THE HANDSTAND

APRIL 2006




   FROM JERICHO FAR FROM THE POLLS
                                                 By Barry Chamish


       Olmert attacks Jericho and the Israeli Right is so proud of him. The CFR-owned Right-wing weekly rag Makor Rishon just kvells its approval of the army. The army killed two PLO guards and then two Israelis were murdered within a day near Ariel. Thirty-four Arabs were wounded defending the prison in Jericho where the "murderers" of former Tourism Minister were recaptured by the IDF. And the Right was so darn happy with the operation, it gave Kadima two more seats in the Knesset.
       EXCEPT...it was all another horrid lie. Zeevi was murdered by and for Shimon Peres, with a bit of help from Ariel Sharon. And as far as I saw, only one writer, Joel Skousen referred to this fact:

Saadat, the leader of the Popular Front for Liberation of Palestine, is believed to have ordered the assassination of cabinet minister Rehavam Ze'evi in in a Jerusalem hotel in 2000. What isn't widely known, however, is that Israeli security was involved in allowing the killing, having put Ze'evi in an insecure hotel location and withdrawn his guards so the attackers could get to him.

Israel claims that they raided the prison in order to prevent PA president Mahmoud Abbas from freeing Saadat as he publicly promised to do last week. But, it may just as well have been to prevent Saadat from disclosing any collusion with the Israeli's in the elimination of the pesky and outspoken Ze'evi, who wasn't going along with PM Sharon's sellout policies.

       
Only one writer sent me a reminder of the facts:

http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=9254
"In another portion of the interview that was edited out, Arafat apparently
said that the Israeli Mossad (external intelligence service) was behind the
assassination in Jerusalem of Israeli cabinet minister Rehav'am Ze'evi."

        
I'll remind you of my conclusion:

In early October, 2001, Zeevi threatened Sharon. If Peres did not stop his secret diplomacy, he would publicly reveal what it involved. Sharon acquiesced and had a letter drawn promising that he would order Peres to cancel a planned meeting with Arafat in Greece. A week before his murder, Zeevi displayed the letter at a party caucus meeting.
Sharon's appeasement did not succeed for long. On October 13, 2001 Zeevi handed Sharon his final ultimatum: Peres is removed from the cabinet or he will resign from the government and take two parties with him; Yisrael B'aliyah and the National Party. Sharon was given a choice between Peres and suicidal withdrawal, or his coalition. Sharon went with Peres and withdrawal.
On Oct. 17, 2001, four hours before Zeevi was to give his resignation speech to the Knesset, explaining who Peres was and why he couldn't sit in the same government as him, he was shot dead outside his hotel room in Jerusalem. Arabs may have been the triggermen, but the order came from within the Israeli government.

     Hamas was letting the murderers threaten Peres and that is never smart. The British and American guards paid to guard the Arabs pulled out early and Olmert took away the troublemakers. And so far, it's only cost Israel and the PA 4 dead and 34 wounded. But more are on the way. That's what happens when Sharon murderers Olmert and Peres are number one and two in Kadima.
     This election has been a gruesome fraud. I had candidate Yaacov Schlosser over on Friday. He was being primed to get into the Knesset by demanding that the police investigate the way Sharon went down. But he had a nasty call on his cell phone and is now way to frightened to carry on. So, out he goes.
     The election had one issue only, the removal of Judea and Samaria from Israel. But no one was going to debate that. Of course, the debater should have been Moshe Feiglin, except Netanyahu had a 12 second morning meeting with Feiglin and he was banned seeking a Likud seat to the Knesset.
      How long have I argued that the "Right Wing Activists" like Itamar Ben Gvir and Avigdor Eskin committed some dreadful crime and were forced to become provocateurs. That's how it's done and now the legal system is letting them collect some compensation from the courts. For years I was told Feiglin was ordered to break up Zo Artzeinu and take all his protesters to nowhere in the Likud. There, they would be given a bit of laxity, but that would go when the time was right.
      That time came and now there is no one to vote for and no Yesha withdrawal to debate.
      Too bad Feiglin followers! Anyone plan to keep in his fold?
      For that matter, anyone planning to vote in the Israeli election?
      I guess I should state that Israel is being brought down by the Vatican and their American buddies in the Council On Foreign Relations (CFR). The country's leaders are the most deranged crooks the CFR can cook up. This time the mafia is led by an Olmert/Peres, with a Bibi ready to make it a third. Other years there's been a Sharon, or Barak, or what was Shai's name, placed to get Sharon in, or Rabin. And all have been created and financed by the CFR. The exception is Peres who is the Vatican's toy-boy, but who cares by now? It's the same team anyway.
      The plot has a few more subtleties, like bringing in second stage leadership by showing them how the world's media is going to destroy Zionism by leaking some utterly dreadful secrets from the 1930s. But these "leaders" don't realize that the Jews of Israel will have to stand up to the truth sooner or later and there are proper ways to win. They are too terrified to tell their truth.
      Incredibly, some from the Right are encouraging people to vote.
      Shame on them.
      If you vote, you support the scam. You have one choice only. You do not vote and prepare to fight later.
      That is the only option that exists today in Israel. Face it.

www.barrychamish.com.



Britain's Duplicity and the Siege of Jericho Jail
Jonathan Cook, The Electronic Intifada, 15 March 2006

Israeli military vehicles take position near Jericho prison during an incursion to arrest PFLP leader Ahmed Saadat who was accused of masterminding the murder of an Israeli minister in 2001 and has been held in jail under British and American supervision ever since March 14, 2006. (MaanImages/Omar Abu Awad)


In the looking-glass world of Middle East politics, it is easy to forget that Ahmad Saadat, the imprisoned Palestinian leader Israel summarily arrested in Jericho late on Tuesday, is wanted for masterminding the killing of the Jewish state's most notorious racist politician-general.

Rehavam Zeevi, head of the Central Command in the late 1960s and early 1970s, personally developed and managed Israel's brutal regime in the newly occupied West Bank. After retiring from the battlefield, he waged a relentless war against "the Arabs" on the political front. His Moledet party, founded in the 1980s, advocated the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Greater Israel - in other words, from Israel and the occupied territories.

His thinking became so acceptable after the outbreak of the intifada that he was appointed tourism minister in Ariel Sharon's first cabinet. Maybe Sharon thought that, with Zeevi for company, he really might start to look like a man of peace.

Zeevi's killing by gunmen in a Jerusalem hotel in 2001 was about as close as the Palestinians have managed to get to emulating an Israeli-style targeted assassination - with the difference that, in the Palestinian operation, no bystanders were killed.

Israelis were, and still are, horrified by the killing of Zeevi, with most taking the view that the Palestinians broke all the rules of engagement in targeting an elected politician. That neatly ignores the point that Zeevi's death was retribution for Israel's earlier assassination of a widely respected Palestinian politician, Abu Ali Mustafa, the leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine.

But what is sauce for the goose was never going to be sauce for the gander.

PFLP Secretary General Ahmad Sa'adat speaks during a press conference with Nasser Al-Laham Chief Editor of Ma’an News Agency in his prison at the West Bank city of Jericho January 13, 2006. (MaanImages/Iyad Atayat)

Ahmad Saadat, Mustafa's successor and the man blamed by Israel for Zeevi's killing, raced to the top of the army's wanted list. Under international pressure, the Palestinian Authority, in the days before it was entirely dismembered by the Israeli army, arrested him.

To prevent his targeting for assassination by Israel, and in the vain hope of winning a reprieve for Yasser Arafat from his effective house arrest in Ramallah, the Palestinian leadership brokered a deal with Britain and the United States in 2002. The two countries agreed to provide monitors to guarantee Saadat's confinement in the tiny West Bank town of Jericho, in the sun-baked lowlands of the Jordan Valley.

Four years later, on Tuesday morning, Britain reneged on its understandings with the Palestinians and quit Jericho, but not before telling Israel it was going. As if waiting for its cue, Israeli armour rolled into Jericho at once to capture Saadat and a handful of other wanted men.

To Palestinians, the British broken promise, as well as the hasty exit from Jericho and apparent collusion with Israel, all smacked a little too painfully of other episodes of British foreign policy in the Middle East. There were echoes of 1956 and London's pact during the Suez Crisis with Israel on the invasion of Egypt. And there were echoes too of 1948, when Britain hurriedly abandoned Palestine, though not before it had effectively fulfilled the Balfour Declaration's promise of creating a Jewish homeland by allowing hundreds of thousands of Jews to immigrate.

That in large part explains the outpouring of rage from Gaza to Ramallah on Tuesday, as well as the kidnapping of foreigners. Britain's duplicity was a reminder - if it was needed - that nothing has changed in a century of Western "diplomacy".

So what was Britain's defence of its inflammatory action? According to foreign minister Jack Straw, Britain had no choice but to pull the monitors out of Jericho because of growing concerns for their safety.

That will have sounded more than hollow to Palestinians. The intifada has all but passed Jericho by. With a population of about 15,000, it is the quietest place in the West Bank and Gaza. During the decades of Israeli occupation it earnt an unflattering reputation as the dumping ground for small-time collaborators, the ones Israel did not reward with safe haven in its own territory.

Jericho is a small Palestinian island in a sea of Israeli occupation. Most of the Jordan Valley has been entirely controlled by Israel for decades. According to reports in the Hebrew media, Israel is poised to announce the Valley's annexation sometime after its elections later this month.

Around Jericho itself the Israeli army has dug a deep ditch to prevent all unauthorised movement in and out of the city. And beyond that is the busy "settlers' highway" through the occupied Jordan Valley, linking Jerusalem with the north of Israel, officially known as Gandhi's Road - after Rehavam Zeevi. He earned the nickname "Gandhi" as a skinny youth in the army.

In fact Jericho has been so peaceful during the intifada that six months ago, Israel reopened it to tourism, allowing package tours to pass through the Israeli-manned checkpoint on the only route into the city. I myself have visited the city on several recent occasions, staying in its hotels and enjoying their open-all-year swimming pools. What is apparently safe for tourists and journalists is not safe enough for British officials.

The problem now is that Straw's "concerns" about safety may become self-fulfilling. A backlash against foreigners is as certain as the attack on Tuesday against the British Council offices in Gaza. There are few tourists in the West Bank any longer, particularly since Israel made entering so difficult with the construction of its wall. But there are still a significant number of foreigners working for humanitarian organisations.

Their presence is important. Many of the organisations themselves have become little more than sticking plasters, unable to cope with the festering sores of Palestinian life under an ever-more restrictive occupation. But having foreigners living in Ramallah, Nablus and Hebron offers an insurance policy - even if a small and inadequate one - against more reckless Israeli army incursions. At the very least, foreigners can bear witness.

There would be nothing worse than the West Bank - after Israel's limited withdrawals and the completion of its wall - becoming a tiny Palestinian ghetto-state, one where neither the international media nor aid workers dare venture. There is also nothing that would satisfy Israel more.

Jonathan Cook, a British journalist living in Nazareth, is the author of "Blood and Religion: The Unmasking of the Jewish and Democratic State", published by Pluto Press next month. His website is www.jkcook.net.