![]() |
||||||
| THE HANDSTAND | JANUARY 2006 |
|||||
![]() european news Dec. 21, 2005 IRISH "ZIONIST SLUR" BLASTED BY ISRAEL IRELAND sparked a diplomatic outcry last night by refusing to back Jewish rights to a homeland. http://www.jewishtelegraph.co.uk/world_1.html An aide to Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern told the Jewish Telegraph that Zionism was a religious issue and refused to take a position on "an Old Testament mandate". The Israeli government hit back, comparing the Republic to the hardline Iranian regime. "I am very sorry that Ireland takes this position because in doing that they support [Iranian President Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad," blasted a senior aide to premier Ariel Sharon. Last month Ahmadinejad told a "World without Zionism" conference that Israel should be "wiped off the map". We are lifting the lid on these explosive comments after Mr Ahern refused to go on the record to denounce claims by former Irish minister Justin Keating that Jews have mounted a "self-serving and untruthful Zionist myth" to lay claim to Israel. John Kennedy, a foreign policy adviser to Mr Ahern, said the Republic would recognise Israel only in its modern form and would not comment on any historical claims on the land. Mr Kennedy said: "Support for Israel isn't premised on Zionism. Our support for Israel is that its effect in being. Zionism may be what brought it to be there, but Zionism is essentially a religious issue - a faith issue. I don't think you're going to get the Taoiseach to take a position on that." He added: "Zionism is not part of relevant official policy here. Even within Judaism you get a division on Zionism. Some people support it and some people have a profoundly held theological basis to reject it. It's a theological issue, we're not going into that." He claimed that Ireland has not been "well served" by Zionism because the migration to Israel in the 1950s and 60s had left behind a "non-viable community". In our series of conversations Mr Kennedy also maintained: "People who say that they have an Old Testament mandate to be there in their historic homeland, we haven't addressed that issue. I haven't seen anyone here taking a policy position on that. Our recognition of Israel and our exchange of ambassadors is all in the modern age, it's in an age where we simply recognise Israel as effect in being, a state of the modern world, one of the community of nations." Mr Kennedy, a civil servant who looks after non-EU foreign policy for the Taoiseach, reiterated their stance: "You can take a view on the State of Israel, quite independently of Zionism." The two countries only established full diplomatic relations in 1975, but the Israeli government says the Irish position, exposed by the Jewish Telegraph, is unacceptable, because it denies the legitimacy of Zionism. "It is not enough," blasted Raanan Gissin, an aide to Mr Sharon. "There is a culture of hatred that says the Jews have no right to live here as an entity. We are here as our birthright not as a conqueror." Mossad head Meir Dagan, who was listening to our interview, pointed out: "We were here 1,600 years before the Arabs." Mr Gissin added: "If you don't support Zionism ipso facto you are actually saying, in the logical progression, we don't support the right of the Jewish people to have a state of their own, in their own ancestral homeland. There's no Zionism if Jews have a state in Alaska or Uganda." As comments by the Iranian president caused growing international interest this week, Mr Gissin further equated them with the Irish position we have uncovered. He stormed: "Ahmadinejad is trying to erase Israel off the map by not recognising that Jews have a birthright." Mr Gissin added: "We are having to teach the same lessons to Ahmadinejad and Ireland. It is not a religious issue and you cannot erase history. The moment you equate Zionism with Judaism you deny any aspect of national sovereignty for the Jewish people. That is the problem with the Arabs, they recognise the entity of Israel, but don't recognise the fact that they have an inherent right to a homeland. Zionism is the national liberation movement of the Jewish people. We are an ancestral tribe who have walked the face of the earth for 4,000 years. We have proof of our existence." The Jewish Telegraph has spent a fortnight trying to obtain comments from Mr Ahern following a series of outrages in against Israel in Ireland this year. In June the Jewish Telegraph witnessed IRA punters targeting Israeli football fans with "Sieg heil" and "Death to Israel" taunts before a World Cup qualifier in Dublin. And veteran politician Justin Keating wrote in last month's Dubliner magazine: "The Zionists have no right in what they call Israel." As we went to press last night, words attributed to the Taoiseach were finally issued, which failed to address the Zionist issue. "Ireland has excellent relations with Israel, at all levels," the Taoiseach maintained. "We are actively committed to supporting the Roadmap for a lasting and peaceful settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict." Britain will be first country to monitor every car journeyhttp://news.independent.co.uk/uk/transport/article334686.ece
Britain is to become the first country in the world where the movements of all vehicles on the roads are recorded. A new national surveillance system will hold the records for at least two years. Using a network of cameras that can automatically read every passing number plate, the plan is to build a huge database of vehicle movements so that the police and security services can analyse any journey a driver has made over several years. The network will incorporate thousands of existing CCTV cameras which are being converted to read number plates automatically night and day to provide 24/7 coverage of all motorways and main roads, as well as towns, cities, ports and petrol-station forecourts. By next March a central database installed alongside the Police National Computer in Hendon, north London, will store the details of 35 million number-plate "reads" per day. These will include time, date and precise location, with camera sites monitored by global positioning satellites. Already there are plans to extend the database by increasing the storage period to five years and by linking thousands of additional cameras so that details of up to 100 million number plates can be fed each day into the central databank.
EU to water down energy saving plans
07.12.2005 - 09:57 CET Ambitious EU plans to reduce energy
consumption in private households and public institutions
have been watered down. Papers
reveal UK's nuclear aid to Israel The Whitehall files not only confirm that Britain was a knowing party to the deal, but also contain subsequent intelligence assessments confirming that the sale of heavy water, which is used to produce plutonium, was crucial to Israel's nuclear weapons programme. It was first revealed earlier this year by BBC Newsnight that sales of heavy water to Israel had secretly taken place in 1958. But Kim Howells, a Foreign Office minister, subsequently claimed that "the UK was not in fact a party to the sale of heavy water to Israel". He sought to blame Norway, saying Britain had merely negotiated "the sale back to Norway of surplus heavy water". But Mr Howells' claims were undermined last night when Newsnight produced documents from the National Archives. A Joint Intelligence Bureau report to spy chiefs on March 27 1961 says: "The main Israeli achievement in the importing line relates to 20 tonnes of heavy water ... which the UK Atomic Energy Authority had contracted to buy from Norway and later found to be surplus to their requirements ... negotiations were undertaken whereby the water ultimately passed into Israeli hands." Contrary to Mr Howells' claim that Britain could not impose safeguards, the papers also show that Britain deliberately agreed not to demand safeguards over the Israeli sale, and officials said it would be "over-zealous" to do so. EU holds back report criticizing Israeli activity in East Jerusalem
Anonymous letter received: Those struggling to come to terms with Germany's absurd "holocaust denial" laws must first understand that they really have nothing to do with the alleged Jewish holocaust and the affirmation or refutation thereof. If that were the case, there would be no reason to use them, since the truth, being self-evident and requiring neither proof nor vast armies of supporting lawyers and judges, would stand on its own merits and win the day. These statutes, which also
require that a defendant charged with such
"crimes" be represented by a lawyer who is
expressly forbidden under the same punitive laws from
introducing in court evidence that would support his
client's arguments, fly in the face of basic human
intelligence and make a mockery of the rule of law in the
so-called age of reason. Anyone who has studied the witchcraft trials in Europe will recall that any lawyer who did too good a job defending a witch would find themselves accused of witchcraft as a result. Is it any wonder there were so many convictions and executions? Yet we know today that (outside of movies) there are no real witches riding broomsticks over the rooftops.
|
||||||