
Water, Sickness And A
Brewing Storm
By Dahr Jamail
1-27-4
Bechtel reneges on
contractual obligations
- Our trip was comprised of
a frenetic tour, stopping by villages
both near and inside the city limits of
Hilla, Najaf, and Diwaniya. Hilla, right
near Babylon, has a water treatment plant
and distribution center that is managed
by Salmam Hassan Kadel, who is also the
Chief Engineer. The wastewater project
here, like in Najaf and Diwaniya, is
specifically named on Bechtel's contract as one that they are
responsible for rehabilitating.
-
- Mr. Kadel informed me that
he has received help from UNICEF, Red
Cross and several others. He told me that
even during the war they had running
water in every house, and just had the
normal problems of needing to replace old
pipes and pumps. Now, they are supplying
only 50% of the water they need for the
people of Hilla. The villages have no
water, and they don't have the pipes they
need to get the work done.
-
- And they
have had no contact from Bechtel, or a subcontractor he said. He
tells of massive numbers of people with
cholera, diarrhea, nausea, and kidney
stones.
-
- Mr. Kadel says,Bechtel is spending all of their money
without any studies. We give our NGO's
all of our information before they do the
work, and they know what to do. Bechtel is painting buildings, but this doesn't give clean
water to the people who have died from
drinking contaminated water. We ask of
them that instead of painting buildings,
they give us one water pump and we'll use
it to give water service to more people.
We have had no change since the
Americanís came here. We know Bechtel is wasting money, but we can't prove it.
-
- Just outside of Hilla I
speak with several men of a small
village. It's the usual story-no running
water, maybe 2-4 hours of electricity per
day to run their feeble pumps to pull in
contaminated water for them to use.
-
- An old man, Hussin Hamsa
Nagem, tells me, 'This is just like
Saddam's time. In fact, it is worse. We
have less water now than before. We are
all sick with stomach problems and kidney
stones. Our
crops are dying.
-
- At another small village
between Hilla and Najaf, 1500 people are drinking
water from a dirty stream which slowly
trickles near the homes. Everyone has dysentery, many
with kidney stones, a huge number with
cholera. One of the men, holding a sick
child, tells me, ět was much better
before the invasion. We had 24 hours
running water then. Now we are drinking
this garbage because it is all we have.
-
- A little further down the
road at a village of 6000 homes called Abu Hidari, it is more
of the same. Here, Saddam
was rebuilding the pipes, but this ceased during the
invasion and has yet to be resumed. The women are carrying water
from a nearby dirty creek into their
homes, because again, they have no other
option.
-
- After a night in Najaf,
the next morning finds me at yet another
village on the outskirts of Najaf, which
falls under the responsibility of Najaf's
water center. Here
the people had been pro-active in
collecting funds from each house to
install new pipes. But due to lack
of electricity and lack of water from the Najaf water treatment
center, they are suffering.
-
- A large hole is dug into
the ground where they tapped into already
existing pipes to siphon water. It fills
the dirty hole in the night, when water
is collected. This morning, children
stand around it as women collect what
little bit of dirty water which stands in
the bottom of the hole.
-
- Dysentary, cholera,
nausea, diarrhea, kidney stones everyone
is suffering from some water-born illness
here, like the rest. 8 children from the
village have been killed when attempting
to cross the busy highway to a nearby
factory in order to retrieve clean water.
-
- Women are walking 1 km
down to a stream, which dries up in the
summer, to collect water for their homes.
In the same stream other people are
washing their dishes and doing laundry. I
am told that many children from the
village have drowned in this stream while
collecting water.
-
- After translating for
upwards of several hundred men from at
least 10 different villages in this
region south of Baghdad, at one point
Hamoudi, with a tired and sad look on his
face, said,
-
- I cannot do this work.
They are desperate. They are asking me to
help, and I can do nothing for these
people. I'm very tired.
-
- Mr. Mehdi is an engineer
and Assistant Manager at the Najaf water
distribution center. With help from Red
Cross and the Spanish Army, they are
doing some of the rebuilding on their
own. He tells me
Bechtel has begun working on the Arzaga
Water Project to help bring water into
the city center of Najaf. He says that
Bechtel started one month ago; painting
buildings, cleaning and repairing storage
tanks and repairing and replacing sand
filters.
-
- This is the only
project he knows of that Bechtel has been
working on in Najaf.
-
- There has been no work on desalinization, which is critical in this
area, or other purification processes.
-
- He states, Bechtel is repairing some
water facilities, but not improving the
electricity any, which is their
responsibility.
Their work has not produced any more
clean water than what we already had.
Bechtel has not spoken with us, or
promised us to do anything else.
-
- .I
ask him if he thinks Bechtel can meet
their contractual obligation of restoring
potable water supply in all of the urban
centers of Iraq by April 17th, and he
laughs.
-
- I ask him, "How
successful has Bechtel been in restoring
electrical service to your water facility
which depends on electricity to
operate?" He tells me at least 30%
of Najaf doesn't have clean water simply
because of lack of electricity.
-
- In Diwaniya, and each of
the 5 other villages I visited the story
is the same. Change the names of the
people and the names of the city/village,
and we find cholera, dysentery, diarrhea,
nausea, less than 8 hours of electricity
per day, contaminated water (or no
water), and everyone is suffering.
-
- All of these people are
Shiíite Muslims, those the US hopes to
gain the support of. Those who have been
promised the most, and had the most hope
for a better life now that they are no
longer living in the shadow of Saddam
Hussein. These are the people who
suffered the most from his regime.
-
- I am here to state,
unequivocally, that 100% of the people I
spoke with in this area south of Baghdad
have stated that their living conditions
are worse now than when Saddam was in
power.
-
- Mr. Hassan Mehdi Mohammed
lives in a small village with his wife
and 8 children, about an hours drive
south of Baghdad. His village has 80%
unemployment. He tells me,
-
- "The Americanís have
come and taken everything but have given
us nothing. It is worse than before. We
were hoping it would be better than
before, but now it is worse. The IGC has
forgotten to take care of the Iraqi
people."
-
- I ask him what he thinks
needs to occur to improve their
situation.
-
- "First, we need
security. But the Americanís aren't even
safe themselves. They are killed
everyday. We like to hear that companies
are coming here and we can work for them,
but the IGC is always disagreeing amongst
themselves. They have done nothing to
help. We need free elections, this would
be good for the people and give them
hope. But we know Mr. Bremer will cheat
us with those."
-
- I ask him what he thinks
will happen here in the near future.
-
- "If we donít get our
elections, there will be a bloody war. I
fear a civilian war."
-
- More of his children come
sit with us as we drink chai and talk. He
continues,
-
- "I think the
Americanís came here because they want
something, not just because they love the
Iraqi people. If they really came to
help, then they should leave quickly. Now
we are waiting for the next 6 months. The
longer we wait, the more we see their
promises are not being kept."
-
- He takes a sip of chai,
thinks for a moment, and says,
-
- "No occupation ever
makes things good for the people. All the
people in the world must know the
Americanís are here just to help Mr.
Bush win this next election. The same
people who benefited under Saddam are
benefiting more now. And the same people
who suffered under Saddam, are suffering
even more now."
-
- His brother-in-law, Saduk
al Abid, who has joined the discussion
says,
-
- "Iraqi people now
have no trust in the Americanís or the
IGC. They have given us one empty promise
after another. We can feel the emptiness
of all of their promises now."
-
- Both of these men fought
in the Intifada against Saddam Hussein in
1991. Now they both lack jobs and are
suffering worse than before.

-
- Mr. Abid says,
"During Saddamís time we could at
least find a job and bring home some
money. Now, we cannot."
-
- We drive the rest of the
way back to Baghdad and listen to the
news of a bus being exploded by an IED on
the Dora Highway, and three US soldiers
missing near Mosul. More Iraqi Police are
killed in this incident as well.
-
- Last night we hear a
couple of loud explosions, then listen to
the warning sirens wailing from the CPA
headquarters in Baghdad as it was once
again attacked with rockets. Several
Bradley fighting vehicles rumble down the
street under my window, and helicopters
fly across Baghdad in different
directions
|
Making the blooms
desert
By Jessica McCallin
Many people wonder why Israel won't give back the
occupied territories in return for peace. One reason is
that more than half of Israel's water supplies now come
from the Mountain Aquifer and
Jordan river basin, which are situated deep within them
Jericho used to be one of Palestine's prime agricultural
spots. An abundance of springs made the fertile land
surrounding the ancient town famous for its oranges,
bananas and strawberries.
Now, all that is changing. Fields are drying up, crops
are dying and farmers are being put out of work. The
reason is simple: water. Israeli settlements get priority
access to water and as they expand and new ones are
built, the amount of water available to Palestinians
decreases. Because of its strategic location between
Jerusalem and Jordan, the Jericho region has been
particularly affected.
It helps Israel divide the north and south of the West
Bank from each other, and creates "facts on the
ground" that preclude the establishment of a viable
Palestinian state. But its water crises are repeated
across the Palestinian Territories.
Since seizing the West Bank in 1967, Israel has illegally
exploited the Mountain Aquifer and Jordan river basin.
Many historians believe this has been the underlying
reason for the invasion and occupation of the West Bank.
One of the first military orders of the occupation was
the confiscation of almost all West Bank wells. Since
then, drilling for new wells has been banned and quotas
have been imposed on the existing ones. The amount of
water allocated to Palestinians has been capped at 1967
levels, despite the subsequent growth in population.
Water has always been a source of conflict in the Middle
East. Israeli attempts to divert water from the
Jordan-Yarmouk river basin into the Negev were a key
source of the 1967 war. And the Golan Heights, which
Israel still refuses to give back to Syria, are also
water rich.
Today, Israel uses 79% of the Mountain Aquifer and all of
the Jordan River Basin -- bar a small quantity that it
sells to Palestinians in Gaza. The result is apartheid in
all but name.
Israelis get 350 litres of water per person per day,
Palestinians get just 70 litres. The minimal quantity of
water recommended by the World Health Organisation is 100
litres.
When supplies run low during the summer months, the
Israeli water company, Mekorot, simply shuts off the
valves that supply Palestinian towns. This means settlers
get their swimming pools topped up while Palestinian
villages a few miles away run out of drinking water.
When tensions are high -- as they are now -- the
situation becomes unbearable, especially for the 25 per
cent of Palestinian villages that were never connected to
a water supply.
Since the start of the Intifada, Israel has made it
almost impossible for water tankers to enter Palestinian
areas -- or for villagers to get to nearby wells.
B'Tselem, the Israeli human rights group says Israeli
soldiers sometimes beat and humiliate tanker drivers or
deliberately spill their water.
Yunis Muhammed 'Abd Tim Jabarin, a father of eight from a
village in southern Hebron described how, in hot weather,
"often we don't have water for ten to twenty days.
In such situations, my wife and daughters ask the
neighbours for water, but they can only give enough for
drinking and cooking. As for washing, we have got used to
showering once every five to seven days. The situation is
intolerable, especially in the summer."
But towns with connections also face problems, according
to Ayman Rabi, of the Palestinian Hydrological Group.
"Settlers attack the Palestinians' water supply,
severing pipes and switching off valves," he said.
"They dump untreated sewage on Palestinian land,
polluting wells and aquifers." The Israeli army has
also routinely destroyed water supplies, an activity
defined as a war crime.
Part of the problem is that the Oslo peace process tried
to institutionalise Israel's theft of Palestinian water,
and its discriminatory allocation system. Yehezkel Lein
of B'Tselem said, "Comments from Israeli offices
give the impression that Oslo transferred responsibility
(for water supplies) to the Palestinian Authority."
"However, Israel continues to maintain almost total
control over water in the occupied territories. Every new
project, from drilling a well to laying pipes or building
a reservoir, requires Israel's consent."
Israeli reluctance to relinquish control of West Bank
water is not surprising. More than a quarter of its water
supplies now come from the West Bank aquifer -- and over
a third comes from the Jordan Basin. But it has no legal
right to the water -- and it's not using it sustainably.
Private swimming pools and green lawns are not a priority
in desert areas.
Over-extraction from the Jordan river is the main reason
the river flow has dropped nearly 90 per cent in the last
50 years. It is now just a small stream, too small to
replenish the Dead Sea, which is also fast disappearing.
Many hydrologists predict that it won't exist in 50
years. So how will the population of Israel and Palestine
-- predicted to double in 25 years -- survive?
Israel likes to boast about how it made the desert bloom,
how the original inhabitants of Palestine were
"wasting" the land. But far from wasting the
land, the Arabs lived within its constraints, in harmony
with it. By making parts of its desert bloom, Israel has
simply turned parts of Arab land into desert, unable to
provide its inhabitants with water, the most fundamental
pre-requisite for human life.
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=
news_international&Number=110354&view=collapsed&sb=6&o=31&part=
"Strive as in a race to achieve the
goal of excellence in all that you do."
For real insights visit: http://www.geocities.com/mewatch99/
Regards,
Nashid
| Activists
Launch Global Offensive Against Water-Guzzling
Multinational Companies |
| by Rahul
Kumar |
| |
| NEW DELHI -
The People's
World Water Forum (PWWF) has
launched a global campaign against multinationals
Coca Cola and Suez Degremont - and plans to drum
up popular support against water privatization at
the World Social Forum starting in India's
financial capital, Mumbai, Friday. Launching
the movement in the Indian capital New Delhi,
Vandana Shiva of the NGO, Research Foundation for
Science, Technology and Ecology alleged,
"These two companies are the prime
exploiters of global water resources. Suez leads
in privatization of water in most countries and
Coca Cola leads in having conflicts with local
people over groundwater mining."
PWWF
participants, comprising nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs) from more than 60 countries,
have decided to spread the word against water
privatization and educate people on water rights
on their close to 1,500 kilometer train journey
from New Delhi to Mumbai.
Declared
Shiva, "We will take our concerns on
water-related issues to those organizations,
which are not working on them. We plan to hold
public hearings, testimonies and workshops."
NGOs have
decided to give a push to campaigns against
corporate groundwater extraction which have
devastated local ecology, indigenous communities
and economies, in Plachimada in south India,
Varanasi in north India and Potisi in Chile .
The Forum
also pledged support to local people and
communities in their battled for water resources.
The communities will be given support on issues
like relocation of people due to river linking,
privatization of water, groundwater mining by
multinational companies and cutting off water
supply to the poor.
The movement
will also lobby with the United Nations (UN) to
ensure water is included as a fundamental right
in its International Covenant of Ecological,
Social and Cultural Rights.

Tony Clarke
from the Polaris Institute, Canada added that,
"Apart from the UN, we will also lobby with
national governments to accept and give water the
status of a human right. Water is a public good
that needs to be publicly financed and not given
in private hands."
PWWF has
decided to educate people against the ill effects
of privatization of water. Activists said most
water projects are being executed with public
money, but there is a popular misconception that
the projects are funded by multinational
companies (MNCs) and the private sector.
The Forum
plans to act as a pressure group as well.
As Clarke
puts it, "The World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund are giving a big push
to privatization of water. But the money with the
World Bank is public money, so it should be used
for public work. People are not aware of this. We
want to pressure the Bank into supporting public
water utilities and respecting the human right to
water."
The alliance
also wants governments to come clean on their
projects with MNCs. As Shiva put it, "The
Delhi government has not made public its pact
with the Suez company for a water treatment plant
in north-east Delhi. We want to see it because
such agreements always go against the interests
of the poor."
Agreed
President of the Danielle Mitterrand Foundation,
Danielle Mitterrand, "Privatization of water
is against the interests of people. Governments
should think of alternative methods of water
distribution, instead of handing over water
resources to private companies."
Danielle, the
wife of late French President Francois
Mitterrand, remains involved in the global
movement against water privatization for the last
four years. She said mayors of many cities in
France have created an association Aqua Revolte -
to take back water supply from private companies.
Most NGOs at
the global water meet were also opposed to
massive river linking projects, on the grounds
that river diversion projects displace people,
upset ecosystems and constitute anti-democratic
water use and management.
Clarke said
river diversion schemes are spreading like an
epidemic. "These are unsustainable, outmoded
and obsolete, but are being resorted to by the
Indian, Chinese, Canadian, Spanish and even
African governments."
Niel
Robinson, a minority activist from the US said
private water companies in the US have cut off
the supply of poor people who were unable to pay
for water. Minorities, women-headed households
and the poor are the worst affected.
Shiva added
that the PWWF will also rally pilgrims for the
cause of India's sacred river Ganges. She said,
"The holy dip in which pilgrims from all
over India take a bath in the Ganges, has begun.
But people have'nt been told water will be
diverted because it has been privatised. This
will hurt people's religious beliefs."
© Copyright
2004 OneWorld.net
Making the
blooms desert
By Jessica McCallin
Many people wonder why Israel won't give back the
occupied territories in return for peace. One
reason is that more than half of Israel's water
supplies now come from the Mountain Aquifer and
Jordan river basin, which are situated deep
within them
Jericho used to be one of Palestine's prime
agricultural spots. An abundance of springs made
the fertile land surrounding the ancient town
famous for its oranges, bananas and strawberries.
Now, all that is changing. Fields are drying up,
crops are dying and farmers are being put out of
work. The reason is simple: water. Israeli
settlements get priority access to water and as
they expand and new ones are built, the amount of
water available to Palestinians decreases.
Because of its strategic location between
Jerusalem and Jordan, the Jericho region has been
particularly affected.
It helps Israel divide the north and south of the
West Bank from each other, and creates
"facts on the ground" that preclude the
establishment of a viable Palestinian state. But
its water crises are repeated across the
Palestinian Territories.
Since seizing the West Bank in 1967, Israel has
illegally exploited the Mountain Aquifer and
Jordan river basin. Many historians believe this
has been the underlying reason for the invasion
and occupation of the West Bank.
One of the first military orders of the
occupation was the confiscation of almost all
West Bank wells. Since then, drilling for new
wells has been banned and quotas have been
imposed on the existing ones. The amount of water
allocated to Palestinians has been capped at 1967
levels, despite the subsequent growth in
population.
Water has always been a source of conflict in the
Middle East. Israeli attempts to divert water
from the Jordan-Yarmouk river basin into the
Negev were a key source of the 1967 war. And the
Golan Heights, which Israel still refuses to give
back to Syria, are also water rich.
Today, Israel uses 79% of the Mountain Aquifer
and all of the Jordan River Basin -- bar a small
quantity that it sells to Palestinians in Gaza.
The result is apartheid in all but name.
Israelis get 350 litres of water per person per
day, Palestinians get just 70 litres. The minimal
quantity of water recommended by the World Health
Organisation is 100 litres.
When supplies run low during the summer months,
the Israeli water company, Mekorot, simply shuts
off the valves that supply Palestinian towns.
This means settlers get their swimming pools
topped up while Palestinian villages a few miles
away run out of drinking water.
When tensions are high -- as they are now -- the
situation becomes unbearable, especially for the
25 per cent of Palestinian villages that were
never connected to a water supply.
Since the start of the Intifada, Israel has made
it almost impossible for water tankers to enter
Palestinian areas -- or for villagers to get to
nearby wells. B'Tselem, the Israeli human rights
group says Israeli soldiers sometimes beat and
humiliate tanker drivers or deliberately spill
their water.
Yunis Muhammed 'Abd Tim Jabarin, a father of
eight from a village in southern Hebron described
how, in hot weather, "often we don't have
water for ten to twenty days. In such situations,
my wife and daughters ask the neighbours for
water, but they can only give enough for drinking
and cooking. As for washing, we have got used to
showering once every five to seven days. The
situation is intolerable, especially in the
summer."
But towns with connections also face problems,
according to Ayman Rabi, of the Palestinian
Hydrological Group. "Settlers attack the
Palestinians' water supply, severing pipes and
switching off valves," he said. "They
dump untreated sewage on Palestinian land,
polluting wells and aquifers." The Israeli
army has also routinely destroyed water supplies,
an activity defined as a war crime.
Part of the problem is that the Oslo peace
process tried to institutionalise Israel's theft
of Palestinian water, and its discriminatory
allocation system. Yehezkel Lein of B'Tselem
said, "Comments from Israeli offices give
the impression that Oslo transferred
responsibility (for water supplies) to the
Palestinian Authority."
"However, Israel continues to maintain
almost total control over water in the occupied
territories. Every new project, from drilling a
well to laying pipes or building a reservoir,
requires Israel's consent."
Israeli reluctance to relinquish control of West
Bank water is not surprising. More than a quarter
of its water supplies now come from the West Bank
aquifer -- and over a third comes from the Jordan
Basin. But it has no legal right to the water --
and it's not using it sustainably. Private
swimming pools and green lawns are not a priority
in desert areas.
Over-extraction from the Jordan river is the main
reason the river flow has dropped nearly 90 per
cent in the last 50 years. It is now just a small
stream, too small to replenish the Dead Sea,
which is also fast disappearing. Many
hydrologists predict that it won't exist in 50
years. So how will the population of Israel and
Palestine -- predicted to double in 25 years --
survive?
Israel likes to boast about how it made the
desert bloom, how the original inhabitants of
Palestine were "wasting" the land. But
far from wasting the land, the Arabs lived within
its constraints, in harmony with it. By making
parts of its desert bloom, Israel has simply
turned parts of Arab land into desert, unable to
provide its inhabitants with water, the most
fundamental pre-requisite for human life.
http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=
news_international&Number=110354&view=collapsed&sb=6&o=31&part=
"Strive as in a race to achieve the
goal of excellence in all that you
do."
For real insights visit:
http://www.geocities.com/mewatch99/
Regards,
Nashid
-
|
|