nations Resolution
35 is just one of many that addresses the issue
of the Israeli colonization of Jerusalem.
The 'Basic Law' on Jerusalem and the
proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of
Israel are null and void and must be
rescinded.
***Military prison commander, First Sgt.
Maj. suspended over misconduct.
by Amos Harel
Haaretz
Correspondent
The commander of military prison number
six, a military detention base in northern Israel,
and a unit first sergeant major were suspended on
Thursday following a surprise inspection of the
prison base.After fielding numerous complaints
from soldiers, head of the Israel Defense Forces
human resources department, Major General Elazar
Stern, launched a surprise inspection which
focused on the treatment of individuals at the
base.
The inspection revealed severe failures in the
management of the base as well as failures in the
way in which senior officers treated their
subordinates. The commander of the base and the
first sergeant major were discovered to act
offensively and inappropriately towards their
subordinates, as well as instilling
disproportionate fear among all the unit's
soldiers.
The two men accused of misconduct were summoned
for questioning by the head of the military
police, Brigadier General Ron Benny, who decided
to suspend them for two weeks. In addition, Benny
ordered an inquiry into the conduct of the
military prison base.
Military sources said in response to the findings
that the behavior revealed in this incident has
no room in the IDF and should be condemned.
***Indeed there is Apartheid in Israel
By Shulamit Aloni
Hebrew original:
http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3346283,00.html
Yediot Acharonot, Israel's largest
circulating newspaper
A new order issued by the GOC Central command
bans the conveyance of Palestinians in Israeli
vehicles. Such a blatant violation of the right
to travel joins the long list of humans rights
violations carried out by Israel in the
[Occupied] Territories.
Jewish self-righteousness is taken for granted
among ourselves to such an extent that we fail to
see what's right in front of our eyes. It's
simply inconceivable that the ultimate victims,
the Jews, can carry out evil deeds. Nevertheless,
the state of Israel practises its own, quite
violent, form of Apartheid with the native
Palestinian population.
The US Jewish Establishment's onslaught on former
President Jimmy Carter is based on him daring to
tell the truth which is known to all: through its
army, the government of Israel practises a brutal
form of Apartheid in the territory it occupies.
Its army has turned every Palestinian village and
town into a fenced-in, or blocked-in, detention
camp. All this is done in order to keep an eye on
the
population's movements and to make its life
difficult. Israel even imposes a total curfew
whenever
the settlers, who have illegally usurped the
Palestinians' land, celebrate their holidays or
conduct their parades.
If that were not enough, the generals commanding
the region frequently issue further orders,
regulations, instructions and rules (let us not
forget: they are the lords of the land). By now
they
have requisitioned further lands for the purpose
of constructing "Jewish only" roads.
Wonderful roads, wide roads, well-paved roads,
brightly lit at night - all that on stolen land.
When a Palestinian drives on such a road, his
vehicle is confiscated and he is sent on his way.
On one occasion I witnessed such an encounter
between a driver and a soldier who was taking
down the details before confiscating the vehicle
and sending its owner away. "Why?" I
asked the
soldier. "It's an order - this is a
Jews-only road", he replied. I inquired as
to where was the
sign indicating this fact and instructing [other]
drivers not to use it. His answer was nothing
short of amazing. "It is his responsibility
to know it, and besides, what do you want us to
do, put up a sign here and let some antisemitic
reporter or journalist take a photo so he that
can show the world that Apartheid exists
here?"
Indeed Apartheid does exist here. And our army is
not "the most moral army in the world"
as we are told by its commanders. Sufficient to
mention that every town and every village has
turned
into a detention centre and that every entry and
every exit has been closed, cutting it off from
arterial traffic. If it were not enough that
Palestinians are not allowed to travel on the
roads paved 'for Jews only', on their land, the
current GOC found it necessary to land an
additional blow on the natives in their own land
with an "ingenious proposal".
Humanitarian activists cannot transport
Palestinians either
Major-General Naveh, renowned for his superior
patriotism, has issued a new order. Coming into
affect on 19 January, it prohibits the conveyance
of Palestinians without a permit. The order
determines that Israelis are not allowed to
transport Palestinians in an Israeli vehicle (one
registered in Israel regardless of what kind of
numberplate it carries) unless they have received
explicit permission to do so. The permit relates
to both the driver and the Palestinian passenger.
Of course none of this applies to those whose
labour serves the settlers. They and their
employers will naturally receive the required
permits so they can continue to serve the lords
of the land, the settlers.
Did man of peace President Carter truly err in
concluding that Israel is creating Apartheid? Did
he exaggerate? Don't the US Jewish community
leaders recognise the International Convention on
the
Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination
of 7 March 1966, to which Israel is a signatory?
Are the US Jews who launched the loud and abusive
campaign against Carter for supposedly maligning
Israel's character and its democratic and
humanist nature unfamiliar with the International
Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of
the Crime of Apartheid of 30 November 1973?
Apartheid is defined therein as an international
crime that among other things includes using
different legal instruments to rule over
different racial groups, thus depriving people of
their human rights. Isn't freedom of travel one
of these rights?
In the past, the US Jewish community leaders were
quite familiar with the meaning of those
conventions. For some reason, however, they are
convinced that Israel is allowed to contravene
them. It's OK to kill civilians, women and
children, old people and parents with their
children, deliberately or otherwise without
accepting any responsibility. It's permissible to
rob people of their lands, destroy their crops,
and cage them up like animals in the zoo. From
now on, Israelis and International humanitarian
organisations' volunteers are prohibited from
assisting a woman in labour by taking her to the
hospital. [Israeli human rights group] Yesh Din
volunteers cannot take a robbed and beaten-up
Palestinian to the police station to lodge a
complaint. (Police stations are located at the
heart of the settlements.) Is there anyone who
believes that this is not Apartheid?
Jimmy Carter does not need me to defend his
reputation that has been sullied by Israelophile
community officials. The trouble is that their
love of Israel distorts their judgment and blinds
them
from seeing what's in front of them. Israel is an
occupying power that for 40 years has been
oppressing an indigenous people, which is
entitled to a sovereign and independent existence
while living in peace with us. We should remember
that we too used very violent terror against
foreign rule because we wanted our own state. And
the list of victims of terror is quite long and
extensive.
We do limit ourselves to denying the
[Palestinian] people human rights. We not only
rob of them of their freedom, land and water. We
apply collective punishment to millions of people
and even, in revenge-driven frenzy, destroy the
electricity supply for one and half million
civilians. Let them "sit in the
darkness" and "starve".
Employees cannot be paid their wages because
Israel is holding 500 million shekels that belong
to the Palestinians. And after all that we
remain "pure as the driven snow". There
are no moral
blemishes on our actions. There is no racial
separation. There is no Apartheid. It's an
invention of the enemies of Israel. Hooray for
our brothers and sisters in the US! Your devotion
is very much appreciated. You have truly removed
a nasty stain from us. Now there can be an extra
spring in our step as we confidently abuse the
Palestinian population, using the "most
moral army in the world".
[Translated by Sol Salbe]from Mohammed Omer, www.rafahtoday.org
|
***Dahamesh
Village near Ramla in imminent danger of destruction
By Nori Al-Okbi,
Beduin Rights Defence Association
6/1/2007
(Email sending-TOI-Billboard,
January 6, 2007)
The village of Dahamesh near Ramla is in imminent danger
of destruction. The village has close to a thousand
inhabitants, who are denied all municipal services. Their
houses were given demolition notices, and the entire
village is in imminent danger of being demolished and
completely erased. Five families living crowded in a
single house, among the many who received such demolition
orders, have be3en informed that their house is
next in line when destroyers next arrive in
the village. The village is located at the Lod Valley
Area, on a piece of privately-owned land 160 dunums
(about 40 acres) in size, It had been founded in 1932,
with the encouragement of the then mayor of Ramlah.
The Present Mayor of Ramla, Yoel Lavi, notorious for
various racist anti-Arab statements, has declared that
The solution for this village is Two
D-9 bulldozers, accompanied by two companies of Border
Guards (Riot Police). Once these become available,
The bulldozers will move freely, from one side of
the village to another.
No one in authority has reprimanded the mayor for his
words. We call upon the Prime Minister and the Ministers
of Justice and of the Interior to end the cruel policy of
demolitions against the Arab citizens of Israel.
We call upon all civic organizations in and outside
Israel to intervene with the authorities and demand an
end to this brutal policy.
A protest tent was erected at Dahamesh Village. All
visitors, press reporters, observers and solidarity
delegations are most welcome.
Contact:
Arafat Ismail, Head of the Dahamesh Village local
Association 052-3202055
Nori Al-Okbi, Head of The Beduin Rights Defence
Association 054-54605565
Campaign for the Right of Entry
Announcements of Israeli Change of Policy
Unfounded in Reality
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
by the
http://www.righttoenter.ps/
Despite assurances relayed by American and European
diplomats, foreign passport holders trying to join their
families in the Israeli occupied Palestinian territory
(oPt), including Bethlehem, for the holidays are being
denied entry and expelled by Israel.
On Friday the 15th edition of the English newspaper,
Palestine Times, reported that a senior American diplomat
announced that Israel had annulled a previous decision
banning entry to foreign passport holders who have family
residing in the Palestinian areas and was resuming its
earlier practice of issuing three month renewable visas
that would allow them to visit and live together with
their families. Attempts to understand from US officials
more details surrounding this announcement
have been unsuccessful, to date.
In stark contrast to that announcement, at least three
foreign nationals attempting to join their families in
the Israeli occupied Palestinian territory were expelled
last week.
1)Kamal, an eighteen-year old US college student who had
come to visit his grandfather and family in Ramallah over
the holidays was denied entry at Ben Gurion airport on
Saturday December 16th.
2)Another Palestinian American from Cleveland, Ohio,
Linda Ali Mahmmud, who is deaf and dumb like her brother
Shukri, had traveled in the hopes of spending the
holidays with her cancer stricken aunt but was denied
entry at Ben Gurion airport on Thursday December 14th,
allegedly because Shukri had overstayed his permit.
Shukri had requested a routine permit renewal in October,
however, the Israeli Ministry of Interior liaison at the
Israeli Civil Administration suddenly stopped processing
renewals for foreigners married to Palestinian ID-holders
and refuses to accept Shukris application.
3)Abdullah, a German national, who works for the
International Peace & Cooperation Center in
Jerusalem, had hopes of reuniting with his wife, who
carries a Palestinian ID and their newborn child
following statements made last week by European diplomats
regarding Israels policy change. He was denied entry for
the fourth time at the Allenby Bridge on Wednesday the
20th of December.
Arbitrary denials of entry and expulsions have not
stopped. No transparent rules or mechanisms are in place
so far. Palestinian families, vital service providers and
businesses remain vulnerable to
arbitrary denial of entry and residency. This is
especially hard to accept at a time of major Christian
and Muslim traditional festivities when families want to
be together more then ever, said Anita Abdullah speaking
for the Campaign for the Right of Entry to the oPt .
The U.S. government estimates that there are about 35,000
Palestinian Americans living in the West Bank at any one
time, and an additional 10,000 Palestinians with other
foreign passports. All these people and their families
remain separated or at risk, and Palestinian educational
and social service institutions, humanitarian agencies
and businesses remain vulnerable to the loss of critical
personnel, until applications for entry and residency in
the oPt are decided in accordance with a clear,
transparent and internationally lawful policy.
Contact: Basil Ayish Coordinator, Media Committee
(c) +970-(0)59-817-3953 (email) info@righttoenter.ps
Since 2001, Israel has even frozen the family
unification process and barred Palestinians who
are citizens of Arab countries (particularly
Jordan and Egypt) from coming to visit.
Until 2006, Palestinians with Western citizenship
(Europeans and Americans) were able to avoid this
comprehensive policy. In the 1990s, they were
considered a welcome population (investors,
businessmen, academics working in international
organizations such as the World Bank). Even if
most of them did not get permanent residency,
Israel permitted them to live here and visit
regularly. This was also the case with Western
spouses of Palestinian residents. Until someone
in the political echelons decided that this
`positive discrimination` (as opposed to citizens
of Jordan and Egypt) was intolerable. And from
the start of 2006 their entry has been blocked.
It is not clear who the decision-maker is. The
coordinator of government activities in the
territories told Western diplomats it was the
Interior Ministry that made the decision.
Interior Ministry officials say it was a joint
decision with the Defense Ministry.
Be that as it may, whoever made the decision did
not take into account that this was a blow to the
strongest circles among the Palestinians - those
who speak English, have access to the U.S. State
Department, to important journalists, and to the
Israeli and international business worlds. They
found a way to get together and protest, unlike
the tens of thousands of women who have Jordanian
citizenship and hide in fear in the West Bank
because Israel does not recognize their right to
live with their husbands and children.
The change of policy toward Palestinians with
Western citizenship was brought to the attention
of MK Ephraim Sneh even before he became deputy
defense minister. Already then, Sneh was of the
opinion that there was no point in changing the
policy and that doing so would be harmful to
Israel`s interests. In a conversation with
Haaretz, he sounded sincere in promising that
this policy toward the Americans and Europeans
had been canceled and that his bureau was working
on new regulations that would `make things
simpler rather than making them more complicated,
and would alleviate rather than aggravate` the
situation. (However, it was possible to
understand from this that the regulations would
not legalize the stay of thousands, particularly
adults and children who remained even though
their visas were no longer valid).
But the joy is premature: During the past two
weeks, officials continued to prevent the entry
even of those who are married and have children
here and those who came on a visit. Are these
merely `left-overs of the previous situation,` as
Sneh put it, or does it testify also to the fact
that Sneh is not the sole decision-maker, as was
evident with his position on removing the
roadblocks?
On the Israeli scene, army commanders (some of
them settlers) act together with politicians,
jurists and academics who are terrified of the
demographic balance. The Green Line does not
exist for them. They thought up the Citizenship
Law, which crassly expanded the discrimination
against Israeli Arabs and intervenes in their
right to have a family life.
Amira Hass, Ha'aretz |

Anarchists Against the Wall block Central Tel Aviv
Israeli activists have blocked central Tel Aviv with
razor wire from the Apartheid Wall. The activists
stretched the razor wire across Basel Street with a sign
from the Wall that reads in Arabic, Hebrew and English:
Mortal Danger-Military Zone. Any person who passes or
damages the fence endangers his life.
The twenty activists from Anarchists Against the Wall,
who attend the weekly Friday demonstrations against the
Apartheid Wall in Bilin, set up the blockade at around
2pm and started handing out flyers to passers by
explaining the action.
The action was taken to protest the Apartheid Wall being
built through the West Bank, as well as severe travel
restrictions on Palestinians. The leaflets remind
Israelis that they bear responsibility for the suffering
of Palestinians as a result of their governments
apartheid policies.
For details contact Yonaton Pollack: 0546327736

Who We Are
Anarchists Against the Wall (AATW) is a direct
action group that was established in 2003 in
response to the construction of the wall Israel
is building on Palestinian land in the Occupied
West Bank. The group works in cooperation with
Palestinians in a joint non violent struggle
against the occupation.
Since its formation, the group has
participated in hundreds of demonstrations and
direct actions against the wall specifically, and
the occupation generally, all over the West Bank.
All of AATW's work in Palestine is coordinated
through villages' local popular committees and is
essentially Palestinian led.
Why We Resist
It is the duty of Israeli citizens to resist
immoral policies and actions carried out in out
name. We believe that it is possible to do more
than demonstrate inside Israel or participate in
humanitarian relief actions. Israeli apartheid
and occupation isn't going to end by itself - it
will end when it becomes ungovernable and
unmanageable. It is time to physically oppose the
bulldozers, the army and the occupation.
A Brief History
In April 2003, three years into the Second
Intifada, a small group of mostly anarchist
Israeli activists, already doing various
political work in the Occupied Territories formed
Anarchists Against the Wall. The group was
established around the formation of a protest
tent in the village of Masha, where the
wall was nearing and would leave 96% of the
village's land on the "Israeli" side.
The camp, formed by Palestinian, Israeli and
international activists was composed of two tents
on the village's land which was slated for
confiscation. A constant presence of Palestinian,
Israelis and internationals remained for four
months. During which, the camp became a center
for information dissemination and a base for
direct-democracy decision-making. A number of
wall related direct actions were planned and
prepared at the camp such as the July 28,
2003 direct action in the Village of Anin. In
that action Palestinians, international and
Israeli activists managed to force open a gate in
the wall in spite of being attacked by the army (See
Haaretz article ).
Late in August of 2003, with the wall around
Mas'ha nearly completed, the camp moved to the
yard of a house in which was slated for
demolition. Following two days of blocking the
bulldozers and mass arrests, the yard was
demolished and the camp ended, but the spirit of
resistance it symbolized was not demolished.
In 2004, the village of Budrus began its
struggles against the wall and AATW joined their
daily demonstrations. Through its persistence in
community mobilization, struggle and popular
resistance, the village of Budrus was able to
achieve significant victories.
Without appealing to the Israeli courts,
utilizing only popular resistance, the village
succeeded to push the path of wall almost
completely off its land.
Budrus' success inspired many other villages
to build a popular resistance, which is perhaps
an even greater success. For a good part of the
year, almost every village to which the
construction of the wall reached rose up against
it. AATW joined every village that called for its
participation.
More recently our actions have been centered
in and around the village of Bil'in, northwest of
Ramallah, where most of the village's
agricultural land is to be effectively
confiscated by the wall and an expanding
settlement.
Our Role in the Struggle
The mere presence of Israelis at Palestinian
civilian actions offers some degree of protection
for against army violence.
The Israeli armys code of conduct is
significantly different when Israelis are present
and violence, while still severe, is
significantly lower. Even though many Israeli
activists have been wounded at the
demonstrations, some of them seriously, it is the
Palestinians who have paid the highest toll. To
date, 10 Palestinian demonstrators have been
killed in demonstrations against the wall and
thousands have been wounded.
The army and the Israeli government try to put
an end to Palestinian popular resistance using
every form of repression, and to prevent Israeli
activists from joining this struggle. Under the
occupation's law it is possible to indict people
for simply participating in a demonstration. In
the course of the last several years, AATW
activists have been arrested hundreds of times
and dozens of indictments were filed against
them.
The legal repression by the Israeli
authorities is just another front for the Israeli
authorities to try and crack down on resistance. www.awalls.org/about_aatw
|
Villagers Unite Against Apartheid Road
by Sam, December 23rd
This afternoon over 200 Palestinian, Israeli and
international activists participated in a protest against
the proposed new settler-only, apartheid road which will
run from the Gush Etzion settlement block to the south
and illegally annex Palestinian farmland, affect homes
and destroy significant heritage sites including a
cemetery in the Halhul and Beit Ommar villages near
Hebron in the West Bank. 800 dunums of agricultural land
from Beit Ommar and 240 dunums from Halhul is being
confiscated for the construction of this road, and four
large greenhouses belonging to the agricultural college
will be demolished. Part of the road will form a viaduct
over the existing route 60 .
Dec.23rd. 2006:
Several jeeps, a hummer and an APC invaded Hizbe Al Qadim
Street in Ramallah Tahta around midnight and demanded
entry into a family home by banging with rifle butts on
the front door. Forced with complying or having their
front door blown open, the family opened and several
soldiers were seen entering with large bags. Once inside
the soldiers imprisoned the family in one room,
blindfolded the son and started interrogating him about
his political affiliations as well as banging his head
against the door. Soldiers also damaged the walls with
rifle butts.
Whilst this was happening other military vehicles
continuously shone their searchlights on the windows of
neighbouring houses, focusing particularly on one flat.
After around an hour the military vehicles left with the
soldiers still in the house. Intermittent shooting
including automatic gunfire was heard and about an hour
later the IOF returned to pick up the occupying soldiers.
No one was kidnapped. In the morning some neighbours
identified blood on the walls. This event doesnt seem to
have received any local media coverage, as scenes like
these are played out several times nightly across the
West Bank.
BBC World Service Interview with Mary
Baxter
Mary: On this occasion some children who were going up at
the very top of Tel Rumeida were being stopped from going
home from school. For some reason at the top of the hill
on private Palestinian land there were a whole lot of
settlers having a picnic, a lot of them children. They
were being guarded by a number of soldiers. The
Palestinian children who were forced to use that way
because they are not allowed to go up the street past the
Tel Rumeida settlement, and have been told by the army
that is the way theyre to go, were not being allowed past
to their homes. Now this is against the Israeli law. They
rang me because Ive been there so long and understand the
situation and the law to some extent although Im not a
lawyer. The officers are not very keen to talk to me,
they expect me to respond to barked orders as though I
was some sort of a dog at times but they will not discuss
anything with me.
Interviewer: So you protested, you tried time after time
to get some official response to what you saw as a breach
of Israeli law by stopping these children. What happened
eventually?
Mary: The police came. Now the police over the telephone
to someone else had already admitted that it was their
job to protect the Palestinian children but the police
had not come to do so, so I told the police that they
were breaking Israeli law if they did not help these
Palestinian children get home. They refused to do that.
Instead they said I must get in their jeep and they would
take me to the police station and when I protested they
said they would take me to the police station and come
back to look after the Palestinian children but they did
not go back and help out in this situation at all, they
stayed at the police station.
Interviewer: Mary, you are 75. Why would you, a widower
of a former Anglican priest, want to put yourself through
this, why would you want to be in that conflict zone.?
Mary: I think its a call from God, but in Australia we
dont talk about God much, but thats what I think it is.
The thing that really keeps me there is that Palestinians
tell me time and time again that my
being there makes a difference to their lives. I do take
risks and I go further with the children than either the
army or the settlers want me to go.
Interviewer: Have settlers ever attacked you?
Mary: O yes, lots of times. They attack me outside my
house. I dont have to go up near their settlement to be
attacked.
Interviewer: And what kind of attack?
Mary: Ive been knocked over when Ive been trying to
protect children. Just on the 18th November three
different settler women punched me when I was trying to
stand between them and Palestinian
children.
Interviewer: Can you ever get any sense from those
settlers who are so angry with you, why they think that
there shouldnt be Palestinians there?
Mary: No, no, what they do if they talk at all rather
than scream, is to rant at you. The men rant, very often
with a finger right in my face, that I'm "not
objective" but they are free to attack Palestinian
children and they are somehow "objective." It
just makes absolutely no sense.
The
Hamas factor
Robert Malley and Henry Siegman - International Herald
Tribune - "There is an alternative, and though it,
too, is uncertain, it is far less risky or bloody, and
hardly has been given a chance. Hamas wants to govern
effectively that is, without a crippling
international siege and Israeli military operations.
Although it is not willing to formally renounce violence,
it is prepared to abide by a comprehensive cease- fire,
and has proved its ability to implement it when Israel
fully reciprocates."TOI BillBoard
U.S.
Scolds Israel on Plan for West Bank Settlement
Helene Cooper - New York Times - "" In a rare
public rebuke to Israel, the Bush administration said
Wednesday that an Israeli plan to construct a Jewish
settlement in the occupied West Bank for the first time
in 10 years could violate the terms of an American-backed
peace proposal."TOI Billboard
Twenty Israeli military vehicles stormed Umm Salamuna
Village south of Bethlehem to protect four military
bulldozers. The bulldozers were massive and there to
bulldoze Palestinian land for Wall construction. What
they needed protecting from was the nonviolent
demonstration that farmers and residents began in order
to save their land.
Hundreds of farmers rushed to the area, with people
coming from surrounding villages to advocate for the
citizens of Umm Salamuna in defending the land.
Village resident Mohammad Brijeh alerted the local media
to what was happening at 11:00 am on Tuesday. Quickly
confrontations began as the people refused to allow
Israeli forces to destroy the Palestinian land. Fist
fights and scrambling, rifle butts and fire were the
Israeli responses to the farmers.
Six Palestinians were injured, including 70 year old
farmer Mousa Mohammad. Israeli soldiers beat him in the
head with clubs. He was wrested away by fellow
demonstrators and rushed to a neighboring village`s
medical center for treatment. Twenty seven year old Amer
has bruises all over his body and internal injuries due
to a violent beating with clubs and rifle butts.
President of the Umm Salamuna Village Council, Mahmoud
Rashid, said that the Israelis intend to overtake 700
dunams of this area for the Wall. `The land is planted
with trees, grapevines and olives, which is all for the
families of the village, with a population of about 1,000
people.
The Village Council President reiterated a sentiment
becoming more common in international, and even in some
Israeli, discourse. Israeli forces aim to
confiscate more Palestinian land with this Wall. Their
claim that it has anything to do with security reasons is
false.
TOI-Billboard current
issue http://toibillboard.info/index.htm

THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY - DR. ROWAN WILLIAMS
"The wall which we walked through a little while ago
is a sign not simply of a sign of a passing problem in
the politics of one region; it is sign of some of the
things that are most deeply wrong in the human heart
itself. That terrible fear of the other and the stranger
which keeps all of us in one another kind of prison.
In one of the hymns which we sing in English during the
Advent season we sing about Jesus Christ as the One who
comes the prison bars to break. And it is our prayer and
our hope for all of you that the prison of poverty and
disadvantage, and the prison of fear and anxiety will
alike be broken. We are here on pilgrimage because we
trust that 2000 years ago an event took place here which
assured us that these prisons could be broken, broken by
the act of a God in whose sight all are equally precious:
Palestinian, Israeli, Jewish, Christian and Moslem. A God
for whom all lives are so equally precious that the death
of any one is an affront to all. That is why we are here.
We are not here to visit an ancient and interesting site.
We are not here to visit a museum and we are not here to
visit a theme park. We are here to visit a place and
people whose very existence speaks of the freedom of God
to set human beings free That is a truth which remains
day after day, year after year, millennium after
millennium. It is that good news that has driven us here.
It is that good news which has teaches us not to despair
even in the terrible circumstances in which so many of
you now live."

Israel's separation wall/barrier inside
the West Bank confiscates Palestinian land and separates
Palestinian communities. Dwarfing the Berlin Wall, it
serves not solely security, but reaches deep into the
West Bank to encompass major illegal Jewish settlements.
Palestinians in the West Bank are increasingly penned
into ghettoes that resemble the Bantustans of apartheid
South Africa.Bi'lin where IOF violence escalated
at recent protest.
Settlers
are continuing to place mobile homes and trailers in West
Bank
By Amos Harel, Haaretz Correspondent and The Associated
Press
Settlers are continuing to place mobile
homes and trailers in West Bank outposts and settlements,
without legal permits. Civil Administration reports show
that since the start of the second Lebanon war in July,
some 200 mobile homes have been placed. This is a
substantial increase over the few dozen trailers placed
in the first half of the year.
Both the Israel Defefense Forces' office in charge of the
West Bank and the settlement watchdog group Peace Now
disputed the claims.
Civil Administration spokesman Shlomo Dror said
"there were attempts to transfer trailers, but
except for one or two we managed to stop it."
Dror Etkes, who monitors settlement activity for Peace
Now, said he was "surprised" by the report, and
wasn't aware of any large
movement of trailers over the past six months.
"This doesn't match what I know about what's been
going on in the West Bank in recent months," Etkes
said.
Despite declarations by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and
Defense Minister Amir Peretz, there has been apparently
no progress toward dismantling outposts.
Since the beginning of the month, nearly 90 trailers were
placed illegally in the West Bank. A Defense Ministry
aerial survey found new mobile homes in illegal outposts
such as Givat Assaf, near Beit El, and Amona, near Ofra.
Some of the new mobile homes were also placed in veteran
settlements.
The Yesha Council of settlements says the number is lower
than the 200 stated by the Civil Administration and that
most of the buildings spotted in the latest aerial survey
were simply never identified before.
The red tape and foot dragging in dismantling outposts is
creating a legal tangle as demolition orders expire,
which will further delay the eventual resumption of
evacuation procedures.
Last
update - 09:32 31/12/2006
Making the law a
laughingstock
By Haaretz Editorial
Virtually not a week goes by without a new revelation,
each more sensational and revolting than the previous
one, about the building spree in West Bank settlements,
in blatant violation of the law and in complete
contradiction to official government policy. All this is
happening with the knowledge of the defense officials
responsible for enforcing the law in the territories, and
with cooperation - by commission or omission - from the
political echelon. The latest discovery does not rely on
external sources such as Peace Now, which specializes in
monitoring and documenting activity in the Land of the
Settlers. Amos Harel's report in Friday's Haaretz about
the 200 mobile homes that have been placed in the West
Bank during the past six months quotes documents prepared
by the Civil Administration - the body responsible for
enforcing planning and construction laws in the area.
In the middle of last week, it was reported that Defense
Minister Amir Peretz had authorized the repopulation of
Maskiot, an abandoned Nahal Brigade outpost. Thirty new
homes will be set up there for evacuees from Gush Katif,
in the Gaza Strip. Maskiot is one of a long list of
communities established beyond the Green Line that have
been completely untouched by the government's commitment
under the road map: to freeze all settlement activities,
including "natural growth." Two weeks ago,
Attorney General Menachem Mazuz notified Peretz that
according to data he received from the Civil
Administration, construction in the illegal outposts is
continuing, including the construction of permanent
structures. Mazuz listed 168 illegal structures that had
been identified in the settlements and outposts over the
past year.
It will soon be two years since the government decided,
in response to a report on the outposts drafted by
attorney Talia Sasson, "to keep its commitment to
dismantle unauthorized outposts set up since March
2001." As a result of this delay, the demolition
orders issued against some of the outposts are close to
expiry, a fact that will make the evacuations more
difficult, if such a day ever comes. According to last
Friday's report, the Israel Defense Forces have not
presented a detailed plan or a timetable for evacuating
the outposts. Instead, for some months now, the defense
minister has been involved in negotiations with the
leaders of the Yesha Council of settlements in an effort
to reach an agreement on the voluntary evacuation of some
outposts and the relocation of the rest to within the
boundaries of the "mother" settlements.
The agreement being formulated with the settlers is
reminiscent of the outposts agreement of October 1999, in
which then prime and defense minister Ehud Barak reached
a deal with the Yesha Council to evacuate a mere 11
outposts (four of which were empty), out of a total of 42
illegal outposts. At the time, Barak was praised for this
"precedent," in which the Yesha Council and
even some of the right's political leaders expressed
their willingness to cooperate with the government in
carrying out a decision to evacuate communities in the
territories. He argued that the agreement with the
"mainstream" settlers would "contribute to
bolstering the rule of law." But according to the
Sasson report, now collecting dust in government
ministries, since that "precedent" was
established, at least 60 more outposts have been set up -
most with government assistance, and all while the army
turned a blind eye. It seems that Prime Minister Ehud
Olmert adheres to that same longstanding tradition of
"bolstering the rule of law."
|