![]() |
||||
| THE HANDSTAND | APRIL 2007 |
|||
![]() Accusations of UN cover-up in Haiti http://www.haitiaction.net/News/HIP/2_2_7/2_2_7.html February 2, 2007 News HaitiAction.net by Haiti Information Project http://www.teledyol.net/HIP/about.html HIP - UN Special Envoy to Haiti, Edmond Mulet, held a roundtable discussion at the Center for International and Strategic Studies (CSIS) in Washington this past Wednesday. The CSIS event capped off what amounted to a whirlwind week long propaganda tour by Mulet where he has sought to mitigate reports of UN forces killing unarmed civilians in recent raids against gangs in the Port-au-Prince shanty town of Cite Soleil. In response to questions about the huge amount of firepower used by UN forces in recent raids and the growing number of accounts of unarmed civilians felled by UN bullets, Mulet made an extraordinary claim. He stated, "[This past Jan. 24]...we were under attack for over an hour and they [gangs in Cite Soleil] shot more than 20,000 rounds at us - 20,000 rounds at us." A former UN employee and law enforcement expert assigned to Haiti and speaking on condition of anonymity commented, "That's just ridiculous. We never received reports of gangs in Cite Soleil having that kind of firepower. You also have to ask how Mulet got that number of 20,000 rounds shot at UN forces? Did they stop to pick up the cartridges and count them afterwards? I don't think so." Mulet's assertion comes on the heels of the release of Freedom of Information Act documents that show the United Nations acknowledged firing more than 22,000 rounds of ammunition during a seven-hour period in a highly controversial raid of Cite Soleil on July 6, 2005. The UN claimed they had only killed six "bandits" while human rights organizations and community activists claimed as many as 70 may have been killed, the vast majority unarmed civilians. In the same document, a personal commentary apparently added by former US Ambassador James B. Foley states, "It remains unclear how aggressive MINUSTAH was, though 22,000 rounds is a large amount of ammunition to have killed only six people." To this day, not a single international human rights organization has undertaken a serious investigation into the allegations. The former UN employee added, "I read the reports where the UN admitted firing more than 22,000 rounds in a seven hour period on July, 6, 2005. It appears that Mulet is playing a numbers game to diminish the impact of that report. If there are gangs of 30 armed men running around with 20,000 rounds of ammunition than you're no longer talking about just gangs. You're talking about an armed insurgency and Mulet can't have it both ways. It's even more ridiculous if you do the math. It would have required each gunman to fire more than 650 sustained rounds each during the one-hour period to account for the nearly six bullets fired per second, as he would have the public believe. That's a battle of epic proportions, which I think we would have seen reported in the press by now. I just don't see it." During Mulet's presentation at CSIS in Washington, he also managed to alienate the few Haitians who attended the event. He claimed that, "... there are many sectors who don't like our presence there. That is certain and they dislike us enormously. Of course, I have [identified] them as the ones who are involved in drug trafficking, the ones who benefit from impunity, from the disorder, from the lack of state, from lack of institutions, the people who benefit from contraband, from lack of institutions." In an interview on the radio program Variety and Vibrations heard on 1320 AM WLQY in Miami FL, a Mr. Wilbert Clerizier responded, "I was there and I took that to mean the Lavalas movement. That what he was saying was that the only people who oppose the UN occupation are Lavalas and that they are all drug dealers and criminals. I responded to Mr. Mulet that they should leave Haiti because they helped to legitimize the overthrow of the constitutional government. That would make me a drug dealer and a criminal too, which I am neither." Lavalas is the political movement of Haiti's desperately poor majority and the political party of president Jean-Bertrand Aristide who was ousted on February 29, 2004 in a coup reportedly backed by the United States, France and Canada. Perhaps even more controversial was Mulet's attempt to write the epitaph for the Lavalas movement when he stated, "And to the Jean-Bertrand Aristide issue, when I first arrived in Haiti on the 2nd of June last year, we've had different marches and manifestations - all sorts of protests demanding for the return of this ex-president and former president. In the beginning, these were expressions of 5,000 people. Then later on they became 3,000 and the last ones maybe 75...50 people. So I see that this issue of former President Aristide is not present anymore in the political sphere in Haiti anymore, and his movement - familia Lavalas - is very much divided, weakened." Contradicting Mulet is HIP video and photographs documenting a demonstration of over ten thousand people launched from Cite Soleil this last December 16. Protestors were demanding Aristide's return, an end the UN military occupation of Haiti and the release of Lavalas political prisoners. All of this took place a mere seven weeks ago and according to Pierre-Antoine Lovinsky, one of the Lavalas organizers, "December 16, 2006 is not that long ago but long enough to go beyond the collective memory of the UN and the apparent temporary amnesia of Mr. Mulet."
Human rights organizations have accused
the former military along with paramilitary death squads
of having sowed a campaign of terror against Aristide
supporters following his ouster in Feb. 2004. As part of
UN policy, they were integrated into the Haitian police
that was also accused of committing gross human rights
violations against Aristide supporters including summary
executions and arbitrary arrests. After having illegally
seized the residence of the exiled former president in
late 2004, the brutal former military was rewarded with a
payoff of more that 29 million dollars, or $5000 per
former soldier, paid for with funds provided by the
international community.
|
||||