APRIL 2007

What is astounding is the lack of any attention to making this history even roughly congruent with the events that have been entered on the record over the last 13 years since this preposterous notion of a genocide in 100 days was cooked up. There is no reason you should know more about the history of Rwanda than any other American--and the 'dark continent' kind of forbids our honest intellectual penetration, but surely someone even slightly sensitive to racialist and racist tendencies should see that this writer has begrudged the Rwandan's, Hutu, Tutsi and Twa(The earliest confirmed inhabitants of the region now known as Rwanda were the pygmy Twa, a group now accounting for only about one percent (1%) of Rwanda's population and playing only a marginal role in Rwandan life.) alike, any sense of their own political history.

All the" who ruled whom" blather--who were the Marxist and couldn't even spell Marxists. All the talk about Kagame the poor refugee in Uganda is such bullshit as to send one out for a tetanus shot. Kagame comes from the line of Kings and Queens of Rwanda. His cousin, Queen Gacanda [fact-check that name], stayed in Rwanda after the social revolution of 1959-62 and sold milk in the public market. She was murdered in the uprising after the presidential assassination, but she had tried (unsuccessfully) to talk cousin Paul out of destroying her Rwanda--and the RPF considered any Tutsi living inside Rwanda to be a collaborator and therefore fair game. The two Rwandan revolutionary governments, first that of Gregoire Kaybanda until 1973, then that of Juvénal Habyarimana from 1973 until his murder by Kagame and his 'network commando', brought Rwanda from the bottom to the top of African standard of living. Rwanda was the model of success in post-colonial Africa, everything worked, the highways, the telephones, the hospitals. Then Western business rigged the collapse of the world coffee market and the IMF/World Bank neoliberal adjustments brought it down.

And then Kagame and the RPF came in and slaughtered people for 4 years, assassinated all kinds of political VIPs, maintained a reign of terror bloodier than the contras', assassinated two African (Hutu) heads of state then, just like with 911, suppressed any investigation of the terrorist act. And what makes this undeniable even by your writer is that it is perfectly reasonable: the way a tiny minority like the Tutsi RPF could gain political power in Rwanda was through terror; just as it's the only way the tiny elite served by Bush/Clinton/Bush can maintain control.

--Jocelyn, this has all been demonstrated in courts and before government commissions with incontrovertible evidence; it's not a matter of opinion or international PR. Kagame even murdered his predecessor, the leader of his own RPF 'rebel force' after the 1 October 1990 invasion, to take control of these so-called rebels--nothing more than a US-backed invasion force, trained and equipped by the Americans. I've been quite curious just how this World Jewish Congress/Christian Zionist (the Tutsis are known as the Jews of Africa)/Christian Democrat/Green/Trotskyist pro-RPF lobby would react to recent evidence of the real genocidaire in Rwanda--and Yugoslavia--and Iraq. Your article is a fine example of the ends to which these hysterical death merchants will go to protect their petty bylines, their miserable careers, their small college professorships, and their craven wage slavery to the Holocaust Industry and the Genocide gin game. Here's what my friend Chris Black had to say about the piece--Chris is General Ndindiliyimana's defense counsel before the Arusha Tribunal and was one of the cross examiners of Gen Dallaire who brought out the truth about who killed whom--and it wasn't the Rwandan or French governments or their armies.


Terrible,

I dont know who this guy is but he ignores the fact that Rwanda was way ahead in terms of development before the war and had those growth rates and higher before the war under the Hutu regime and Kagame can only clam to be bringing it back to its former level before he destroyed everything. What a whitewash. So Rwanda is now the stomping ground of all the usual carptebaggers (mainly Amnerican, it seems) and right wing christians who indoctrinate Africans that no change can come about through human agency, only prayer and self-flagellation. lack of democracy-no problem-Kagame is a nice guy-that he shot down the plane-French propaganda in retalation for his attacks on them-Hutus still likely repsonsbile-which is by the way, still the official position of the prosecution and the tribunal as a body even now.

Sickening. Tell her she would do a grave injustice to the truth if she republshes this propaganda piece for the RPF.

meanwhile today we recieved the answer to our motion to acquit. Denied. I'll send it to you if you have the time to read it. Not too long. Totally ignores our arguments. They erased the testimony of Dallaire re command responsibility. Never happened. The final judgement has already been written.

Chris

Do whatever you think is right, Jocelyn. But if this appears on Handstand, your journal will have joined the ranks of those other intellectual pretenders who lend their limited talents to the militarization of everyday life in exchange for the permission to continue living in bad faith and respiring toxic lies that cost millions their innocent lives.

Good luck,
Mick

UN report accuses Western companies of looting Congo

By Chris Talbot
26 October 2002

An investigation carried out by a team of experts on behalf of the United Nations shows how the four year old war in the Congo has enabled the large-scale and systematic robbery of the country’s mineral wealth.Rival groups of local politicians, military leaders and criminal elements are engaged in mining operations that use forced labour, child soldiers as well as indiscriminate killing and brutalising of the local populations that is reminiscent of the colonial rule of King Leopold of Belgium a century ago. None of the looting operations could be carried out without the collaboration and financial backing of Western companies that deal in rare metals, gems and other resources.

The report gives details of the activities carried out in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), including some in conjunction with its military backers from Zimbabwe, as well as by the various groups acting in Congo with military support either from Rwanda or Uganda. Whilst the latter countries entered the war as allies, the report explains how they fought each other over diamond mining, with the key city of Kisangani ending up under Rwandan control.

Although only a few examples are given of how billions of dollars from the illegal sale of diamonds, gold, coltan (columbite-tantalite—the rare mineral used in the manufacture of mobile phones, laptops, which can fetch as much as $400 a kilogram), cobalt, etc. end up in the accounts of Western multinationals, the report lists 85 companies based in the United States, Europe and South Africa that are said to be breaking OECD “ethical guidelines.” They include names such as Anglo American, Barclays Bank and De Beers from Britain, Bayer A.G. from Germany and America Mineral Fields and Cabot Corporation from the US.

One of the key businessmen in DRC mining is the Belgian George Forrest. He is said to have “strong backing from some political quarters in Belgium,” although he was accused in a Belgian diplomatic cable seen by the investigators of running a “strategy of attrition” in the mining sector. Forrest operates in partnership with the US based OM Group and is said to run “one of the most profitable mining operations” in the DRC, which provides “the most marginal benefit” for the state mining corporation. It has access to a copper and cobalt stockpile in the Katanga region containing over 3,000 tons of the rare metal germanium, widely used in the electronics industry, and said to be worth more than $2 billion.

Bribing local officials to obtain mining licences and export permits is a normal procedure in gaining access to mineral exploitation. The UN investigators state that they have “extensive documentation” showing how First Quantum Minerals of Canada offered a down payment of $100 million to the DRC government to gain access to mineral concessions, as well as “cash payments and shares held in trust” to government ministers and officials, including the national security minister, the director of the National Intelligence Agency and the director of the state mining company.

Zimbabwean businessman John Bredenkamp is another key operator in the DRC, said by the report to be “experienced in setting up clandestine companies and sanctions-busing operations.” He has investments in a company said to “represent British Aerospace, Dornier of France and Augusta of Italy in Africa,” as well as controlling another company that supplies logistics to the Zimbabwean army.

Examples are given in the report of “commercial chains” linking the looting of minerals by local officials and soldiers with Western companies. A joint venture between the DRC government and the Zimbabwean military elite called Minerals Business Company (MBC) is said to use Zimbabwe’s influence to avoid paying licensing fees. MBC sells diamonds to the US firm Flashes of Color, the Swiss-based Ibryn & Associates, and Belgian-based companies Abadiam, Jewel Impex, Komal Gems and Diagem.

Another commercial chain relates to coltan from the Rwandan controlled eastern region of the Congo. A local concessionary, Eagle Wings Resources International, is a subsidiary of Trinitech International Inc. of the US . Eagle Wings is said not to “fulfil its full responsibilities to the public treasury” in the locality and to collaborate with the Rwandan army to “receive privileged access to coltan sites and captive labour.”

Some of the proceeds from Eagle Wings are sold to H.C. Starck, a subsidiary of the German transnational Bayer AG. Starck has repeatedly denied obtaining coltan from the Congo, but the UN team showed that consignments were routed through a company in Mozambique which provided false documents, then via South Africa to H.C.Starck in Thailand. A report from a key processing facility, Ningxia Non-Ferrous Metals Smeltery of China, seen by the UN investigators notes that 50 percent of the coltan it purchases originates in Central Africa—i.e. primarily from mining under control of the “Congo desk” of the Rwandan army that pay no taxes and use what the UN report describes as “a variety of forced labour regimes.” There is said to be widespread use of prisoners brought into the Congo from Rwanda as indentured labour.

The war’s impact

As well as providing much new information on the scramble for the Congo’s resources, the UN report gives some idea of the impact of the war on the population. It points out that the previous estimate for deaths due to the war, either directly through military attacks or indirectly through disease and malnutrition in the five eastern provinces of the Congo, was 2.5 million. That figure was for the period from August 1998 to April 2001. Assuming, as is likely, that the horrific conditions in the region have continued that would mean in excess of 3.5 million deaths today. The report suggests that in areas affected by the conflict the mortality rate for children under five years is as high as 35 percent.

In the areas occupied by Rwanda the UN has already estimated that 1.5 million people were displaced in March 2001. The present report explains how the Rwandan army, as well as the Rwandan-backed rebels, seize food and property from local inhabitants. Public infrastructure has been devastated and the Secretary General of the DRC in Goma requisitioned all revenue generated by public utilities and parastatals. Water purification for Kisangani and Bukavu stopped through lack of chemicals and power stations closed through lack of repair. The Catholic Church has protested “thefts, torture, extortions, rapes and piracy on Lake Tanganyika,” carried out by the military. NGO’s have reported groups of women being taken hostage and subject to sexual abuse, as well as children being forced to work in the mines and conscripted into the armies.

A similar catalogue of horrors is reported in the Ugandan occupied areas. The Ugandan army has trained the militia of a tribal group, the Hema, creating widespread conflict with another tribal grouping, the Lendu, who have also armed themselves. The UN report local young men all joining militias with no alternative source of food or medicine. “Children are killed, adult victims are eviscerated, women are raped, property stolen, houses burnt, churches demolished and whatever infrastructure exists is laid waste.”

A collapse of already limited public services is also reported in the DRC-Zimbabwe controlled areas. In Kasai Oriental four out of five water production plants don’t function and the fifth, in the diamond centre of Mbuji Mayi, runs at 20 percent capacity. A similar position holds in Kasai Occidental. The report states this is due to the diversion of state funds, often through fraud. Taxes have increased, allegedly to pay for the war, yet soldiers are largely unpaid and live by thieving and pillaging from the local population. In the South Katanga area deaths are increasing from malaria and dysentery. Medical facilities are non-existent and medical professionals are unpaid. The impact is acute on children, with 12 percent of all children under five dying each year.

Much of the UN report is given over to detailing the “elite networks” operating in the three areas controlled by the DRC government and Zimbabwe, Rwanda and Uganda respectively. In each case a small number of politicians, administrators, and military leaders “monopolise production, commerce and fiscal functions” and maintain their activities “through control of the military or other security forces that they use to intimidate, threaten violence or carry out selected acts of violence.” Air transport, arms deals and other transactions are carried out through “organised or transnational criminal groups.”

Although supposedly carried out with a view to imposing an end to the war in the Congo with an agreement backed by the US and other Western governments, the UN investigation exposes the sham nature of a peace process that has dragged on now for more than two years.

Under Western pressure Zimbabwe, Rwanda and Uganda are withdrawing at least some of their forces. Uganda has trained local militia to replace the official army. “There will be little change in the control that Ugandans exercise over trade flows and economic resources”, states the report. Rwanda has replaced local officials with Rwandan nationals, the local currency was replaced with Rwandan currency, and the Rwandan army battalions that control mining will no longer wear their official uniforms and a significant number of Rwandan soldiers will be integrated into the local DRC militia. The Zimbabwean armed forces have set up new companies and contractual arrangements with the DRC, with a “private Zimbabwean military company” set up to guard Zimbabwe’s economic assets.

The UN report concludes, despite vain hopes that the West will halt the looting of the Congo, that “the necessary networks have already become deeply embedded to ensure that the illegal exploitation continues, independent of the physical presence of the foreign armies.”