Israelis Caught Red
Handed Planning 'Arab' Terrorism
The Voice of the White House
8-12-6
WASHINGTON, DC -- "Here, as promised, is an
interesting conversation that
somehow accidentally got intercepted and transcribed.
There are lots more
where this came from!"
Transcription of telephone
conversation on August 3, 2006
from Israeli Embassy, Washington D.C. Telephone Number
(202) 364-5582.
to unidentified individual at AIPAC , Washington D.C.,
Telephone Number
(202) 639-5201
Commenced 1821 hrs, concluded 1826 hrs.
Speaker A: Reuven Azar - Counselor for Political Affairs,
Embassy of
Israel
Speaker B: Unidentified individual located at AIPAC
headquarters
A. Well, things are going as well as expected, better
perhaps than
expected. There is military progress there (Lebanon) and
we have
wonderful cooperation here.
B. For sure, but don't forget the dangers in having too
much cooperation.
All right for this moment but in the long run, this can
certainly
backfire on us. You know, we are seen as being too much
influential with
the Bush people.
A. I wouldn't worry too much about that. The media is
certainly not to
worry about and most Americans really do not care about
things there
(Lebanon) The main point is that by the time the U.S.
makes itself felt
at the UN, we will have accomplished our goals and
established the buffer
we need.
B. Absolutely butthere is still the future to think
about.
A. Who cares? Once we establish the buffer, the rest is
just shit. It
will all be hidden soon in the coming press reports of
Arab 'attacks' on
the U.S. This is for the voting in November. You know,
'many Arab groups
will for sure attack American targets.' They (the U.S.
Government) will
choose so-called target areas where they need the most
support. We don't
need to worry about Miami, Skokie or Beverly Hills after
all. (Laughter)
and this is a little crude but the public here is
terribly stupid and the
warning color days worked before, didn't
they?
B. Yes, but there are second thoughts on all of that. If
you go to the
well too often, there are problems. People lose interest.
A. The British are being such swine about this, aren't
they? They are
causing trouble about the bombs these days.
B. Just a few troublemakers. The press here does not
cover that and who
reads the foreign media? Most Americans can't read
anyway. But there is
danger that the U.N. might be motivated to move a peace
keeping force
into Lebanon and this might negate our purposes.
Hesbollah must be
utterly wiped out and Syria must be made to realizewith
force if
necessarythat it cannot supply the terrorists with more
Iranian rockets.
Maybe an accidental airstrike on Syrian military units
could say to them
to mind their own business. We have done this before.
A. It is too bad that we cannot teach Tehran a lesson.
The ultimate goal
would be to have America attack Iran but I am afraid the
American
military is dead set against this
B. They are all Jew-haters up there.
A. For sure, but we know that Americans can bomb the shit
out of Tehran
and hopefully kill off a number of the militants,
probably disrupt their
atomic program and teach all of the area that the U.S.
means business. We
support them, they support us. But they cannot send in
ground troops and
if we did that, our losses would not be borne at home. As
it is, there
are the usual malcontents bleating about the Lebanon
business.
B. They are just afraid they will get a rocket on their
house and there
are the same ones here. The Lieberman business is not
that good, after
all. Yes, of course he is a liberal Democrat but his
support of us is too
obvious. He could be a little critical too. We see the
Bush people doing
this, just to keep the people quiet. Yes, they say, see,
we too are
actually critical of Israel.
A. But not too critical, right?
B. No, never that. Too many pictures of dead
jerks for example. We need
to see more pictures of grieving Israelis, mourning lost
sons and
children. Can't we get more of those? Fuck the Arabs.
A. I feel sorry for the American media. Their instincts
are to defend
dead Arab children
B. But nits make lice, don't they? Who mourns dead
Israeli children?
A. I'm sure there would be more on this but not enough
children are dead.
B. Not yet, anyway. But if they rocket Tel
Aviv
A. Well, then, for sure.
B. We should have pictures all ready if that happens. Do
you think it
will?
A. Tehran directs that part of the business. We don't
have as much inside
gen on them there
B. The fucking Russians are on their side.
A. We have always had trouble with those Slavic
pricks. First weapons
B. The Chinese assholes also do this, don't forget.
A. No one around here will forget that, be assured. The
time will come
when we get them too. Say we cut off their oil from the
Gulf? What then?
They will dance to our tunes then, not Tehran's.
B. If we had oil
A. But we do not. The filthy Putin has the oil. They
should get rid of
him while they are at it. Our people almost had it but he
forced them
out.
B. They can always come back. The people here would
really support this.
We put our people back in after we get rid of Putin and
then a guaranteed
flow of oil to America.
A. And Russia is off the chessboard too.
B. They all want that badly here, too. Cheney is
the strongest supporter
of cutting the nuts off of
RussiA.
The military here are
against fishing in troubled waters.
A. They can't be replaced, Bush can't sack them all.
B. Set an example. Sack a few more of the assholes
and the rest will
shut up. They always do. So, send me your latest list and
I'll see what I
can do here.
A. Send someone to pick it up. The mail here is awful. It
will take a
week if some black doesn't
steal it, throw it away or wipe his ass
with it.
B. Tomorrow for sure.
A. OK. And one other
matter. We feel very strongly that if the
current people get kicked out in November, as it looks
like they might,
we owe them to help them stay right where they are. It
has taken a long
time and much money to get all the ducks lined up and we
don't want to
have to start in again. We can generally rely on sympathy
from the
Democrats but they will not support any more military
ventures over
there. That's for sure.
B. Then what do you suggest?
A. The terrorism card works wonders. We were going to
release a statement
that Arabs were going to attack an El Al plane on
takeoff, with rockets.
A. Probably leftovers from the CIA businesses in
Afghanistan.
A. Let's not get into that now. But this scare would only
affect flights
to Israel and we don't think it would have any impact on
the election.
B. Well then, why not have these attacks aimed at
American aircraft?
Where would they attack from?
A. Say at the perimeter fence lines at airports. Or
better still, why not
a plan cooked up to smuggle explosives on board
transatlantic flights to
or from America? Something clever that will catch the
public imagination.
B. That stupid bomb in the shoe routine?
A. Don't knock it. It worked, didn't it? We can always
find some suckers
with a bent to this we can fill up with real enthusiasm
and then turn
them in, complete with plans. They actually believe they
are going to
paradise and fuck virgins and we have another propaganda
coup. Let's give
this some effort. You know, a terrified public will not
want to change
horses in mid stream. So far, the Rove people have a good
line: If you're
against the Republicans, you're encouraging the evil
terrorists sthick.
B. Well, they did that with the alert warnings and it
workedmore or less.
A. Face it, they aren't too bright here. They ran it into
the ground, had
to fire Ridge and Ashcroft, one of our very best friends
ever, and put
those things on ice. They need to discover a huge plot
but in America
A. You know, as you said, infiltrate a group of crazies,
plant things on
them, call the FBI
B. Oh, they do that themselves. That business in Florida
was pathetic
A. But it worked, didn't it?
B. For about ten minutes at six o'clock for about three
days.
A. Well, think about it and get back to me.
B. Right.
A. What's the situation with your two people? Are they
going to be tried
or not?
B. Probably not, as far as the Bush people are concerned.
But it is up to
the courts and we are very careful not to fuck with
them. They are
expected to have the charges thrown out soon
A. Well, I'll pray for them. I have to go now so I'll get
back to you
later. Don't forget to send someone for the list
B. OK.
(Conversation terminated)
This is just the tip of a very large iceberg. Other
inside information
will be published in upcoming editions. On Monday, August
14, I will put
up a complete listing of all members of Congress who have
received money
from AIPAC, state by state, amount by amount.
Dear old crazy, and defeated, Lieberman, shrieking with
rage at seeing
all his extra income flowing down the drain, has received
over $227,758
so far from AIPAC . Tell me, children, what did he do for
all that money?
There are many more names and amounts to entertain you as
well as to give
you a concrete guide as to your voting in November next.
As far as the recent stories about "terrorist
attacks" coming from
England, don't believe them. It is well known around the
White House that
this invented story is designed to offset the crushing
defeat of the
Administration's darling liberal, Lieberman. This theme,
by the way,
according to position papers circulating here, is the
main theme of the
November elections. The thesis? Why the Iron Trio of
Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld
have protected, and will continue to protect, innocent
America from evil
terrorist threats.
Of course, if you vote Democratic, all bets are off and
armies of rabid
Muslim (read non Christian) fascists will at once invade
America, to
rape, loot and pillage while setting off bombs in the Des
Moines Public
Library. Please note that in spite of all the shit the
Bush people have
spread around about "proctecting America" there
has not been one proven
incident of any real terrorist group caught or no attack
thwarted. The
WMD lies were the father and the "terrorist
threats" and the illegitimate
child of this corrupt and dangerous gang."
|