STOPPRESS STOPPRESS page 2
Do
not Forget USA Police Forces are training Police Forces
in many countries of this world! We do not live in
Seperate worlds !
new york : ORGANIZERS WHO MONITOR POLICE ACTIVITIES
ARRESTED
Malcolm X Grassroots Movement
http://www.mxgm.org/
Three members of the Malcolm X Grassroots Movement,
Lumumba Bandele, Dasaw Floyd, and Djbril Toure were
arrested in the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn
just past midnight this morning. At the time of
their arrest, the three were engaged in the legal
monitoring of police activities as part of the Malcolm X
Grassroots Movement Copwatch Program.
According to Bandele, he Floyd and and Toure were driving
down Greene Avenue when they heard sirens blaring.
They observed an unusual amount of police activity on the
block. They parked their car, turned on their video
camera and approached the scene when a witness to the
events ran past them stating that the police were beating
someone.
Bandele, Toure and Floyd continued to walk toward the
scene when they were stopped by an officer who told them
that they had to leave. Bandele told the officer that
they had a legal right to observe the activities, and
that they were not interfering with the arrest, only
witnessing it. At that point, the officer, who was never
touched by Bandele, Toure or Floyd placed the three under
arrest, charging them
with assault and obstruction of governmental
administration.
*****
The copwatch program was initiated in 2000 as a response
to police brutality in central Brooklyn and has been
involved in a year-long struggle to bring the men who
killed Amadou Diallo to justice. They want to do
something to respond to the ongoing abuse of Black men,
women and children by police.
"They were killing us, savagely beating us and they
still are and they were doing it with apparent
immunity",said Mrs.Bandele. "For Lumumba and I,
as the parents of two small children, this issue had even
greater personal resonance. Every time he or any of us
stand up for some other parent's child, it's as though we
are standing up for our own.
This arrest is outrageous,states Kamau Karl Franklin,
attorney for the three. They were involved in completely
legal activities, and the irony is that their treatment
by police underscores the very need for a program such
Copwatch. We look forward to our day in court because it
will clearly demonstrate the contempt law enforcement too
often feels towards the Black community. Franklin hopes
that this unfortunate event will serve as a catalyst to
make significant changes in who polices Black
communities, and how they police it.
The Malcolm X Grassroots Movement was officially
organized in 1995 as an attempt to raise awareness about
human rights violations in the Black community. It was
part of the coalition of organizations that filed a
lawsuit against the notorious street crimes unit, an
effort which ultimately resulted in that unit's
disbanding.
15 years in gaol
and 15 years waiting for names to be cleared

Gerry Conlon has campaigned for a
public apology
Tony Blair has apologised to two
families who suffered one of the UK's biggest
miscarriages of justice. The prime minister was
commenting on the wrongful jailing of 11 people for IRA
bomb attacks on pubs in Guildford and Woolwich in 1974.
Mr Blair said: "I am very sorry that they were
subject to such an ordeal and injustice."
He made the apology to members of the
Conlon and Maguire families in his private room at
Westminster. In a statement recorded for television, Mr
Blair said the families deserved "to be completely
and publicly exonerated".
The families had hoped the apology
would be made during Prime Minister's Questions in the
House of Commons.
However, one of the so-called Guildford
Four, Gerry Conlon - who was wrongly convicted of
planting the bombs - said the families were delighted
with the apology. He said Mr Blair had spoken with
"such sincerity", adding: "He went beyond
what we thought he would, he took time to listen to
everyone. "Tony Blair has healed rifts, he is
helping to heal wounds. It's a day I never thought would
come." The move followed a huge campaign in Ireland
for a public apology after eleven people were wrongly
convicted of making and planting the IRA bombs which
killed seven people. Mr Blair's official spokesman said
no-one present at the meeting would "ever forget the
strength of feeling of relief that the prime minister's
statement brought to them".
"The people who were still
doubting us should now believe that we were totally
innocent," Mrs. Maguire said. They were all jailed for handling explosives,
based on scientific evidence which was later entirely
discredited.
In October 1989 the Court of Appeal
quashed the sentences of the Guildford Four, and in June
1991 it overturned the sentences on the Maguire Seven. Mr
Conlon's case was highlighted in the Oscar-nominated film
In The Name Of The Father, starring Daniel Day-Lewis.
european salmon import in chaos
Chaos rules as EU curbs salmon imports
08.02.2005 - 10:00 CET | By Lisbeth Kirk
Exports of
Norwegian salmon to the EU market may come to a complete
halt tonight, as new EU anti-import measures have thrown
the fisheries market into chaos, reports the NRK (the
Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation). The Norwegian
Seafood Federation has advised members to halt trucks on
their way to the European markets with salmon and await
further information on how to implement the new
regulation from Brussels.
On Friday (4 February) it was announced by the European
Commission that salmon imports from the worlds
largest salmon producers - Norway, Chile, Iceland and the
Faeroe islands would be restricted.
As of this week, a quota based on
current exports restricts the amount of salmon they are
able to sell into the EU. In addition, a minimum import
price of 2.7 euro per kilo of salmon has been introduced,
which will be raised from 15 April to 2.85 euro per kilo.
The proposals will last until August 2008 unless members
states choose to remove them.
"Imports have not been stopped, but one does not
know at what price the fish is sold and how to operate
this. Customs do not know how to relate to this,
everybody in the business is confused", said Peter
Bamberger from the Association of Danish Fish Processing
Industries and Exporters to Aftenposten.
Scottish and Irish salmon farmers have welcomed the
import restrictions, while the Norwegian and Danish
industries are protesting at what they call EU
protectionism.
The Norwegian foreign minister, Jan Petersen, said the
Norwegian salmon industry was efficient and competitive
and operating without any sort of state subsidies. The
Norwegians are now considering whether to consult the
World Trade Organisation (WTO) over the issue.
IRAQ
What They're Not Telling
You About the "Election"
Dahr Jamail, Electronic
Iraq, 1 February 2005
http://electroniciraq.net/news/1851.shtml
The day of blood and elections has passed, and the
blaring trumpets of corporate media hailing it as a
successful show of "democracy" have subsided to
a dull roar.
After a day which left 50 people dead in Iraq, both
civilians and soldiers, the death toll was hailed as a
figure that was "lower than expected."
Thus...acceptable, by Bush Administration/corporate media
standards. After all, only one of them was an American,
the rest were Iraqis civilians and British soldiers.
The gamble of using the polling day in Iraq to justify
the ongoing failed occupation of Iraq has apparently paid
off, if you watch only mainstream media.
"Higher than expected turnout," US mainstream
television media blared, some citing a figure of 72%,
others 60%.
What they didn't tell you was that this figure was
provided by Farid Ayar, the spokesman for the Independent
Electoral Commission for Iraq (IECI) before the polls had
even closed.
When asked about the accuracy of the estimate of voter
turnout during a press conference, Ayar backtracked on
his earlier figure, saying that a closer estimate was
lower than his initial estimate and would be more like
60% of registered voters.
The IECI spokesman said his previous figure of 72% was
"only guessing" and "was just an
estimate," which was based on "very rough,
word-of mouth estimates gathered informally from the
field. It will take some time for the IECI to issue
accurate figures on turnout."
Referencing both figures, Ayar then added,
"Percentages and numbers come only after counting
and will be announced when it's over ... It's too soon to
say that those were the official numbers."
But this isn't the most important misrepresentation the
mainstream media committed.
What they also didn't tell you was that of those who
voted, whether they be 35% or even 60% of registered
voters, were not voting in support of an ongoing US
occupation of their country.
In fact, they were voting for precisely the opposite
reason. Every Iraqi I have spoken with who voted
explained that they believe the National Assembly which
will be formed soon will signal an end to the occupation.
And they expect the call for a withdrawing of foreign
forces in their country to come sooner rather than later.
This causes one to view the footage of cheering, jubilant
Iraqis in a different light now, doesn't it?
But then, most folks in the US watching CNN, FOX, or any
of the major networks won't see it that way. Instead,
they will hear what Mr. Bush said, "The world is
hearing the voice of freedom from the center of the
Middle East," and take it as fact because most of
the major media outlets aren't scratching beneath film
clips of joyous Iraqi voters over here in the land of
daily chaos and violence, no jobs, no electricity, little
running water and no gasoline (for the Iraqis anyhow).
And Bush is portrayed by the media as the bringer of
democracy to Iraq by the simple fact that this so-called
election took place, botched as it may have been.
Appearances suggest that the majority Shia in Iraq now
finally get their proportional representation in a
"government." Looks good on paper.
But as you continue reading, the seemingly altruistic
reasons for this election as portrayed by the Bush
Administration and trumpeted by most mainstream media are
anything but.
And Iraqis who voted are hearing other trumpets that are
blaring an end to the occupation.
Now the question remains, what happens when the National
Assembly is formed and over 100,000 US soldiers remain on
the ground in Iraq with the Bush Administration
continuing in its refusal to provide a timetable for
their removal?
What happens when Iraqis see that while there are already
four permanent US military bases in their country, rather
than beginning to disassemble them, more bases are being
constructed, as they are, by Cheney's old company
Halliburton, right now?
Antonia Juhasz, a Foreign Policy in
Focus scholar, authored a piece just
before the "election" that sheds light on a
topic that has lost attention amidst the recent fanfare
concerning the polls in Iraq.
Oil.
I think it's worth including much of her story here, as
it fits well with today's topic of things most folks
aren't being told by the bringers of democracy to the
heart of the Middle East.
On Dec. 22, 2004, Iraqi
Finance Minister Abdel Mahdi told a handful of
reporters and industry insiders at the National Press
Club in Washington, D.C. that Iraq wants to issue a
new oil law that would open Iraq's national oil
company to private foreign investment. As Mahdi
explained: "So I think this is very promising to
the American investors and to American enterprise,
certainly to oil companies." In other words,
Mahdi is proposing to privatize Iraq's oil and put it
into American corporate hands.
According to the finance minister, foreigners would
gain access both to "downstream" and
"maybe even upstream" oil investment. This
means foreigners can sell Iraqi oil and own it under
the ground the very thing for which many argue
the U.S. went to war in the first place.
As Vice President Dick Cheney's Defense Policy
Guidance report explained back in 1992, "Our
overall objective is to remain the predominant
outside power in the [Middle East] region and
preserve U.S. and Western access to the region's
oil."
While few in the American media
other than Emad Mckay of Inter Press Service reported
on or even attended Mahdi's press
conference, the announcement was made with U.S.
Undersecretary of State Alan Larson at Mahdi's side.
It was intended to send a message but to whom?
It turns out that Abdel Mahdi is running in the Jan.
30 elections on the ticket of the Supreme Council for
the Islamic Revolution (SCIR), the leading Shiite
political party. While announcing the selling-off of
the resource which provides 95 percent of all Iraqi
revenue may not garner Mahdi many Iraqi votes, but it
will unquestionably win him tremendous support from
the U.S. government and U.S. corporations.
Mahdi's SCIR is far and away the front-runner in the
upcoming elections, particularly as it becomes
increasingly less possible for Sunnis to vote because
the regions where they live are spiraling into deadly
chaos. If Bush were to suggest to Iraq's Interim
Prime Minister Iyad Allawi that elections should be
called off, Mahdi and the SCIR's ultimate chances of
victory will likely decline.
I'll add that the list of political parties Mahdi's SCIR
belongs to, The United Iraqi Alliance (UIA), includes the
Iraqi National Council, which is led by an old friend of
the Bush Administration who provided the faulty
information they needed to justify the illegal invasion
of Iraq, none other than Ahmed Chalabi.
It should also be noted that interim Prime Minister Iyad
Allawi also fed the Bush Administration cooked
information used to justify the invasion, but he heads a
different Shia list which will most likely be getting
nearly as many votes as the UIA list.
And The UIA has the blessing of Iranian born revered
Shiite cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. Sistani
issued a fatwa which instructed his huge number of
followers to vote in the election, or they would risk
going to hell.
Thus, one might argue
that the Bush administration has made a deal with the
SCIR: Iraq's oil for guaranteed political power. The
Americans are able to put forward such a bargain
because Bush still holds the strings in Iraq.
Regardless of what happens in the elections, for at
least the next year during which the newly elected
National Assembly writes a constitution and Iraqis
vote for a new government, the Bush administration is
going to control the largest pot of money available
in Iraq (the $24 billion in U.S. taxpayer money
allocated for the reconstruction), the largest
military and the rules governing Iraq's economy. Both
the money and the rules will, in turn, be overseen by
U.S.-appointed auditors and inspector generals who
sit in every Iraqi ministry with five-year terms and
sweeping authority over contracts and regulations.
However, the one thing which the administration has
not been unable to confer upon itself is guaranteed
access to Iraqi oil that is, until now.
And there is so much more they are not telling you. Just
like the Iraqis who voted, believing they did so to bring
an end to the occupation of their country.
Related Links
BY TOPIC: Iraqi Elections (30th January
2005)
(c)2004, 2005 Dahr Jamail. More
writing, photos and commentary at dahrjamailiraq.com. All images and text are protected
by United States and international copyright law. If you
would like to reprint Dahr's Dispatches on the web, you
need to include this copyright notice and a prominent
link to the DahrJamailIraq.com website. Any other use of
images and text including, but not limited to,
reproduction, use on another website, copying and
printing requires the permission of Dahr Jamail.
Page last updated: 1 February 2005, 12:32
|