
FROM JERICHO FAR FROM THE
POLLS
By Barry Chamish
Olmert attacks
Jericho and the Israeli Right is so proud of him. The
CFR-owned Right-wing weekly rag Makor Rishon just kvells
its approval of the army. The army killed two PLO guards
and then two Israelis were murdered within a day near
Ariel. Thirty-four Arabs were wounded defending the
prison in Jericho where the "murderers" of
former Tourism Minister were recaptured by the IDF. And
the Right was so darn happy with the operation, it gave
Kadima two more seats in the Knesset.
EXCEPT...it was all
another horrid lie. Zeevi was murdered by and for Shimon
Peres, with a bit of help from Ariel Sharon. And as far
as I saw, only one writer, Joel Skousen referred to this
fact:
Saadat, the leader of the Popular Front for Liberation
of Palestine, is believed to have ordered the
assassination of cabinet minister Rehavam Ze'evi in in a
Jerusalem hotel in 2000. What isn't widely known,
however, is that Israeli security was involved in
allowing the killing, having put Ze'evi in an insecure
hotel location and withdrawn his guards so the attackers
could get to him.
Israel claims that they raided the prison in order to
prevent PA president Mahmoud Abbas from freeing Saadat as
he publicly promised to do last week. But, it may just as
well have been to prevent Saadat from disclosing any
collusion with the Israeli's in the elimination of the
pesky and outspoken Ze'evi, who wasn't going along with
PM Sharon's sellout policies.
Only one
writer sent me a reminder of the facts:
http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=9254
"In another portion of the interview
that was edited out, Arafat apparently
said that the Israeli Mossad (external intelligence
service) was behind the
assassination in Jerusalem of Israeli cabinet minister
Rehav'am Ze'evi."
I'll
remind you of my conclusion:
In early October, 2001, Zeevi threatened Sharon. If
Peres did not stop his secret diplomacy, he would
publicly reveal what it involved. Sharon acquiesced and
had a letter drawn promising that he would order Peres to
cancel a planned meeting with Arafat in Greece. A week
before his murder, Zeevi displayed the letter at a party
caucus meeting.
Sharon's appeasement did not succeed for long. On October
13, 2001 Zeevi handed Sharon his final ultimatum: Peres
is removed from the cabinet or he will resign from the
government and take two parties with him; Yisrael
B'aliyah and the National Party. Sharon was given a
choice between Peres and suicidal withdrawal, or his
coalition. Sharon went with Peres and withdrawal.
On Oct. 17, 2001, four hours before Zeevi was to give his
resignation speech to the Knesset, explaining who Peres
was and why he couldn't sit in the same government as
him, he was shot dead outside his hotel room in
Jerusalem. Arabs may have been the triggermen, but the
order came from within the Israeli government.
Hamas was letting the
murderers threaten Peres and that is never smart. The
British and American guards paid to guard the Arabs
pulled out early and Olmert took away the troublemakers.
And so far, it's only cost Israel and the PA 4 dead and
34 wounded. But more are on the way. That's what happens
when Sharon murderers Olmert and Peres are number one and
two in Kadima.
This election has been a
gruesome fraud. I had candidate Yaacov Schlosser over on
Friday. He was being primed to get into the Knesset by
demanding that the police investigate the way Sharon went
down. But he had a nasty call on his cell phone and is
now way to frightened to carry on. So, out he goes.
The election had one issue only,
the removal of Judea and Samaria from Israel. But no one
was going to debate that. Of course, the debater should
have been Moshe Feiglin, except Netanyahu had a 12 second
morning meeting with Feiglin and he was banned seeking a
Likud seat to the Knesset.
How long have I argued
that the "Right Wing Activists" like Itamar Ben
Gvir and Avigdor Eskin committed some dreadful crime and
were forced to become provocateurs. That's how it's done
and now the legal system is letting them collect some
compensation from the courts. For years I was told
Feiglin was ordered to break up Zo Artzeinu and take all
his protesters to nowhere in the Likud. There, they would
be given a bit of laxity, but that would go when the time
was right.
That time came and now
there is no one to vote for and no Yesha withdrawal to
debate.
Too bad Feiglin followers!
Anyone plan to keep in his fold?
For that matter, anyone
planning to vote in the Israeli election?
I guess I should state
that Israel is being brought down by the Vatican and
their American buddies in the Council On Foreign
Relations (CFR). The country's leaders are the most
deranged crooks the CFR can cook up. This time the mafia
is led by an Olmert/Peres, with a Bibi ready to make it a
third. Other years there's been a Sharon, or Barak, or
what was Shai's name, placed to get Sharon in, or Rabin.
And all have been created and financed by the CFR. The
exception is Peres who is the Vatican's toy-boy, but who
cares by now? It's the same team anyway.
The plot has a few more
subtleties, like bringing in second stage leadership by
showing them how the world's media is going to destroy
Zionism by leaking some utterly dreadful secrets from the
1930s. But these "leaders" don't realize that
the Jews of Israel will have to stand up to the truth
sooner or later and there are proper ways to win. They
are too terrified to tell their truth.
Incredibly, some from the
Right are encouraging people to vote.
Shame on them.
If you vote, you support
the scam. You have one choice only. You do not vote and
prepare to fight later.
That is the only option
that exists today in Israel. Face it.
www.barrychamish.com.
Britain's Duplicity and
the Siege of Jericho Jail
Jonathan Cook, The
Electronic Intifada, 15 March 2006
 |
| Israeli military vehicles take
position near Jericho prison during an incursion
to arrest PFLP leader Ahmed Saadat who was
accused of masterminding the murder of an Israeli
minister in 2001 and has been held in jail under
British and American supervision ever since March
14, 2006. (MaanImages/Omar Abu Awad) |
In the looking-glass world of Middle East politics, it is
easy to forget that Ahmad Saadat, the imprisoned
Palestinian leader Israel summarily arrested in Jericho
late on Tuesday, is wanted for masterminding the killing
of the Jewish state's most notorious racist
politician-general.
Rehavam Zeevi, head of the Central Command in the late
1960s and early 1970s, personally developed and managed
Israel's brutal regime in the newly occupied West Bank.
After retiring from the battlefield, he waged a
relentless war against "the Arabs" on the
political front. His Moledet party, founded in the 1980s,
advocated the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from
Greater Israel - in other words, from Israel and the
occupied territories.
His thinking became so acceptable after the outbreak of
the intifada that he was appointed tourism minister in
Ariel Sharon's first cabinet. Maybe Sharon thought that,
with Zeevi for company, he really might start to look
like a man of peace.
Zeevi's killing by gunmen in a Jerusalem hotel in 2001
was about as close as the Palestinians have managed to
get to emulating an Israeli-style targeted assassination
- with the difference that, in the Palestinian operation,
no bystanders were killed.
Israelis were, and still are, horrified by the killing of
Zeevi, with most taking the view that the Palestinians
broke all the rules of engagement in targeting an elected
politician. That neatly ignores the point that Zeevi's
death was retribution for Israel's earlier assassination
of a widely respected Palestinian politician, Abu Ali
Mustafa, the leader of the Popular Front for the
Liberation of Palestine.
But what is sauce for the goose was never going to be
sauce for the gander.

|
PFLP
Secretary General Ahmad Sa'adat speaks during a
press conference with Nasser Al-Laham Chief
Editor of Maan News Agency in his prison at
the West Bank city of Jericho January 13, 2006. (MaanImages/Iyad
Atayat)
|
Ahmad Saadat, Mustafa's successor and the man blamed
by Israel for Zeevi's killing, raced to the top of the
army's wanted list. Under international pressure, the
Palestinian Authority, in the days before it was entirely
dismembered by the Israeli army, arrested him.
To prevent his targeting for assassination by Israel, and
in the vain hope of winning a reprieve for Yasser Arafat
from his effective house arrest in Ramallah, the
Palestinian leadership brokered a deal with Britain and
the United States in 2002. The two countries agreed to
provide monitors to guarantee Saadat's confinement in the
tiny West Bank town of Jericho, in the sun-baked lowlands
of the Jordan Valley.
Four years later, on Tuesday morning, Britain reneged on
its understandings with the Palestinians and quit
Jericho, but not before telling Israel it was going. As
if waiting for its cue, Israeli armour rolled into
Jericho at once to capture Saadat and a handful of other
wanted men.
To Palestinians, the British broken promise, as well as
the hasty exit from Jericho and apparent collusion with
Israel, all smacked a little too painfully of other
episodes of British foreign policy in the Middle East.
There were echoes of 1956 and London's pact during the
Suez Crisis with Israel on the invasion of Egypt. And
there were echoes too of 1948, when Britain hurriedly
abandoned Palestine, though not before it had effectively
fulfilled the Balfour Declaration's promise of creating a
Jewish homeland by allowing hundreds of thousands of Jews
to immigrate.
That in large part explains the outpouring of rage from
Gaza to Ramallah on Tuesday, as well as the kidnapping of
foreigners. Britain's duplicity was a reminder - if it
was needed - that nothing has changed in a century of
Western "diplomacy".
So what was Britain's defence of its inflammatory action?
According to foreign minister Jack Straw, Britain had no
choice but to pull the monitors out of Jericho because of
growing concerns for their safety.
That will have sounded more than hollow to Palestinians.
The intifada has all but passed Jericho by. With a
population of about 15,000, it is the quietest place in
the West Bank and Gaza. During the decades of Israeli
occupation it earnt an unflattering reputation as the
dumping ground for small-time collaborators, the ones
Israel did not reward with safe haven in its own
territory.
Jericho is a small Palestinian island in a sea of
Israeli occupation. Most of the Jordan Valley has been
entirely controlled by Israel for decades. According to
reports in the Hebrew media, Israel is poised to announce
the Valley's annexation sometime after its elections
later this month.
Around Jericho itself the Israeli army has dug a deep
ditch to prevent all unauthorised movement in and out of
the city. And beyond that is the busy "settlers'
highway" through the occupied Jordan Valley, linking
Jerusalem with the north of Israel, officially known as
Gandhi's Road - after Rehavam Zeevi. He earned the
nickname "Gandhi" as a skinny youth in the
army.
In fact Jericho has been so peaceful during the intifada
that six months ago, Israel reopened it to tourism,
allowing package tours to pass through the Israeli-manned
checkpoint on the only route into the city. I myself have
visited the city on several recent occasions, staying in
its hotels and enjoying their open-all-year swimming
pools. What is apparently safe for tourists and
journalists is not safe enough for British officials.
The problem now is that Straw's "concerns"
about safety may become self-fulfilling. A backlash
against foreigners is as certain as the attack on Tuesday
against the British Council offices in Gaza. There are
few tourists in the West Bank any longer, particularly
since Israel made entering so difficult with the
construction of its wall. But there are still a
significant number of foreigners working for humanitarian
organisations.
Their presence is important. Many of the organisations
themselves have become little more than sticking
plasters, unable to cope with the festering sores of
Palestinian life under an ever-more restrictive
occupation. But having foreigners living in Ramallah,
Nablus and Hebron offers an insurance policy - even if a
small and inadequate one - against more reckless Israeli
army incursions. At the very least, foreigners can bear
witness.
There would be nothing worse than the West Bank - after
Israel's limited withdrawals and the completion of its
wall - becoming a tiny Palestinian ghetto-state, one
where neither the international media nor aid workers
dare venture. There is also nothing that would satisfy
Israel more.
Jonathan Cook, a British journalist living in
Nazareth, is the author of "Blood and Religion: The
Unmasking of the Jewish and Democratic State",
published by Pluto Press next month. His website is www.jkcook.net.
|