It is at this stage that we witness a spectacular
change in philosophical writing. Forty years on we
have, perhaps, grown accustomed to the writing of
Deleuze, Foucault, Lacan; we have lost the sense of
what an extraordinary rupture with earlier
philosophical styles it represented. All these
thinkers were bent upon finding a style of their own,
inventing a new way of creating prose; they wanted to
be writers. Reading Deleuze or Foucault, one finds
something quite unprecedented at the level of the
sentence, a link between thought and phrasal movement
that is completely original. There is a new,
affirmative rhythm and an astonishing inventiveness
in the formulations. In Derrida there is a patient,
complicated relationship of language to language, as
language works upon itself and thought passes through
that work into words. In Lacan one wrestles with a
dazzlingly complex syntax which resembles nothing so
much as the syntax of Mallarmé, and is therefore
poeticconfessedly so.
There was, then, both a transformation of
philosophical expression and an effort to shift the
frontiers between philosophy and literature. We
should recallanother innovationthat
Sartre was also a novelist and playwright (as am I).
The specificity of this moment in French philosophy
is to play upon several different registers in
language, displacing the borders between philosophy
and literature, between philosophy and drama. One
could even say that one of the goals of French
philosophy has been to construct a new space from
which to write, one where literature and philosophy
would be indistinguishable; a domain which would be
neither specialized philosophy, nor literature as
such, but rather the home of a sort of writing in
which it was no longer possible to disentangle
philosophy from literature. A space, in other words,
where there is no longer a formal differentiation
between concept and life, for the invention of this
writing ultimately consists in giving a new life to
the concept: a literary life. - Alain
Badiou