APRIL 2007
EU and USA Governments intend increasing sanctions on Sudan's government and Seamus Heaney and Gunther Grasse open their mouths to beg for Darfur Relief. Are these authors so incredibly single minded that they cannot realise that , sanctions, casting a stone with a powerful hand, infers aggression? No government can be said to have the right to guide another one since George Bush and Tony Blair took power into their irresponsible hands.
The fuss about Angela Merkel's "secret" discussions behind the European Union reflect her childhood years in East Germany, as her father gathered people in their homefor secret discussion on the possibilities of re-uniting Germany. They merit the huge protest she has received against such activities.
Primarily Western Government interest
are economic - "national " interests and their
historic aggressions as applied in Palestine at present,
and the Oil interests of all UN 's largest nations
pervade our present times. The addition of nobel
prize-winners to their ranks is appalling.There must
surely be a general agreement about this - for sure, the
whole world watches the Zionists manipulate the status
quo of prominent people who could successfully censure
them, using "anti-semitism" as a threat to that
status - or otherwise Heaney and co would ask for Relief
in Palestine.
| The UN Partition Plan
of 1947 recommended that 56% of the land be
set aside for a Jewish State, 42% for an Arab
state and 2% for an internationalised
Jerusalem and its surrounds - the world has
not said a word about the land that was seized by
Zionist terrorists before the
State of Israel was proclaimed on 14 May 1948.
Through a series of shocking massacres, the
territory assigned to the Jews suddenly became
77% resulting in more than 750,000
Palestinians being forcibly expelled and
dispossessed of their homes, personal property
and their homeland. The Jewish State then
came into being without waiting for the United
Nations Commission - prescribed in the
Partition resolution - to hand authority
progressively over to the Jewish and Arab leaders
for their respective states.
And after the 1948 war, Israel declared
Jerusalem its capital in contravention of
its internationally-recognised status of corpus
separatum – a status that is still
recognised. Effectively, the new state of
Israel was not only created in violation
of, it continued to violate, the very
resolution which Israelis now look to as giving
them sovereignty. The Arab state
imposed by the UN Partition Plan without
consultation and in contradiction to the UN
charter - which should have upheld the
majority indigenous Palestinians’
right to self-determination - has since
been deliberately and methodically whittled
away by Israel, leaving nothing but
isolated non-contiguous parcels of land to some 4
million Palestinians. Around 170,000 Palestinians remained in what became Israel, the largest number of whom resided in the Galilee area, originally a designated part of the Arab state under the Partition Plan. These Palestinians also became the victims of Israel’s land grab policy. Over 438,000 acres, which was more than the total Jewish land holdings at the time, were confiscated and a further 400,000 acres were marked for confiscation. After Israel won the 1967 war, the total territory of Palestine came under Israel’s rule. It annexed East Jerusalem, despite the Holy City’s internationally recognised status and began implementing its Jewish settlement program with a vengeance. Sonja Karkar |
All these top writers are terrified
of being thought anti-semitic and openly accused of it.
And imagine the loss of income to all who create a market
for James Joyce's Jewish book, Ulysses !!
The Zionists are busy in Africa too - there is no denying it. So take that discontented look off your face, Mr Heaney, yes, there was a free lunch for the Nobel Prize winner - but in the real world people all have thoughts of their own that nearly always concur on matters of common sense. Mr Pintermite, Bob Giltoff and Bonogood all fear the hot-rod of Judea in a history book - though ofcourse as Tony Blair said - you don't need knowledge of history to manage this stuff..................also
Bahrain's information minister talks about meeting Paul Bremer. He reports that he asked him whether he has read any book on Iraq's history, or whether he has read Hanna Batatu's book on modern Iraq. "No," said Bremer.
There is an Arab Government in Sudan
and since they moved south into Sudan after the British
left. There has not been anything the native Sudanese
could do to alter the balance. Nor can they alter the
prevailing history from centuries back of long droughts
in the area.The Arabs had comandeered the Salt Trade,
they came in with lorries, money and rifles. The herdsmen
of Sudan had been already ruined by prevailing years of
drought combined with overgrazing since the British left.
A sad story that perhaps no one can remedy .
JB,Editor
AP (UAE)
08/02/2007
The Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Tribunal,
which opened with a preliminary meeting, does not have
the legal authority of an international organisation and
cannot impose penalties, but its main aim is
to condemn leaders in history books,
Mahathir said.
Kuala Lumpur: Former Malaysian Prime
Minister Mahathir Mohammad urged Iraqi insurgents
yesterday to make the United States "pay a very high
price" for its occupation of Iraq.
In his most provocative public remarks on the Iraq war
yet, Mahathir said he wanted to "congratulate the
Iraqi resistance" for successfully turning public
opinion against US President George W. Bush and British
Prime Minister Tony Blair. "Make sure that the
Americans will pay a very high price for their
adventure," Mahathir said at an international
anti-war conference in Kuala Lumpur. "Unfortunately,
you may have to kill a lot of Americans. When the coffins
go back, when the body bags are carried back to America,
it will help the Americans to change their minds,"
Mahathir said to loud applause from 1,500 activists.
"If President Bush is willing to lead his army, but
from the front, then by all means let's all go to
war," he said. "But since he's not going to do
that, I think we should strive with all our might to
spread the new faith, the new belief that war is not an
option, war is not a way of settling any dispute."
War crimes tribunal
Mahathir spoke after launching a tribunal that plans to
hold trials based on complaints by Iraqis and
Palestinians against world leaders including Bush, Blair,
Australian Prime Minister John Howard and Israeli
ex-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. The Kuala Lumpur War
Crimes Tribunal, which opened with a preliminary meeting,
does not have the legal authority of an international
organisation and cannot impose penalties, but its main
aim is to condemn leaders in history books, Mahathir
said.AP (UAE)
08/02/2007