Earths
Magnetic Field:

Earths
magnetic field has been monitored carefully since the
1830s, when the German polymath Karl Friedrich Gauss
invented a way to measure its intensity. Since then,
the field has decayed at the startling rate of
about 5 percent per century. Has Earths field
been in a spiral of decay for longer than that? Or do
we happen to live in a period when the decline is
particularly striking?
Now
British geophysicist David Gubbins and his colleagues
have an answer from the most unlikely quarter: data
hidden in the logbooks of ships that navigated the
planets oceans in the 16th, 17th, and 18th
centuries. The results have allowed Gubbins to build
a remarkable picture of the behavior of Earths
magnetic field in the centuries before detailed
measurements were possible.
SOLAR
CYCLE

Evidence
is mounting: the next solar cycle is going to be a
big one. Solar cycle 24, due to peak in 2010 or 2011
looks like its going to be one of the most
intense cycles since record-keeping began almost 400
years ago, says solar physicist David Hathaway
of the Marshall Space Flight Center.
Hathaway
explains: When a gust of solar wind hits
Earths magnetic field, the impact causes the
magnetic field to shake. If it shakes hard enough, we
call it a geomagnetic storm. In the extreme,
these storms cause power outages and make compass
needles swing in the wrong direction. Auroras are a
beautiful side-effect.
Hathaway
and Wilson looked at records of geomagnetic activity
stretching back almost 150 years and noticed
something useful:. The amount of geomagnetic
activity now tells us what the solar cycle is going
to be like 6 to 8 years in the future, says
Hathaway. A picture is worth a lot of words:

According
to their analysis, the next Solar Maximum should peak
around 2010 with a sunspot number of 160 plus or
minus 25. This would make it one of the strongest
solar cycles of the past fifty yearswhich is to
say, one of the strongest in recorded history.
Astronomers
have been counting sunspots since the days of
Galileo, watching solar activity rise and fall every
11 years. Curiously, four of the five biggest cycles
on record have come in the past 50 years. Cycle
24 should fit right into that pattern, says
Hathaway.
These
results are just the latest signs pointing to a big
Cycle 24. Most compelling of all, believes Hathaway,
is the work of Mausumi Dikpati and colleagues at the
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in
Boulder, Colorado. They have combined
observations of the suns Great Conveyor
Belt with a sophisticated computer model of the
suns inner dynamo to produce a physics-based
prediction of the next solar cycle. In short,
its going to be intense.
All the notices above are from http://www.brainsturbator.com/index.php/brainsturbation/about/
This website is dedicated to the
expansion of the human mind, in all
directions, in every sense, one brain at a
time. Brainsturbation was founded as a public
outreach program by the Backwoods Institute
of Psychological Technology.
Brainsturbator was created, designed and
coded by Back Brain Media. "Have you
poisoned anyone today? Yeah, me
neither. Is there any way to
rationalize this into the background noise
again? Is there any way to look at this
that doesnt resemble long-term,
mass-scale attempted murder? Or, should
we accept industrial pollution as a
declaration of war, against us and against
future generations? "
|
Brussels climbdown on car
emissions
By George Parker and Andrew
Bounds in Brussels and Hugh,Williamson in Berlin
Published: January 31 2007
02:00 | Last updated: January 31 2007 02:00
Europe's car industry last
night scored a late victory in its battle to scale
back tough new emissions standards, as Brussels
switched the focus of its campaign against climate
change from cleaner engines to greener fuels.
Ambitious new legislation to
force oil companies to blend expensive biofuel into
petrol is expected to be presented today, sending a
message that carmakers will not take all the pain of
reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
The move came as Angela
Merkel, German chancellor, warned Brussels against
setting emissions targets that hit the motor
industry, particularly companies such as
DaimlerChrysler and BMW which produce larger models
with higher emissions.In the face of fierce lobbying
from Ms Merkel and the car sector, Stavros Dimas, the
EU environment commissioner, has scaled back his most
ambitious plans to cut car emissions.
Mr Dimas wanted the car
industry to introduce new technology and cleaner
engines to meet a CO2 emissions
target of 120g per km by 2012; the rules would apply
to any company selling cars in the EU.But Mr Dimas's
allies said last night his bottom line was now a
target of 130g/km for the car industry. Senior
European Commission officials expect a final outcome
to be close to that figure, which would still be
lower than Japan's 138g/km target by 2015.
However, the officials
insist the overall target of 120g/km should remain,
and that other methods - especially the use of
greener fuels - should be used to make up the
shortfall.These also include fitting cars with
indicators to tell drivers when they need to inflate
their tyres or change gear.
An integral part will be the
fuel quality directive, to be adopted by the
Commission today, which has angered the petroleum
industry, which believes Brussels has bowed to Ms
Merkel and the German car industry.It will require
petrol to comprise at least 5 per cent ethanol from
2011, reaching 10 per cent in 2020. Oil companies
must also curb their carbon emissions in extracting
and transporting fuel.The move is estimated to save
500m tonnes of carbon by 2020, almost three times
that expected from including air transport in the
EU's emissions trading scheme.
However, the car industry
continues to battle for more leeway. "Even a
130g limit would be very difficult," said one
representative.The industry looks almost certain to
fail to fulfil its 1999 voluntary agreement to cut
emissions to 140g/km by 2008.
Ms Merkel signalled her
determination to defend -Germany's car industry when
she told a Berlin business conference she "would
certainly block" any binding regulation that did
not -differentiate between car sizes.Ms Merkel said
it was a "regrettable fact" that the
European car industry was not fulfilling the
voluntary agreement to cut emissions, but said a
"general regulation for all [car] sizes"
would be wrong.
The European Commission says
the emissions limits were always intended tobe an
average across the -sector.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007