Hell
Henry See
18 July 2006
Signs of the Times
What do you do when the entire world is siding with
murder? When the life of one Israeli soldier is worth
more than the lives of an entire civilian population?
Make that two civilian populations - Gaza and Lebanon.
What do you do when the deliberate gunning down and
bombing of villagers evacuating their town calls forth no
shouts of protest, when the premeditated massacre of
women and children is called "defence"?
Israel is given free reign to kill as many Arabs as its
blood lust demands while the world looks on in silence,
or worse, by suggesting those crazed Arab terrorists
should calm down, implying "they deserve it".
Israeli psychopath in chief Olmert
lets it be known in no uncertain terms that the
bombing of Lebanon will continue until the two captured
Israeli soldiers are returned. The headlines in the west
read
"Israeli
foreign minister lays out conditions for ceasefire with
Hezbollah".
They're joking, right? Olmert's violence is played out as
an offer for peace!
But it's no joke. It is simply business as usual in a
media that is owned and operated as a subsidiary of the
Zionist state. The media turns everything upside down:
revenge murders carried out with a powerful military
armed by US money are 'defence', while people fighting
for their lives with homemade rockets and old rifles are
'terrorists'.
Welcome to the pathocracy.
Robert Fisk reported last week on a village in Lebanon
whose occupants were ordered by the Israelis to evacuate
before their village was to be bombed. As the villagers
left, the Israeli's targeted not their homes and
businesses, but the fleeing villagers themselves. They
were killed. All of them, men women and at least 9
children.
Then John Bolton has the gall to step up and say "I
think it would be a mistake to ascribe moral equivalence
to civilians who die as the direct result of malicious
terrorist acts," he added, while defending as
"self-defense" Israel's military action, which
has had "the tragic and unfortunate consequence of
civilian deaths".
"It's simply not the same thing to say that it's the
same act to deliberately target innocent civilians, to
desire their deaths, to fire rockets and use explosive
devices or kidnapping versus the sad and highly
unfortunate consequences of self-defense."
Did you catch that? The willing and knowing slaughter of
over 200 Lebanese civilians by Israel in the past 5 days
is only the "sad and highly unfortunate consequences
of self-defense"?!
Can you see how far down in the muck of psychopathic
values we have become mired? Can you see that there is no
humanity in Bolton's words? That it is a sound bite meant
to reassure the American public that the Palestinians and
the Lebanese are no better than animals, that it is OK to
slaughter them wholescale in the name of
"defence"? That it is meant to put you back to
sleep so that all the noise of those bombs is disturbing
your rest?
And this just in: "Race
to Rescue 20,000 Brits Trapped in Lebanon Hell".
It wasn't hell a week ago. You know, before Israel
started bombing it back to the stone age.
But it's their own damn fault, right?
We
read today as well that "UK Foreign Secretary
Margaret Beckett has accused Hezbollah militants of
'pouring petrol on the bonfire'"! You mean the fire
ignited in Gaza when Israel launched the invasion? Or
maybe the fire ignited when the great, Western
democracies decided the Palestinians needed to be
collectively punished for voting for Hamas? Or could it
be the fire that started to burn when Palestine was taken
away from the people that had been living there for
thousands of years and given to the Jews?
Of course not! It is simply because Arabs are different
than "you and me". They don't value life the
way "we" do. After all, anyone else on the
globe would have been happy to turn over their ancestral
land to the Jews after WW2, right? And when the new
residents started demanding more and more and more,
anyone but the Arabs would have been happy to continue
giving them everything they demanded. Wouldn't you? If
only those unreasonable Arabs were as unattached to their
land as Americans...
Let's be honest here, if soldiers were to come and break
down the doors of your home at night, you would welcome
them in, offer them a smoke and a drink, wouldn't you?
"Hey, just make yourselves comfortable. What's mine
is yours. It's just those damn Arabs, be they Palestinian
or Lebanese or Iraqi who go and make a fuss about
searches that destroy all their belongings and heirlooms,
or "accidents" that kill their children, or
bulldozers that raze their houses. Anyone else in the
world would have been happy to do any of this after all
that the Jews suffered in WW2. Wouldn't they?
I suppose it's just bad luck that the Zionists had to
choose the one place on the planet where they weren't
going to be welcome.
|
